Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online
2 registered (Joejoe, Dave Collis), 111 Guests and 18 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
65 Plus 4 Four Seater back seat Lift-a-dot studs
Fuel cap seal
Touring Scotland with Anglemog.
Not out the woods yet...
"Slammed Lada"
Newest Topics
Seeking a half tonneau for a 65 +4 four seater
by Edwin
Today at 02:12 AM
Goodwood Festival of Speed and Factory 'tickets'
by pete757
Yesterday at 06:08 PM
Use Gunk/degreaser to clean rear compartment?
by Joejoe
Yesterday at 05:16 PM
A rose between two thorns
by M3W55
Yesterday at 04:16 PM
Fossilmog Annual Hive Beach Picnic Sunday 30 June
by rid967
Yesterday at 12:47 PM
Exhaust Bobbins
by Craig Jezz
14/06/19 11:08 PM
Back on TM with a M3W on order
by lord-richfield
14/06/19 08:51 PM
Newest Members
arnieb, BradB, PANTHRO, MarsdenRobinson, M500
6524 Registered Users
Shout Box

Forum Stats
6,524 Registered Members
33 Forums
35,367 Topics
570,709 Posts

Most users ever online: 341 @ 11/02/18 10:30 PM
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#551132 - 01/01/19 07:07 AM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: DaveW]
Mogdriver Offline
Just Getting Started

Registered: 19/11/13
Posts: 35
Loc: Tauranga. New Zealand
Hi Dave
With your fitting of the attachment point of the panhard rod to the spring base, will that bolt that attaches the rod not hammer out on the chassis cross brace on rebound. Just looking at your first picture of the rod laid out is it not designed for the cross brace to be mounted approximately 25mm further back so that the bolt head will clear the cross brace. It means that the panhard rod will then be at a slight angle to the Chassis brace.
I admit I am not privy to the installation instructions so I may be totally out of order. Hopefully this makes sense. Comments from PGB.
Doug
From deep deep downunder.

Top
#551147 - 01/01/19 09:29 AM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: DaveW]
DaveW Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle

Registered: 11/12/08
Posts: 17424
Loc: South Yorkshire
Hi Doug.

The crossmember is meant to fit hard up against the rear floor timber. It could be mounted further forward on cars with this fuel tank but not on later cars with much less space.

The six leaf springs make the bottom plate much lower than the four leaf springs. Static test shows minimal clearance so I think it will be fine.

If it knocks, I'll insert some spacers between the chassis and crossmember and file a bit away from the crossmember at the point of contact. thumbs
_________________________
DaveW
2005 Corsa Red Roadster S1
2016 Saffron Yellow (Narrow) Plus 4

Top
#551148 - 01/01/19 10:22 AM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: madmax]
Hamwich Offline

Talk Morgan Guru

Registered: 28/04/08
Posts: 7544
Loc: Gloucestershire, UK
Originally Posted By madmax
Panhard rod is a must on a trad


I would agree. After the SSL front conversion, this is the best mod one can make to improve handling.
_________________________
Tim H.
1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 1957 R4 CV, 2005 Ferrari Vipar

Top
#551152 - 01/01/19 10:56 AM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: DaveW]
John V6 Offline

Member of the Inner Circle

Registered: 21/07/07
Posts: 13286
Loc: Suffolk
It made a huge difference to my +4. Can't say on the Roadster as it had one fitted & I then added anti tramp bars to keep it all in line.
_________________________
JohnV6
2006 Indigo Blue Roadster S1

Top
#551156 - 01/01/19 12:18 PM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: KEVFITZ]
Burgundymog Offline

Talk Morgan Addict

Registered: 11/05/14
Posts: 3527
Loc: Essex
Originally Posted By KEVFITZ
You do know that if you bought a +4 Supersports all your wished for modifications and performance updates would have been fitted at the factory !!!


Says the man who hasn't stopped modifying since he bought it ! laugh2
_________________________
Keith
2013 narrow bodied + 4 Ruby. Wolf performance Re-map suspension mods and K&N cone filter.

Top
#551203 - 01/01/19 02:46 PM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: Burgundymog]
BobtheTrain Offline

Charter Member

Registered: 15/04/14
Posts: 5223
Loc: Renfrewshire
Originally Posted By Burgundymog
Says the man who hasn't stopped modifying since he bought it ! laugh2

Does he mod the rocker?
_________________________
Best Regards
Lang may yer lum reek

Top
#551206 - 01/01/19 02:59 PM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: DaveW]
Craig Jezz Offline

Talk Morgan Regular

Registered: 27/03/17
Posts: 944
Loc: Oxon

I’ve noticed SIFAB are now manufacturing Panhard Rod kits (in Miscellany)

It’s on my wish list to have one installed this year.



_________________________
Craig Jezz

Morgan 4/4 Sports Sand (Williams & Wolf Tuned)

Top
#551209 - 01/01/19 03:14 PM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: DaveW]
Redfate Offline
Just Getting Started

Registered: 30/01/18
Posts: 97
Loc: London England
Personally I'm not keen on the idea of clamping the leaf springs with the bracket arrangement that the SIFAB uses, I do like the SSL method with the plate under the mounting though.
_________________________
Paul

2009 4/4 Sport in Red
2016 Harley Davidson Road Glide Ultra

Top
#551366 - 02/01/19 01:49 PM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: DaveW]
CooperMan Offline

Talk Morgan Regular

Registered: 19/11/15
Posts: 912
Loc: Yorkshire
Dave, top job as ever !

I had a Mulfab one on the S1 and it definitely made a difference
_________________________
Jon M

Top
#551410 - 02/01/19 05:02 PM Re: Workshop Note - Fitting a Panhard Rod [Re: Redfate]
IvorMog Offline

Talk Morgan Regular

Registered: 17/04/17
Posts: 792
Loc: Staffordshire
Originally Posted By Redfate
Personally I'm not keen on the idea of clamping the leaf springs with the bracket arrangement that the SIFAB uses, I do like the SSL method with the plate under the mounting though.


I've been thinking about which is the better clamping method as I'm going to be fitting one soon.

The Sifab (and Mulfab) method of clamping directly onto the spring will in theory alter the movement of the spring but as it's right against the axle mounting I doubt it will have any noticeable effect. It's also well tried and tested over many years and fitments.

My slight worry with the SSL method (and remember I'm a great fan of the SSL front suspension system) is that it might induce some twisting moment into the axle clamping U bolts and I don't know what long term effect that will have on the U bolt tightness.

I think I'll go with the Sifab spring clamping system and see how the SSL method develops.


Edited by IvorMog (02/01/19 06:19 PM)
_________________________
Bob

1999 4/4 1.8 Zetec

Top
Page 3 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Moderator:  Aeroman, Boshly, Simon