Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online
0 registered (), 109 Guests and 11 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
65 Plus 4 Four Seater back seat Lift-a-dot studs
Fuel cap seal
Touring Scotland with Anglemog.
Not out the woods yet...
"Slammed Lada"
Newest Topics
Seeking a half tonneau for a 65 +4 four seater
by Edwin
Today at 02:12 AM
Goodwood Festival of Speed and Factory 'tickets'
by pete757
Yesterday at 06:08 PM
Use Gunk/degreaser to clean rear compartment?
by Joejoe
Yesterday at 05:16 PM
A rose between two thorns
by M3W55
Yesterday at 04:16 PM
Fossilmog Annual Hive Beach Picnic Sunday 30 June
by rid967
Yesterday at 12:47 PM
Exhaust Bobbins
by Craig Jezz
14/06/19 11:08 PM
Back on TM with a M3W on order
by lord-richfield
14/06/19 08:51 PM
Newest Members
arnieb, BradB, PANTHRO, MarsdenRobinson, M500
6524 Registered Users
Shout Box

Forum Stats
6,524 Registered Members
33 Forums
35,367 Topics
570,709 Posts

Most users ever online: 341 @ 11/02/18 10:30 PM
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Page 4 of 4 < 1 2 3 4
Topic Options
#551979 - 05/01/19 08:31 PM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: series1]
OZ 4/4 Offline

Talk Morgan Expert

Registered: 25/11/11
Posts: 2663
Loc: Australia - NSW Mid North Coas...
Originally Posted By series1
Hi not long purchased a 2014 plus 4 with 2500 on the clock after a run to Yorkshire decided to renew all the suspension after looking around and trying a plus 4 with just the front fitted I decided on SSL front and rear, boy what a difference,the car is now very usable,fitted rear myself easier than i thought ,leaf springs came out easy,on front fitted chrome kingpins,steering now lighter, so very pleased with set up.If any body wants to try mine they are welcome,duncan


Sounds like a very worthwhile exercise series1, Enjoy
ps, nice offer of a drive...
_________________________
A Morgan Identified Fastidious Owner...
2011 4/4 Bespoke, 1981 Delorean DMC 12

Top
#552329 - 07/01/19 10:48 AM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: Redfate]
CBY Offline
Learner Plates Off!

Registered: 20/12/11
Posts: 287
Loc: South West France
Fully agree with Ivormog who well summurizes the SSL advantages.

The best improvement made on my 2005 PLUS 4. A suspension which works on the right way.

On mechanical aspect, less stress on the chassis and the radiator. Installed by myself without difficulties, but if you have to change the kingpins and the bushes you must have some mechanical know-how and a reamer.
_________________________
Regards
2005 PLUS 4

Top
#552385 - 07/01/19 03:58 PM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: Redfate]
Button Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast

Registered: 19/12/11
Posts: 1704
Loc: Seattle, USA
The "Coil Over" shock rear suspension I have driven are trailing arm designed units. The rods go from the rear perch forward to the axle. Seems to Me this is much simpler than the SSL unit and I wonder why SSL did not use it.
_________________________
Button

Top
#552401 - 07/01/19 04:59 PM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: Button]
Peter J Offline
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle

Registered: 13/08/13
Posts: 11364
Loc: Salisbury, UK
Originally Posted By Button
The "Coil Over" shock rear suspension I have driven are trailing arm designed units. The rods go from the rear perch forward to the axle. Seems to Me this is much simpler than the SSL unit and I wonder why SSL did not use it.


Talking to Peter Ballard it seems that the SSL design was arranged as it is to give a useful amount of anti roll and anti squat, hence the angled upper links mounted forward of the axle line...
_________________________
Peter,
Tarka the 'Otter Mog
2014 Plus 8



Top
#552420 - 07/01/19 06:20 PM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: Redfate]
Redfate Offline
Just Getting Started

Registered: 30/01/18
Posts: 97
Loc: London England
Hi all,
I had my car MOT'd on Saturday by a Morgan dealer, he advised that there was some play in my front suspension but nothing much to worry about yet. It would probably be ok for another year or two yet!
So now I'm thinking of just changing to the basic SSL front kit of springs and shocks and leaving the king pins etc alone for a while longer.
It sounds as though The Rutherford set up would require new king pins and bushes at the same time which I think would be unecessary for now.
I don't push the car hard and the handling for my driving style is pretty good, I just need something that will handle todays poor roads better.
I think, listening to you guys, I'll go with a DIY fit of SSL fronts and maybe some new shocks for the rear while I'm at it :-)
_________________________
Paul

2009 4/4 Sport in Red
2016 Harley Davidson Road Glide Ultra

Top
#552468 - 07/01/19 10:30 PM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: Redfate]
Gambalunga Offline

Member of the Inner Circle

Registered: 03/09/11
Posts: 11316
Loc: Mandello del Lario, Lake Como,...
A set of hardchrome king pins will not cost much. I would do the job while you are at it as the suspension will work much better with new kingpins and bushes.

There might be someone around who has a reamer and can help you fit them.
_________________________
Peter


Top
#552471 - 07/01/19 10:42 PM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: Gambalunga]
Deejay Offline
L - Learner Plates On

Registered: 20/06/15
Posts: 249
Loc: North Somerset, UK
Originally Posted By Gambalunga
A set of hardchrome king pins will not cost much. I would do the job while you are at it as the suspension will work much better with new kingpins and bushes.

There might be someone around who has a reamer and can help you fit them.

Sage advice indeed. If a job is worth doing...
and of course, the fewer times things are taken apart the better!

Top
#552582 - 08/01/19 06:28 PM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: Peter J]
Button Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast

Registered: 19/12/11
Posts: 1704
Loc: Seattle, USA
Originally Posted By Peter J
Originally Posted By Button
The "Coil Over" shock rear suspension I have driven are trailing arm designed units. The rods go from the rear perch forward to the axle. Seems to Me this is much simpler than the SSL unit and I wonder why SSL did not use it.


Talking to Peter Ballard it seems that the SSL design was arranged as it is to give a useful amount of anti roll and anti squat, hence the angled upper links mounted forward of the axle line...


Don't understand how the angled upper links accomplish this. I would think the adjustments of the damper as well as the Spring Rate would control roll and either forward or rear mounted links squat. But remember I am a retired Accountant not Suspension Engineer.
_________________________
Button

Top
#552593 - 08/01/19 07:06 PM Re: SSL verses Rutherford? [Re: Deejay]
Hamwich Offline

Talk Morgan Guru

Registered: 28/04/08
Posts: 7544
Loc: Gloucestershire, UK
Originally Posted By Deejay
Originally Posted By Gambalunga
A set of hardchrome king pins will not cost much. I would do the job while you are at it as the suspension will work much better with new kingpins and bushes.

There might be someone around who has a reamer and can help you fit them.

Sage advice indeed. If a job is worth doing...
and of course, the fewer times things are taken apart the better!


Absolutely. Once the hardchrome kingpins are in it should be good for well over 50,000 miles. Do the job once and you won't have to touch it again.
_________________________
Tim H.
1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 1957 R4 CV, 2005 Ferrari Vipar

Top
Page 4 of 4 < 1 2 3 4

Moderator:  Aeroman, Boshly, Simon