So, is it the case then, that low frequency = high damping/low deflection. But high frequency provides less (softer) damping and more deflection? Which will theoretically reduce harshness on irregular surfaces - because that sounds promising.
Where would a conventional damper sit within this range? I'm curious, because my AVO's on the softest setting (which I'm thinking will be similar to the 'high frequency' end) result in what is best described as front end 'float' over irregular surfaces, whereas on four clicks the ride is much harder, but without being uncomfortable - which I'm supposing would be closer to the low frequency end.
If high frequency damping needs additional travel, is this achievable given the Mogs limited avaiable suspension travel without bottoming, or coil binding on the front end?
