Originally Posted By Lance
Originally Posted By Boshly
The best way to keep rumors going is to keep repeating them!

What we have on this site is at least four owners and many more who have driven the cars in the real world! And many who have good contacts within the MMC family that can be quoted.

If you have an experience to recount, do so. And please quote sources. It helps justify (or refute) as appropriate. As long as its 'factual', we'll listen. As for 'rumours' and innuendo.....



Oh by the way, I heard a rumor that there are some very bitter and twisted people in small corners of the Morgan world. Honestly Guv!


I mentioned a couple of issues I had heard, and two of them have been confirmed in this thread, unpleasantly noisy bevel box, observed by someone who had just driven one at the factory, and Mike Duncans car back at the works for charging problems. Facts

I wondered how long it would take you to come out with the name calling, so predictable.


No you didn't Lance, what you said was:

"Have been hearing rumors of cars going back to the works with issues of hard starting, not charging, very loud bevel boxes , and corrosion."

As for Mike Duncan's car, that was posted here AFTER you posted. It may have been posted elsewhere beforehand but I can't recall.

That Is rumour mongering of the finest. As Simon very clearly stated, it's starting your 'contribution' with a negative, and I feel it's intentional, though of course that's my opinion only.

If you had said "I understand Mike Duncan's car has had ......" and/or "I read on XYZ that so and so's car has a noisy bevel box, is this typical? Can any of the owners shed any light?" or words to that effect it old ave been perceived very differently. But you state no facts, just conjecture, and IMHO exaggerated conjecture, dramatic conjecture. Why can't you just stick to facts or verifiable sources? That's all.

As for "the name calling" why are you you upset? I was simply re-stating a rumour??

Cheers

BtG