Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online
19 registered (Stewart S, brian battersby, PeterG, Ricardo, N22MOG, deano, CooperMan, jimmyw, rcmatt, M3W55, Shooter, NickCW, DonM, jong, SER, dodgyken, rainbowj, Guten, yobtaf), 63 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest Photos
Rodger's M3W oil cooler
Bonesies new car :
4/4 80th Anniversary
Dunnottar Moonrise
Rodger's M3W
Newest Topics
oil cooler installation
by rcmatt
20/02/19 01:40 PM
Fitting a valance to my +4
by tommog
20/02/19 11:08 AM
A big welcome from the Inner Circle
by DaveW
20/02/19 10:01 AM
Spark Plugs
by James B W
20/02/19 09:30 AM
Golf Clubs
by SFG
20/02/19 08:29 AM
Im in the club !! new (to me ) +4
by Bonesie
19/02/19 11:05 PM
How do you say "Worcestershire sauce"?
by Gambalunga
19/02/19 08:44 PM
Newest Members
lysholmn1, LightSpeed, David Gibson, thelastgizmo, Shadmog
6386 Registered Users
Shout Box

Forum Stats
6,386 Registered Members
33 Forums
34,273 Topics
550,309 Posts

Most users ever online: 341 @ 11/02/18 10:30 PM
Today's Birthdays
Boshly
Topic Options
#558428 - 07/02/19 01:28 PM Anti-tramp bars - technical question
griffo Offline
Learner Plates Off!

Registered: 31/07/14
Posts: 410
Loc: Cornwall
We plan to fit anti-tramps bars to Possum to complement the panhard rod and LSD and limit spring windup in the light of the extra power and torque of the Ecoboost engine. The questions is: is there any reason the bars cannot be reversed and connected to the rear spring hangers rather than the front ones? Superficial examination would suggest this would be easier and avoid having to cut the floor away to achieve clearance. Is there any technical reason why the bars would not operate properly this way round? Grateful your views.


Edited by griffo (07/02/19 01:29 PM)
_________________________
www.griffopix.com

Top
#558431 - 07/02/19 02:11 PM Re: Anti-tramp bars - technical question [Re: griffo]
DaveW Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle

Registered: 11/12/08
Posts: 16978
Loc: South Yorkshire
All I can say is that with the conventional mount, the bar will be compressed under load as the axle rotates backwards against the forward rotation of the wheels.

So with a rear mount the bar will be under tension. Not sure how easy it would be to mount to the rear hangers?
_________________________
DaveW
2005 Corsa Red Roadster S1
2016 Saffron Yellow (Narrow) Plus 4

Top
#558443 - 07/02/19 03:18 PM Re: Anti-tramp bars - technical question [Re: griffo]
Richard Wood Offline
Has a lot to Say!

Registered: 03/02/16
Posts: 1490
Loc: East Harling, Norfolk UK
Some useful stuff from Lorne here particularly the comments about further limiting suspension movement.

Although most reaction arms (brake or transmission) are designed to be under tension when needed (which seems instinctively right), the five link coil over system on latest Roadsters creates both.



Sorry this doesn't answer your query but given all the other work you have done on Posum, would it be reasonable to suggest going straight for the SSL 5 link system
_________________________
Richard

2018 Roadster - Red/Magnolia - "Morton"
1967 Land Rover series 2a SWB
1960 Velocette Venom

Top
#558450 - 07/02/19 03:58 PM Re: Anti-tramp bars - technical question [Re: griffo]
Rog Offline

Talk Morgan Regular

Registered: 31/05/12
Posts: 842
Loc: Sumerset
Originally Posted By griffo
Is there any technical reason why the bars would not operate properly this way round? Grateful your views.

Umm…. two scenarios depending on where it was fixed maybe thinking

If the tramp bar was fixed to the rear spring eye then might the shackle bracket rotation still allow the axle to tramp or twist should the front portion of the leaf spring “winds up” under acceleration or braking?

Or

If the tramp bar was fixed to the rear chassis eye then the leaf spring might become much stiffer as the tramp bar would prevent the shackle bracket rotating and preventing the leaf spring from extending in length as the spring was loaded vertically?
_________________________
Roger
2006 4/4 Duratec

Top
#558458 - 07/02/19 04:30 PM Re: Anti-tramp bars - technical question [Re: griffo]
griffo Offline
Learner Plates Off!

Registered: 31/07/14
Posts: 410
Loc: Cornwall
Ah Roger,
I think you may be right. Thanks for those thoughts. The SSL system would actually be the answer - it's just a question of money.
P
_________________________
www.griffopix.com

Top
#558506 - 07/02/19 08:02 PM Re: Anti-tramp bars - technical question [Re: griffo]
Gambalunga Offline

Member of the Inner Circle

Registered: 03/09/11
Posts: 10741
Loc: Mandello del Lario, Lake Como,...
What the heck! It's only money. spend drive
_________________________
Peter


Top
#558526 - 07/02/19 10:08 PM Re: Anti-tramp bars - technical question [Re: griffo]
Heinz Offline

Talk Morgan Addict

Registered: 07/09/09
Posts: 3520
Loc: Cologne, Germany
I think the front parts of the leaf spring should be calmed down because there the force of the cardan shaft there twists the spring to an S.

Have a look at this two videos, without and with anti tramp bars. Filmed from underneath at the leaf spring.

https://youtu.be/otP5xU8qvYY

https://youtu.be/yaVDqJEEKR8

Top
#558571 - 08/02/19 07:56 AM Re: Anti-tramp bars - technical question [Re: griffo]
Soleng Offline
Talk Morgan Regular

Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 528
Loc: Norway
Look at the Mogvette rear suspension.

Harald
_________________________
+4 4-seater 2008 Squadron Blue


Top

Moderator:  Aeroman, Boshly, Simon