Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online Now
5 members (Image, MATTMOG, DJC, Ruut Bianchi, Oskar), 222 guests, and 37 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
John V6 79
+8Rich 69
DaveW 67
Luddite 55
Newest Members
Ulfulf, Wilfried, Classic-Line, BrunswickGreen44, Franco Morgan
9,203 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Supermax sprocket
by Laurens - 21/07/25 08:26 AM
Morgan 3 Wheeler song
by Dutch - 21/07/25 12:31 AM
Technical drawings, dimensions, 3D model M3W
by Oskar - 20/07/25 04:13 PM
Goggle eyed
by Roady - 19/07/25 06:16 PM
FOR SALE AERO8 series 1 WHEELS
by t50 - 19/07/25 12:07 PM
Lions Tour
by OZ 4/4 - 19/07/25 11:55 AM
Morgan rebuild on Facebook
by TBM - 19/07/25 10:50 AM
Latest Photos
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
by DaveK, July 19
Visit to the Factory- Historic Morgan Group
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,337
Posts812,913
Members9,203
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
toitoine
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,058
Likes: 20
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,058
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by HJF
I am a recent owner of a Trad’ 4/4. I am a professional aerospace engineer by background. At first I wasn’t so sure but have now bonded with my car. Ownership and a Factory Tour have left me with an impression of the Factory. I have the impression that they are very fine coach builders but are weak on the automotive, quality, and production engineering side. They are either lacking in engineering skills over all, or those they have are over stretched. On the Tour, looking at the CX cars (and there were very many in build, stacked everywhere) I suspect they have used some external agents to help with design and development which is unsurprising for a small firm trying to make a big step forward on many fronts in one go. But that in itself requires in house expertise to manage the suppliers and product and make sure it all integrates properly. I hope they get through what I suspect is a saga that will run on a bit longer yet.

Interesting post HJF


A Morgan Identified Fastidious Owner...
2011 4/4 Bespoke, 1981 Delorean, Auburn Boat Tail
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,865
Likes: 167
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,865
Likes: 167
We joke about waiting two years before buying a new model Morgan. We joked about letting the early buyers do the development work to iron out the bugs.

The M3W saga brought this sad truth home with an underdeveloped product, which at the same time still attracted a huge loyalty. But this was in the £30k arena.

Now we see the CX cars suffering from what may be under development, they are certainly not currently engineered to a sustainable level, and this is in three areas which we know about, all of which are tried and tested engineering categories, and should be reliable without question.

Hindsight shows us that initial concerns about a soft brake pedal were just the start of this saga. The squealing brakes and the fix of inverting the calipers was amusing, but an indicator of what some might regard as under development.

To a lesser extent we've seen some of this with the Trads. The Caparo calipers with ill fitting pads, which leave an unworn strip of pad material on the outside of the disc for example. This has not gone away. Nor has the potential for the plastic end tanks on those composite Trad radiators to crack and cause a rapid coolant loss. The weak rear spring saga was also something which, as Heinz said above, we assumed was because it's hard to find a manufacturer of quality leaf springs. This was also true for the MGB twenty years ago, It's maybe ironic that the things which are generally reliable on Trads, the chassis, the crosshead, and the kingpin/stub axle design are the very things regarded as old fashioned and a weakness, whereas the truth is that these components can be relied on to do their job day in day out.

Certainly when I restored my 17 year old MGB, the master cylinder, radiator and road springs were all fit to reuse. In fact I did reuse the front springs. The rest I replaced because I chose to.

Any car costing £90 should be reliable. It's sad to witness all of this unfolding as it is. The practices adopted by MMC to deal with the M3W issues won't work with cars costing three times as much.


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,058
Likes: 20
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,058
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by NZPlusSix
Interesting to hear that other Plus Six owners are experiencing the same problem of loss of ride height. At first we thought that the only worry was scrapping the muffler and the engine sump however when we sought a solution we were told (I repeat from another thread);

"One issue with the PlusSix, is that the springs, which are good quality, are made to competition principles.
By that I would consider the designs to be inadequately durable for road car use. Put simply they will collapse in service over time."

This could well be more serious than the present potential brake failure as having the suspension collapse when travelling at speed could be a real disaster!

In New Zealand we use our cars mainly for touring with cases on the luggage carrier (blame our wives for the load!) so we, four Plus Six owners, have decided to fit replacement SSL coil over damper units all round. These units are to have adjustable spring platforms so that should we loose ride height again then they can be adjusted back to give the original factory 135mm front and 155mm rear clearances.

I have contacted my UK dealer who passed our concern on to John Bower at MMC, but have not had a response from him. So we have pushed on and order replacement kits from SSL and they should be shipped in a couple of weeks.

It would be interesting to know as to how many Plus Sixes are affected by this problem and what their owners have done.


Just so we all have this correct, if the Morgan specified ground clearance at the rear is 155 mm and MOGcx now only has 70mm, the vehicle suspension has dropped 85mm in very short order....
really ?

Last edited by OZ 4/4; 30/07/22 11:18 AM.

