Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online Now
2 members (DaveW, flyfisher), 109 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 103
John V6 66
Newest Members
BenRoadster, Max5787, Jack Noir, phenompilot52, Orjan
9,638 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Old Book
by Morganmike - 21/09/26 07:54 PM
ABS Unit problems on 2013 Aero Plus 8
by Ambrose2 - 21/09/26 11:23 AM
Factory meet
by Julian BB - 21/09/26 09:25 AM
Diss Festival of Transport
by RichardV6 - 20/09/26 01:35 PM
Goodwood
by waikiore - 19/09/26 02:50 PM
My 4/4 as it was in 1975
by Strathaven - 18/09/26 09:09 AM
US Cars - Metric Threads?
by Paul F - 17/09/26 08:29 PM
Latest Photos
First Morgan as it is now
First Morgan as it is now
by Strathaven, September 15
New to me 95 plus 4 daily driver
New to me 95 plus 4 daily driver
by SailingTom2, September 12
Bits to give away
Bits to give away
by TigerTim, September 11
1989 Morgan Plus 4 in Ontario, Canada
1989 Morgan Plus 4 in Ontario, Canada
by Carbuilder, September 5
First anniversary of Plus 4
First anniversary of Plus 4
by Strathaven, September 5
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,932
Posts838,511
Members9,638
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
AlexCreasey
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,385
Likes: 358
DaveW Online Content OP
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
OP Online Content
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,385
Likes: 358
For those TMers who have not been around forever, the front suspension on the trad was upgraded in 06/07, to level the track rods, and I believe part of the change may have been to place the track rods under the steering arms, unless the arms themselves were lowered on the stubs.
I know this because my Roadster had the earlier spec stubs with plastic bushes when new. The first owner (after being the dealer demo) felt that the handling was unsafe and had exchanges with the factory, and did not give up. The outcome was that he insisted on the later spec set up, and was provided with this 'at cost'. I have the documentation and it wasn't cheap even at cost, but presumably made him happy. So my Roadster had revised stub axles with bronze bushing, and the dealer had to modify the over rider brackets to avoid contact with the lower positioned track rods. This is evident as quite a rough fix - still visible now.
I'm relating this story for two reasons. One owner felt the design was unsafe but a large number accepted it and continue to accept it as it is, and had been so for several years. And yet the factory changed it for the better, so you might surmise that feedback over time led them to do that, and the design has continued to evolve slowly. Steering bearings were the next upgrade.........
The second reason for mentioning this again is to illustrate the point that nothing is new in the world of Morgan, but changes are rarely documented or announced publicly.


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,502
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,502

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,916
Likes: 354
Salty Sea Dog
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Salty Sea Dog
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,916
Likes: 354
Interesting.
One might think they would remember such problems when it came to the 3W??
I'm happy with the old steering box... smile


Graham (G4FUJ)

Sold L44FOR 4/4 Giallo Fly
'11 MINI Countryman Cooper D All4
'90 LR 90 SW
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,751
Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,751
Likes: 158
That is strange. According to Mulfab the change in the early 2000s introduced the problem. I can only think that later modifications made by Morgan in 2006/7 resolved the issue. I certainly haven't noticed anything I would call bump steer. Before I fitted the Suplex kit I did occasionally get the front end skipping sideways in hard cornering but now it sticks like glue to the road.


Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,751
Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,751
Likes: 158
Originally Posted By Graham, G4FUJ
Interesting.
One might think they would remember such problems when it came to the 3W??
I'm happy with the old steering box... smile

Problem with the M3W is simple. They have allowed design esthetiques to rule over good engineering practice (well covered in another thread). Now they are constricted to make "adjustments" to achieve the best possible results. Without a complete redesign and the acceptance of a different "look" to the front end there will always remain a certain compromise.

It is a matter of style over function. A bit like a woman in stiletto heels trying to walk on a cobbled street hide


Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,947
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,947
Originally Posted By Graham, G4FUJ
Interesting.
I'm happy with the old steering box... smile

There must be a bit of bump steer with steering box cars as when one wheel deflects the drag link will be the wrong length (too short). But the total suspension movement is small and I suspect other things hide the effect. Would not surprise me if folk who have fitted the Suplex kit notice it a bit more, but as overall the suspension will be better, I suspect not really an issue.


1930 Super Sports Aero 'The Elk'
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,916
Likes: 354
Salty Sea Dog
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Salty Sea Dog
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,916
Likes: 354
More with my '76 car Martyn, but I put that down to more play in the earlier box. As I've only done 153 miles in the 'new' one so far, and the first 100+ were breaking in a set of new tyres, I haven't noticed any so far. Plenty of time for that. Planning on visiting the DonMog CT tomorrow, so by the time I've visited friends in Wirksworth (if they are in) that should easily add another 200 Miles, because they'll both want to be taken out for a spin! smile

Originally Posted By Gambalunga
It is a matter of style over function. A bit like a woman in stiletto heels trying to walk on a cobbled street

That's good, I like that analogy Peter! thumbs grin2


Graham (G4FUJ)

Sold L44FOR 4/4 Giallo Fly
'11 MINI Countryman Cooper D All4
'90 LR 90 SW
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 69
N
Talk Morgan Addict
Offline
Talk Morgan Addict
N
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 69
Just wondering why mmc didn't go for sliding pillar on the 3 w?
Nick

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,502
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,502
MMC didn't really design the M3W, did they? I understood it's an imported design from an American builder, made under license. Very little Morgan DNA in it.

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 870
A
AQM Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
A
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 870
Originally Posted By nputtick
MMC didn't really design the M3W, did they? I understood it's an imported design from an American builder, made under license. Very little Morgan DNA in it.


It's the Ace Cycle Car. But the front suspension is not like the Ace - it's an all Morgan design.

(totally unrelated, but I'm surprised to see a "poll manager" below the text box I'm writing this in. Is this new?)

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5