Isabel Oakeshott would seem to be very skilled in argument and I very much doubt if she would ever make any move that would other than advantage herself... She perhaps displayed a bit of her true self on Daily Politics when the panel discussion was if I remember correctly on cuts to welfare payments (?) or somesuch and Oakeshott retorted that "they", do not need to buy Lurpak, perhaps in reference to those on welfare ?.... Kinda smacked of "let them eat cake" as was declared in times past by someone who paid the price for that sort of attitude...?
Happy to be corrected if I picked that up incorrectly..