A Morgan Identified Fastidious Owner...
2011 4/4 Bespoke, 1981 Delorean, Auburn Boat Tail
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 150
H
HJF Offline
L - Learner Plates On
Offline
L - Learner Plates On
H
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by OZ 4/4
Originally Posted by HJF
I am a recent owner of a Trad’ 4/4. I am a professional aerospace engineer by background. At first I wasn’t so sure but have now bonded with my car. Ownership and a Factory Tour have left me with an impression of the Factory. I have the impression that they are very fine coach builders but are weak on the automotive, quality, and production engineering side. They are either lacking in engineering skills over all, or those they have are over stretched. On the Tour, looking at the CX cars (and there were very many in build, stacked everywhere) I suspect they have used some external agents to help with design and development which is unsurprising for a small firm trying to make a big step forward on many fronts in one go. But that in itself requires in house expertise to manage the suppliers and product and make sure it all integrates properly. I hope they get through what I suspect is a saga that will run on a bit longer yet.

Interesting post HJF

Just to add to my comments above … I still do think they are a great little company with absolutely amazing products. When I did the Tour we were really impressed by all the people we spoke to, a fantastic experience. I’m sure they will get there and will be making every effort to get the product to perform as they intended and wish them all the best in doing so. They still have my support and will continue to do so.

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 91
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 91
Originally Posted by HJF
Originally Posted by OZ 4/4
Originally Posted by HJF
I am a recent owner of a Trad’ 4/4. I am a professional aerospace engineer by background. At first I wasn’t so sure but have now bonded with my car. Ownership and a Factory Tour have left me with an impression of the Factory. I have the impression that they are very fine coach builders but are weak on the automotive, quality, and production engineering side. They are either lacking in engineering skills over all, or those they have are over stretched. On the Tour, looking at the CX cars (and there were very many in build, stacked everywhere) I suspect they have used some external agents to help with design and development which is unsurprising for a small firm trying to make a big step forward on many fronts in one go. But that in itself requires in house expertise to manage the suppliers and product and make sure it all integrates properly. I hope they get through what I suspect is a saga that will run on a bit longer yet.

Interesting post HJF

Just to add to my comments above … I still do think they are a great little company with absolutely amazing products. When I did the Tour we were really impressed by all the people we spoke to, a fantastic experience. I’m sure they will get there and will be making every effort to get the product to perform as they intended and wish them all the best in doing so. They still have my support and will continue to do so.


+1
That's absolutely my interest as well, and as you said before, it's a great working team at MMC. They have their impressive skills. To add to this, I hope MMC is serious about not cutting corners on the purchase prices of parts like coil springs. These are exactly the corporate decisions that cannot be compensated by even the best craftsmanship and that are the responsibility of the purchasing department, not the excellent employees.


'14 4/4 graphite grey
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 87
Likes: 1
Just Getting Started
Offline
Just Getting Started
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 87
Likes: 1

Originally Posted by DaveW
We joke about waiting two years before buying a new model Morgan. We joked about letting the early buyers do the development work to iron out the bugs.

The M3W saga brought this sad truth home with an underdeveloped product, which at the same time still attracted a huge loyalty. But this was in the £30k arena.

Now we see the CX cars suffering from what may be under development, they are certainly not currently engineered to a sustainable level, and this is in three areas which we know about, all of which are tried and tested engineering categories, and should be reliable without question.

Hindsight shows us that initial concerns about a soft brake pedal were just the start of this saga. The squealing brakes and the fix of inverting the calipers was amusing, but an indicator of what some might regard as under development.

To a lesser extent we've seen some of this with the Trads. The Caparo calipers with ill fitting pads, which leave an unworn strip of pad material on the outside of the disc for example. This has not gone away. Nor has the potential for the plastic end tanks on those composite Trad radiators to crack and cause a rapid coolant loss. The weak rear spring saga was also something which, as Heinz said above, we assumed was because it's hard to find a manufacturer of quality leaf springs. This was also true for the MGB twenty years ago, It's maybe ironic that the things which are generally reliable on Trads, the chassis, the crosshead, and the kingpin/stub axle design are the very things regarded as old fashioned and a weakness, whereas the truth is that these components can be relied on to do their job day in day out.

Certainly when I restored my 17 year old MGB, the master cylinder, radiator and road springs were all fit to reuse. In fact I did reuse the front springs. The rest I replaced because I chose to.

Any car costing £90 should be reliable. It's sad to witness all of this unfolding as it is. The practices adopted by MMC to deal with the M3W issues won't work with cars costing three times as much.



And the Super 3?


Mike
1982 4/4
1999 +4
2004 Roadster S1
2010 Roadster S2
2021 Plus 6
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,865
Likes: 167
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,865
Likes: 167
I wouldn't touch a Super 3 for at least two years.................


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 40
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 40
Originally Posted by DaveW
I wouldn't touch a Super 3 for at least two years.................

Sage advice indeed. But with over 6 months since launch and even longer since they started taking deposits, it may well be a couple of years before any become available to the general public anyway!!


Doug
2011 Plus 4 in Rich Maroon

1972 750 “ComDom” sprinter
1958 Triton 650
1992 Triumph Trophy 900
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,892
Likes: 241
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,892
Likes: 241
Originally Posted by DaveW
I wouldn't touch a Super 3 for at least two years.................

I've sat in a static one, wiggled the steering and hummed "brrumm brrumm" does that count ?


Jon M
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 632
Likes: 6
S
Talk Morgan Regular
Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
S
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 632
Likes: 6
I am surprised that this happens to such expensive cars. Even the cheap Citroën 2CV never sagged that much, and even if they did the ride height was adjustable front and rear.

Harald


+4 4-seater 2008 Squadron Blue

Page 2 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5