Click here to return to the home page.
Morgan 3 Wheeler
Who's Online Now
7 members (Joe Speetjens, BLUE+4, Olle H, Jensen1960, nick w, Vansrv6, Alan Patterson), 254 guests, and 46 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
John V6 79
+8Rich 70
DaveW 67
Newest Members
Ulfulf, Wilfried, Classic-Line, BrunswickGreen44, Franco Morgan
9,203 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Supermax sprocket
by Laurens - 21/07/25 08:26 AM
Morgan 3 Wheeler song
by Dutch - 21/07/25 12:31 AM
Technical drawings, dimensions, 3D model M3W
by Oskar - 20/07/25 04:13 PM
Goggle eyed
by Roady - 19/07/25 06:16 PM
FOR SALE AERO8 series 1 WHEELS
by t50 - 19/07/25 12:07 PM
Lions Tour
by OZ 4/4 - 19/07/25 11:55 AM
Morgan rebuild on Facebook
by TBM - 19/07/25 10:50 AM
Latest Photos
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
by DaveK, July 19
Visit to the Factory- Historic Morgan Group
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,337
Posts812,917
Members9,203
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
toitoine
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 2
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 2
The best for engine is 98
If you cant put It use 95 with additif

Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 501
Likes: 2
R
Talk Morgan Regular
Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
R
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 501
Likes: 2
Excuse me for being a little blond, but isn't the needed octane number related to the compression rate? That is, if an engine has a very high compression rate, it might need 98 or even 100 octane, if not 95 is enough. No modern engine I know of in road going cars has anything that really needs 98. Of course you can put it in, but you will achieve no benefit. I had an old Sierra that was specified for 98, if you put anything lower in it you could risk premature firing just by the compression (like a diesel), not the spark from the spark plug. But not so with a modern car. I also had an Elise - tried with both 98 and 95, noticed absolutely no difference. I hardly think that the MW3 S&S engine is high compression and really needs 98. So, if the engine can tolerate 95 anything above is a waste money, if 98 really is needed anything below can/will cause problems. Or am I totally wrong?


Robbie the Norseman
2004 V6 Roadster
Sherwood green
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 26
R
Talk Morgan Addict
Offline
Talk Morgan Addict
R
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 26
Bear in mind that the numbers are quoted differently on the other side of the "Pond" so adjustment is required to be comparable


Robbie
2021 Plus Four -- Helga
211-WX-1433

"Fettlebodge"--A chief of the PaddyMogs
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22
New to Talk Morgan
Offline
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 22
I was advised to use 98 by Aero Racing and have done so out of habit. I also use Shell Optimax in my day car and have frequently recorded better mileage...


2017 MTW Graphite Blue
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 2
Ray Offline
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,181
Likes: 2
I think the best advice is use what the engine manufacturer says, most recommend 95 on modern cars.


.+8 Now gone for a 1800 4/4. Duratec in bright yellow.
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 945
Likes: 16
Marmota Offline OP
Talk Morgan Regular
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 945
Likes: 16
Originally Posted by Ray
I think the best advice is use what the engine manufacturer says, most recommend 95 on modern cars.


As you say, most recommend 95. But many still recommend 95 or 98 (both).

If I remember correctly (my classes of combustibles at the engineering school are so distant now...), the 98 fuel will "burn" smoother, and more complete, than the 95 fuel, as its hydrocarbons molecules are shorter and easier / faster to "burn". But being shorter, the molecules have less energy than the long ones in a 95 octane fuel. So benefits are diluted by the "lower energy" of its molecules in most of the engines.

But as our S&S V-Twin is American, and quite "peculiar" compared to a regular car engine... maybe we can feel a real difference between using both fuels… That’s why I asked.

For example, in our 1988 Range Rover, we Only use 98 fuel. If we use 95, the engine is noisier and the consumption a little higher...


