Click here to return to the home page.
Classic Morgans
Who's Online Now
3 members (Rovert, Michael H, MogOnTheMove), 325 guests, and 42 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
John V6 70
DaveW 66
+8Rich 66
Newest Members
4199, GOFFO1965, Joske Vermeule, SBP17, Ulfulf
9,208 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Ozzy Osbourne
by Burgundymog - 22/07/25 08:28 PM
Super Three chain drive conversion
by Alastair - 22/07/25 04:18 PM
M3W - Anyone know this car?
by Biggle - 22/07/25 01:40 PM
S&S X Wedge Engine Gasket Source
by Morgan Dude - 22/07/25 02:13 AM
Supermax sprocket
by Laurens - 21/07/25 08:26 AM
Morgan 3 Wheeler song
by Dutch - 21/07/25 12:31 AM
Technical drawings, dimensions, 3D model M3W
by Oskar - 20/07/25 04:13 PM
Latest Photos
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
by DaveK, July 19
Visit to the Factory- Historic Morgan Group
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,341
Posts812,996
Members9,208
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
RedThree
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 468
Likes: 52
Learner Plates Off!
Offline
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 468
Likes: 52
Our ex 3.7 Roadster was Feb 2016 and definately had a galvanised chassis, so maybe this was spec'd to order.


Dave
Plus Six "Squeak"
Roadster departed.
1936 BSA Empire Star Q8. 1935 BSA W7-35. 1938 BSA M20
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 81
Likes: 1
Just Getting Started
Offline
Just Getting Started
Joined: Mar 2022
Posts: 81
Likes: 1
Seems a backwards step to stop galvanising chassis. Lucky my 2014 4/4 has one .


Kevin Davies
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 123
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 123
Originally Posted by Alpha1
Seems a backwards step to stop galvanising chassis. Lucky my 2014 4/4 has one .


+1

Ditto my 2014 4/4.


Paul
Costock, UK
2014 4/4 Rolls Royce Garnet Red
Disco 5
Teddy - 17h1 Irish Draught cross
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,748
Likes: 419
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,748
Likes: 419
+2 I guess driven by cost & environmental issues.


JohnV6
2022 CX Plus Four
2025 MG ZS EV aka Trigger
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 77
Likes: 11
Just Getting Started
Offline
Just Getting Started
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 77
Likes: 11
Hello

Quid chassis plus 4 of 2017 and 2018?
Galvanized or painted?
Thx

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,866
Likes: 167
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,866
Likes: 167
Almost certainly electrophoretic treated. This was standard from early 2016.

A few galvanised chassis were around through 2016 at extra cost, and unlikely to be dealer specced. So a slim chance of a 2017 being galvanised customer order, but little chance if 2018.


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 77
Likes: 11
Just Getting Started
Offline
Just Getting Started
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 77
Likes: 11
So between a plus 4 duratec of 2013 2014 and a GDI of 2017 2018 which is the best choice? Because there is 2 interest cars to sale in Germany.

Is those 2 engines have the VVT system and the same engine blok?

Thx

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 91
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 91
Personally, I would choose the older of the two offers if everything else is right. I have forgotten exactly when the GDI arrived. If the older car has a Duratec with intake manifold injection, it is not a VVT. But that wouldn't stop me from buying it. The older engines are very common in the tuning scene. Not only with Morgan. Have a look at Montegue's threads to get an idea of what you can do with the older Duratec. There is an ECU update for the GDI engine, but that's it. You can't change much. Ok, not every driver wants to change much about the engine, but I believe that the old Duratec is a very reliable engine, apart from its tuning potential. It's not a drunkard either. If you read the posts here, it's no more thirsty than the GDI. And there are no problems with coked valves due to the intake manifold injection.

I am talking about a potential problem. So far there are no reports of GDI drivers here in the forum who have had this problem.


'14 4/4 graphite grey
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 674
Likes: 60
S
Talk Morgan Regular
Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
S
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 674
Likes: 60
Yep, totally agree with Heinz. The indirect injection Duratec is the reliable one! All sorts of reasonably priced upgrades available too.

The racing world still use this option and lotus fit it in the 7's The direct injection Gdi squirts the fuel straight into the cylinder head whereas in the indirect injection the fuel is introduced into the inlet manifold which results in several advantages, probably too boring to go into fully here but simply the backs of the inlet and exhaust valves are constantly washed by the fuel/air mix which cools the valves and also washes the backs of them keeping them clean so this engine doesn't suffer from gummed up valves. I'm not sure but think that not all Gdi engines have VVT, perhaps just the later or Ltd. edition options fitted with the Mazda variant. but you will have to check that one out yourself!
The Gdi variant was developed for Ford America from the reliable and bombproof Duratec 2.0L and was fitted with a turbo charger, it quickly became known as the worst engine ford had ever made however in all fairness the non turbo version is better but! there are many cases of gummed up valves with as little as 3000 miles on the clock and its not a simple quick fix! and will become a regular expensive service issue. Many owners claim theirs is fine then they have a look and get a big shock.

Most of the crap causing this issue is from the Breather system and primarily from the crankcase breather which along with the rocker box breather is directed back into the inlet manifold where negative pressure helps to suck them back into the engine to be re-burnt helping to control emissions. directing the crankcase breather through a filtered oil catch system might help but it seems the jury is still out as the whether or not it still requires the negative pressure provided by the inlet manifold.. This would dictate whether or not you could then vent the crankcase to atmosphere after the filter or if the crankcase needs to have the aided vacuum, returned to the inlet manifold.
A vent to atmosphere might also cause an MOT issue so should be easily reversed back! New or low milage engines don't usually suffer with engine blow by and it seems that introducing a catch can system to the rocker box vent is probably a waste of time unless you are constantly working the engine hard such as in racing.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5