7 members (HeadlessBlue, B3MOG, DJC, Tresco, jbk, MartinB60, Ian Wegg),
311
guests, and
35
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums34
Topics48,337
Posts812,913
Members9,203
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,422 Likes: 5
Goodwood Drifter Talk Morgan Addict
|
OP
Goodwood Drifter Talk Morgan Addict
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,422 Likes: 5 |
I have heard more than once that there are bits of TOK on quite a few Mogs, many of which claim to have provenance and are priced accordingly.
How many different Mogs were fitted with the TOK 258 number plate? I had a RoadsterV6 wit number-plate TOK258
Steven sold: M3W, Aeromax,V6, 4/4 4seater now: +fourLM62
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 350
Learner Plates Off!
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 350 |
The TOK idenity issue keeps confusing all. A few facts....According to factory build sheets a Mr Lawrence took delivery of a hi-line SS chassis 4840, engine no 2537HR in June 1961.This can be verified by Ken Hills book 'Completely Morgan. Four wheelers 1936 to 1968'published by Veloce 1994. It would almost certainly have been delivered with the 1991cc motor(more on that later) as were most hi-line cars.It was the 5th SS built/delivered and the 2nd rhd. Because of Mr Lawrences wish to succeed in the 1962 race he felt it should have a low line body(less drag) as per the current 4/4 model. Peter Morgan always preferred the hi body and was not keen to change it but CL 'obtained' a low line body and the rest is history...as it turned out Peter Morgan was requested by buyers of the SS after the 62 Le Mans to build all cars from then on with the low-line...Im sure the 4 seaters(5) retained the hi-line until end of production in 1968. So the car listed in the Silverstone auction this Friday maybe very kosher but it does not have its original engine as the class Morgan won in 1962 was the under 2000cc class and it would(should..or who checked?)have run the 1991 engine. Other posters comments on what really is TOK 258 or how many TOK 258's are there is a very contentous proposition. Maybe Herman Pol should give his view. I own chassis 4749 the first SS built. Actually, I think the engine in Chassis 4840 is the original engine. My 1961 Plus 4 Four-seater is Chassis 4850, only 10 chassis later. My engine number is TS82122ME. According to the auction publicity, the engine number for #4840 is TS32115HE, but I think the examiner misread 3 for 8 and H for M. If so, the actual number for the engine in #4840 is TS82115ME, which is seven numbers before mine. In those days TR engines were delivered in batches of about thirty and installed in no particular order. So these two engines were probably in the same batch -- TS82122ME went to chassis 4850 and has powered a four-seater around America, while TS82115ME went to chassis 4840 and LeMans glory. The auction brochure lists the engine capacity as 2138cc (TR4 capacity) rather than 1991 cc (TR3 capacity). However, the engine number has the suffix "TS" which denotes a TR3 engine -- the TR4 engines have the suffix "CT". The obvious answer is that 4840's TR3 engine was rebuilt with a TR4 wet-liner set. My TR3 engine was rebuilt in 1971 with the TR4 liners, and it's impossible to tell without removing the cylinder head. Everyone who rebuilds a TR3 engine uses the TR4 liners, unless he wants to race in the under-2-liter class. I assume that 4840's engine was fitted with TR3 liners in the day it won the under-2-litre class, but has since been fitted with the larger TR4 liners to give it even more speed.
Last edited by MacMog; 05/05/12 12:04 AM. Reason: typo
1961 +4 Four seater
"Crude, but effective."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 350
Learner Plates Off!
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 350 |
ooops! In the above post I used the term "suffix" when I ment "prefix". Thus, my sentence above should have read:
"However, the engine has the prefix "TS" which denotes a TR3 engine -- the TR4 engines have the prefix "CT". "
The SUFFIX refers of course to the letters at the end of the engine number. On Triumph engines the suffix for engines sent to Morgan was "ME". For Triumph engines used in Triumph cars the suffix as simply "E".
If Hill says that 4840's engine was 2537HR, this would not seem to fit the regular Triumph numbering system. Was this a Lawrencetune number?
