I agree with Frank and Simon. I have not owned a Morgan for very long, but I realise and fully accept that the quality you can expect from a handbuilt car is never going to match that of a robot-built, mass produced car. Even if it costs 100k, its made by people who can make mistakes no matter how skilled and motivated they are, I considder it part of the charm. The basic design and engineering of the car should be sound because its been around for so long. And if a company like Morgan goes into rapid development of new models, with very limited facilities for testing, you would expect a few hickups in the basics as well. Maybe they should have taken more time to develop and test? Time will tell. There is no point spreading negativity based on rumours or conjecture. On the other hand if customers have (serious) issues with their cars you would expect the dealers and/or the factory to make sure that the customer is not out of pocket. The "cracked windscreen issue" is a good example and I think (constructive) criticism on such issues adds a lot of value to this forum. It could/should also be of value to MMC, because although we accept the cars are not perfect, they can be improved. What I am trying to say in too many words; negativity on the forum bad, constructive criticism good!!.
Cheers J
