I remain confused, now we have another figure (107) for the number of Aeromaxs built.
If a magazine that seeks to be authoritative chooses to include production numbers in a feature article in order to give it extra gravitas then surely it has a responsibility to make sure that the figures it quotes have been gleaned from a reputable source that it identifies. If the magazine chooses not to do this then maybe a letter of complaint to the editor would be a good thing.
I must immediately add, I am not the right person to write it.