1961 +4 Four seater
"Crude, but effective."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13
New to Talk Morgan
|
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13 |
and oopps from me. The # 2537HR refers to the gearbox. The engine # in Mr Hills book for ch 4840 is listed as 82061 The SS built after chassis 4840 was chassis 4862 and it had engine 82114, so it is strange that 4840 in Hills book has a earlier number..maybe he had obtained it and was working on it before 4840 was built...it(engine) would have been built early in the 1961 year. Not sure if any of this explains the present engine in 4840. Hermen Pol where are you?
+4SS 1961 Aston Martin DB5 Defender 110 Chrysler Woody Wagon 2CV Forester STi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 462
Learner Plates Off!
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 462 |
It's good to have the Triumph engine numbers experts here!
Perhaps one of you has an idea for the following. My friend owns the 1953 +4 DHC which reputedly was used by Chris Lawrence for testing his developments. The engine in the car has still a Lawrencetune inlet manifold with 2 Weber DCOE carburetors and the cylinder head seems to be "special" too, as is the exhaust manifold. The engine number is simply X 773 E. A Chris Lawrence number?? A Triumph number?? Reconditioned engine??
Frank
1967 4/4 1500 Comp. 1935 Super Sports Barrelback
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 350
Learner Plates Off!
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 350 |
"Perhaps one of you has an idea for the following. My friend owns the 1953 +4 DHC which reputedly was used by Chris Lawrence for testing his developments. The engine in the car has still a Lawrencetune inlet manifold with 2 Weber DCOE carburetors and the cylinder head seems to be "special" too, as is the exhaust manifold. The engine number is simply X 773 E. A Chris Lawrence number?? A Triumph number?? Reconditioned engine?? Frank"
Hello, Frank. You have a tough question, but I'll give it a try because I also have a 1953 +4. I assume your friend's 1953 DHC is a flat rad, and not a curved-grill model made in late 1953, which would be 1954 model year. Do you know his Chassis Number?
My 1953 +4 is chassis P2629 with engine V559ME. The prefix V denotes Vanguard, which was Standard-Triumph's best-selling large car at the time. According to Ken Hill's The Four-wheeled Morgan, Vol.1 p.44, the last 1953 Flat rad was Chassis P2756 or P2761. All cars made afterward had Triumph engines (with a prefix TS) except some of the DHCs which could get a Vanguard engine as an option. There were 658 Plus 4 flatrads made betwwn 1950 and 1953, and their engines were numbered from V1ME to about V700ME. Thus, your friend's engine numbered X 773 E is outside the range of numbers for original 1953 Plus 4s. Also, the suffix E would usually mean the engine was installed in a Standard-Triumph car, while the suffix ME was used for engines sent to Morgan. My best guess is that this engine X 773 E was one of the Vanguard engines that was supplied to Morgan to be used as an option on DHCs in 1954 and 1955. In this event the actual number should be V773ME. Is your friend sure that the X is not really a V, and that there isn't a weakly-struck M between the 3 and the E?
But I have a question: Why would Chris Lawrence use a 1953 DHC as a test vehicle, when it is slower, heavier, and more expensive than a roadster?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 514 Likes: 1
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 514 Likes: 1 |
Not sure whether this helps on the engine number, but the X prefix on the TR range is supposed to identify a works experimental engine.
Malcolm T 1966 +4 1957 TR3 1963 TR4 1983 LR 110 1985 Robin Hood 2.0l
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,440 Likes: 8
Has a lot to Say!
|
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,440 Likes: 8 |
Probably the second most famous +4 SS is up for sale - the one restored by John Worrall. A mere snip at £90,000 !! I always drooled over the photographs of this car in Worrall's excellent book, "Original Morgan" http://www.perranwell.co.uk/index.php/news
Last edited by Quicksilver; 10/05/12 03:25 PM.
David 2020 Roadster 3.7 Dove Grey.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,553 Likes: 88
Talk Morgan Guru
|
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,553 Likes: 88 |
Drool drool  Bud __________ 2003 - 4/4
Bud 4/4 "Stanley"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13
New to Talk Morgan
|
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 13 |
seems like a very fair price...very good provenance.
+4SS 1961 Aston Martin DB5 Defender 110 Chrysler Woody Wagon 2CV Forester STi
|
|
|
|
|