Still quite new to Morganeering and MSCC, but I'm not really stimulated by Miscellany (mainly for the reasons already cited above) and
doesn't even pick it up.
There are exceptions, I read DaveW's column (because it is informative), the Chairman's report (because he might ask us if we've read it at the next Noggin!) and the various adverts. But many of the articles are sadly a bit of a
I did read the 4/4 vs MX5 article this month:
Balance? I think not... Unbiased? I think not... Rose tinted? May be...
Trying to redress the recent motoring journalists ramblings about the new Plus 8 and 3.7 Roadster? May be...
Miscellany could and should be a much better publication, and it deserves to be so.
As the contributions to TM amply demonstrate the technical knowledge base and enthusiasm is out there to support a first rate, vibrant publication. Who knows, with just a little more contributory effort from MMC in supporting technical queries and listening to feedback in Miscellany, we could even all reap benefits in product quality and development...
MZ
