|
10 members (Sir Percival, B3MOG, DalesPlusFour, Rog G, RobC, Barkbark, Julian BB, High Hamster, Lance, Ritchie B),
354
guests, and
31
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums39
Topics49,918
Posts838,236
Members9,638
| |
Most Online1,063 Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,290 Likes: 9
Talk Morgan Expert
|
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,290 Likes: 9 |
I decided recently to read around. I started with Bob Woodwards four books on Bush. Plan of Attack is worth reading. I read Tony Blairs Journey, Some of the Hutton report, Alastair Campbells Diaries, George Bush's memoir and a very interesting book by Douglas Feith who was the under secretary of Defence for Policy from 2001.which I think might be a model memoir. Well worth reading if you have the time.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,842 Likes: 11
le Asbo du Bling Talk Morgan Addict
|
le Asbo du Bling Talk Morgan Addict
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,842 Likes: 11 |
Absolutely, they didn't read or understand the information provided and were in awe of "Mr Bush"...the lot of them deserve to be censured: they showed they were not up to the job.
I'd like to see all the MPs and Government Officers involved with the decision removed from office, banned from holding any public office and fined. We need to remember that a number of his cabinet were opposed to his actions. My gripe is that TB has benefited by the status his action have provided him with in the USA more than it would appear any other PM has benefited and certainly more than you would expect of any good socialist. We deserve to know if he put his own gain above that of the nation.
Slowly going green
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,290 Likes: 9
Talk Morgan Expert
|
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,290 Likes: 9 |
In any event, the terms of Resolution 1441, paragraph 4 (above), make it clear that a failure of Iraq to cooperate, if reported to the Security Council, would not justify either the United States' or any other state's unilateral suspension of the cease-fire provision without giving the Security Council an opportunity to consider the situation and to act under paragraph 12. Resolution 1441, however, does not specify what is to happen if the Security Council convenes under paragraph 12, but does not take action or only takes action that some states, in particular a specially affected state, do not consider adequate under the circumstances. Nor does Resolution 1441 specify what is to happen if a specially affected state at some point concludes that Iraq is not cooperating fully, but the inspectors disagree and thus do not at that point contemplate making a report to the Council under paragraph 4. In such circumstances, the United States and its allies could argue that a material breach has occurred and nothing stands in the way of their suspension of the cease-fire that was based on Resolution 687. They would further argue that, since Resolution 678 (the resolution that authorized member states to take action against Iraq in the first place) has never been rescinded, it provides continuing authority to use "all necessary means to restore international peace and security in the area." And all the related stuff is interesting too. I didn't realise that there was officially a cease fire. i.e Resolution 687. post Kuwait.
Last edited by meabh; 24/07/16 08:49 PM.
|
|
|
|
|