9 members (nick w, ChrisCB53, +8Rich, vbalddave, James B W, IcePack, CooperMan, John V6, Mr.Tennant),
311
guests, and
36
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
SORN
by OldSkrote - 31/07/25 02:07 PM
|
New
by Rex_tulips - 30/07/25 07:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums34
Topics48,368
Posts813,420
Members9,215
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 870
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 870 |
I thought I was posing an interesting question. Evidently I was mistaken. It is an interesting question. I just don't have the answer. It was also great to read about someone having great fun in it.
Last edited by AQM; 28/08/13 08:10 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,597
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,597 |
I remember when I bought my first Morgan, the 44 Sport. The literature remained blank or "to be confirmed" when it came to performance figures. I don't think they ever got round to declaring a figure, never mind detailed performance. I firmly believe the figures that have appeared over the years are questionable, my roadster was described as 4.9s to 60. More closer to 6 I would think. 5th Gear did a comparison with performance v the manufacturers literature and big margins were apparent. So the interesting answer is "would you believe it if it was in print"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,461
Has a lot to Say!
|
OP
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,461 |
I remember when I bought my first Morgan, the 44 Sport. The literature remained blank or "to be confirmed" when it came to performance figures. I don't think they ever got round to declaring a figure, never mind detailed performance. I firmly believe the figures that have appeared over the years are questionable, my roadster was described as 4.9s to 60. More closer to 6 I would think. 5th Gear did a comparison with performance v the manufacturers literature and big margins were apparent. So the interesting answer is "would you believe it if it was in print" This is a good point. Manufacturers' test cars are still, shall we say, well prepared... However, I do not believe that the exaggerated preparation methods of the past, such as Jaguar's first 3.8-type which could do a genuine 150mph (unlike the cars that the public bought) or Lotus's practice of installing blueprinted engines in press cars, etc, etc, are as widespread these days. For one thing, manufacturing tolerances are much tighter now than they were only a couple of decades ago. Anyway, if a reputable magazine produced a full set of figures, at least that would give an idea.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,664
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,664 |
As stated earlier, once Krazy Horse gets their rolling road up and running for the 3 wheeler, someone will release figures. It's only a matter of time.
Charlie, Former Editor Morgan Owners Group - Great Lakes
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,461
Has a lot to Say!
|
OP
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,461 |
Thanks for posting that, Mr Jive T. The standing quarter-mile time (16.1sec) is quite a useful indicator.
Good enough to blow away a Golf GTI (the original 1976 version).
Last edited by P Dron; 31/08/13 04:08 PM.
|
|
|
|
|