Javier - Madrid, Spain - Commander of Speedy Marmots Bomb Squadron
www.speedymarmots.com
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 15
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 15
octane rating are a way of rating the speed in which a fuel will burn. It initially was based upon the amount of "octane" molecules in the fuel. There are a lot of variables in the octane rating for any engine. The S&S (and HD's) are high compression engines. Higher compression engines need higher octane (the higher the octane the slower the speed of the burn). This is because higher compression in and of it self makes fuel more likely to burn. Put too low of an octane in these engines risks pre-ignition. Recall that diesel engines only use a glow plug to start, but burn due to compression once the engine warmed up.

Often, higher compression engines are also higher performing engines. Therefore people think that using a higher octane fuel is what causes the higher performance However, taking a standard engine that needs a lower octane fuel, you will have no higher performance, instead, you may actually have poorer performance as the slower burning fuel will not have enough time in a cycle to do a complete burn. Or worse yet, you will have wasted money.


Rodger
2018 M3W "Dreamers on the Rise"
2004 Plus 8 (wife's)
old Goldwings and a couple of Harleys
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,948
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,948
Originally Posted by Robbie Mathisen
No modern engine I know of in road going cars has anything that really needs 98. Of course you can put it in, but you will achieve no benefit. I had an old Sierra that was specified for 98, if you put anything lower in it you could risk premature firing just by the compression (like a diesel), not the spark from the spark plug. But not so with a modern car. I also had an Elise - tried with both 98 and 95, noticed absolutely no difference. I hardly think that the MW3 S&S engine is high compression and really needs 98. So, if the engine can tolerate 95 anything above is a waste money, if 98 really is needed anything below can/will cause problems. Or am I totally wrong?


Not wrong Robbie, but maybe a little behind the times. Modern high output engines , particularly those using forced induction or leaner air/fuel ratios, have particular need to avoid pre-ignition or detonation and manufacturers will specify (Europe) 97/98 Ron fuel for certain models. My AMG has a little notice by the fuel filler cap as a reminder!

To protect these engines (for example where lower grade fuel is used, or conditions cause cylinder head or inlet charge temperatures to exceed the normal range) a piezo-electric sensor is built into each cylinder head to detect incipient pre-detonation and change the spark advance (via the ECU) to protect the engine. Sophisticated engines can do this individually by cylinder and highly-boosted engines will usually bleed a bit of inlet boost pressure at the same time.

Not relevant to three-wheelers I know! But there are very good reasons why some engines specify 98 Ron.

Last edited by twotribes; 15/01/20 06:52 PM.

Stuart
"There's no skill substitute like cubic inches."
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 43
N
Talk Morgan Addict
Online Content
Talk Morgan Addict
N
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,665
Likes: 43
Probably irrelevant but in my little Abarth I definitely get more mpg if I use 98. No idea why and I've always meant to do the maths and see if it's actually cheaper to buy the dearer petrol. Never got round to it though.
Nick

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 43
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 43
Originally Posted by twotribes

Not wrong Robbie, but maybe a little behind the times. Modern high output engines , particularly those using forced induction or leaner air/fuel ratios, have particular need to avoid pre-ignition or detonation and manufacturers will specify (Europe) 97/98 Ron fuel for certain models. My AMG has a little notice by the fuel filler cap as a reminder!

To protect these engines (for example where lower grade fuel is used, or conditions cause cylinder head or inlet charge temperatures to exceed the normal range) a piezo-electric sensor is built into each cylinder head to detect incipient pre-detonation and change the spark advance (via the ECU) to protect the engine. Sophisticated engines can do this individually by cylinder and highly-boosted engines will usually bleed a bit of inlet boost pressure at the same time.

Not relevant to three-wheelers I know! But there are very good reasons why some engines specify 98 Ron.



Actually very relevant to Three Wheelers Two Tribes, the S&S X-Wedge does have a knock sensor with it's ECU managed engine (page 8-4 item 20 of the S&S service manual). It works pretty well unless it is paired with a standard Morgan exhaust system when it cannot adjust the ignition enough to compensate for its very restrictive but compliant design.

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5