Click here to return to the home page.
Classic Morgans
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 306 guests, and 37 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 104
John V6 65
Newest Members
BenRoadster, Max5787, Jack Noir, phenompilot52, Orjan
9,638 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Suspension upgrades
by Ricosan - 15/09/26 04:06 PM
M16 engine oil pan gasket
by Carbuilder - 14/09/26 05:40 PM
Aero 8 S5 Sound System
by Pittsartist - 14/09/26 10:21 AM
EV beckons....
by TBM - 14/09/26 09:45 AM
Eurotunnel – is it a Car or Motorcycle?
by Chris99 - 13/09/26 05:44 PM
Body Mounting Bolts
by M3WMW - 13/09/26 02:02 PM
What Matt Humphries has been up to
by Bunny - 13/09/26 10:01 AM
Latest Photos
First Morgan as it is now
First Morgan as it is now
by Strathaven, September 15
New to me 95 plus 4 daily driver
New to me 95 plus 4 daily driver
by SailingTom2, September 12
Bits to give away
Bits to give away
by TigerTim, September 11
1989 Morgan Plus 4 in Ontario, Canada
1989 Morgan Plus 4 in Ontario, Canada
by Carbuilder, September 5
First anniversary of Plus 4
First anniversary of Plus 4
by Strathaven, September 5
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,918
Posts838,254
Members9,638
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
Smed., Spanner Juggler
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,375
Likes: 354
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,375
Likes: 354
Thats certainly how it reads in the dealer notice and the 1998 sales brochure. The dealer notice which came from Richard (Aus) is reproduced in the appendix. It's a very interesting document which draws a clear line in the sand. Initially I assumed that the superform wings and stainless bulkhead came at the same time, but after discussing the changes at the factory with those who were there, it was possible to confirm a two stage evolution.
The aluminium wings up to late 1997 were not superform.


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,723
Likes: 2
S
SBM Offline
Talk Morgan Sage
Offline
Talk Morgan Sage
S
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,723
Likes: 2
It's a shame there isn't a book on the subject currently for sale..


Steve
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 5
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 5
Don't think it would sell Steve !!!


" I LOVE THE SOUND OF THROTTLE BODIES IN THE MORNING " (ROBERT DUVAL IN "APOCOLYPSE NOW " )
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,415
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,415
4/4's were still narrow bodied and chassis'd for a while after the long door changes

Simon @ SiFab.co.uk


Simon @ Sifab.co.uk

Sifabtemporary@gmail.com
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
IvorMog Offline OP
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Originally Posted By SimonH
4/4's were still narrow bodied and chassis'd for a while after the long door changes

Simon @ SiFab.co.uk


My car is Long Door, Narrow Body, Steering Rack and Stainless Steel Bulkhead.

From what I'm reading then all 4/4's went to wide bodies and from some date have stayed as wide body. So current 4/4's are wide body???

What is (are) the salient dimension (s) that indicates the Body / Chassis width?

When was that changeover date (year)?

Last edited by IvorMog; 18/01/18 05:54 PM.

Bob

2009 Black Roadster
1999 4/4 2 litre Zetec
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,269
Likes: 324
Scruffy Oik
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Scruffy Oik
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,269
Likes: 324
Originally Posted By IvorMog

What is (are) the salient dimension (s) that indicates the Body / Chassis width?


Given that the frame of the body tub sits on the upper flanges of the Z section chassis. I would think it follows that the critical dimension is the distance between the inner vertical faces of the chassis rails. A wider body tub would also require the chassis rails to be more widely spaced to suit.

I don't know what this is on the later/wider cars, but I do know that this dimension on a 1980's era 4/4 is 36".


Tim H.
1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,375
Likes: 354
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,375
Likes: 354
Originally Posted By IvorMog
Originally Posted By SimonH
4/4's were still narrow bodied and chassis'd for a while after the long door changes

Simon @ SiFab.co.uk


My car is Long Door, Narrow Body, Steering Rack and Stainless Steel Bulkhead.

From what I'm reading then all 4/4's went to wide bodies and from some date have stayed as wide body. So current 4/4's are wide body???

What is (are) the salient dimension (s) that indicates the Body / Chassis width?

When was that changeover date (year)?


Bob - you won't find that level of detail. Morgans are not like that!!!!

If the 4/4 started narrower in '97 its very likely that they built narrow 4/4's and wider 4/4's at the same time for a short period. Certainly the 70th Anniversary cars built in 2006 look to be the current style of body, as does the Runabout from 2003.


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,210
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 5,210
Originally Posted By IvorMog
Originally Posted By SimonH
4/4's were still narrow bodied and chassis'd for a while after the long door changes

Simon @ SiFab.co.uk




From what I'm reading then all 4/4's went to wide bodies and from some date have stayed as wide body. So current 4/4's are wide body???



No, they’re narrow wide bodies. wink


Roger

Mogless in Cheshire. Ex -2011 4/4 Sport

https://thecourtyardcheshire.com/
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
IvorMog Offline OP
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Originally Posted By Hamwich
Originally Posted By IvorMog

What is (are) the salient dimension (s) that indicates the Body / Chassis width?


Given that the frame of the body tub sits on the upper flanges of the Z section chassis. I would think it follows that the critical dimension is the distance between the inner vertical faces of the chassis rails. A wider body tub would also require the chassis rails to be more widely spaced to suit.

I don't know what this is on the later/wider cars, but I do know that this dimension on a 1980's era 4/4 is 36".


Thanks Tim,

At last, a dimension I can relate to.

Just been in the garage and measured mine and it's 36"as well.

I think you're right, the body tub must relate to the chassis so now we know the narrow body dimension would someone nip into the garage please and measure a wide body car.

It's not that cold.

Last edited by IvorMog; 18/01/18 07:19 PM.

Bob

2009 Black Roadster
1999 4/4 2 litre Zetec
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,375
Likes: 354
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,375
Likes: 354
Just had a look at the specification tables I put together.

The 4/4 front and rear track increased in 2000.
So 1997 to 2000 was narrow track. From that point, the front track increased by 0.75" and the rear by 0.25".

Coincidentally the Plus 4 ceased production in 2000 for four years, and one might speculate that this also had an impact on 4/4 dimensions. There would likely have been some Plus 4 components left over at that point.


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5