Hi Lorne
There are so many points that I could address but I really dont have the time. Of course in my inimtable style I cannot resist pointing out one or two
Firstly:For those who find his distasteful rant of interest, Wolfie is right.
Once again a slight twist to emphasise a point that wasnt there?
Wolfie actually said:
..but not as grumpy as bosly on pistonheads..what was all that about?
IMHO of course, Wolfie was enquiring why I was so grumpy, as due to your selective editing your obnoxious (again IMHO of course) comment was erased.
Secondly: His hatred of MMC and Aero's is renowned and that is enough to get my back up but the two subtle digs about TM were
completely below the belt.
What dig are referring to?
I don't know Lorne???

what 'digs' must have I been referring to? Read others comments if you are still unsure.
Thirdly (oops sorry guys

):
For those who cant be bothered to look for my comments (dont blame you guys) I quote below my "Hostile attack" on Simon form that PH thread
Thanks all.

People are protective of PH for which I'm graetful - many people have invested a lot of time in it, not just me

The point is that it's a bit cheeky to go onto any forum and suggest that people go elsewhere. It's a bit like walking into a pub and saying "Hey everyone, come round my house with some tinnies instead".
[footnote] Edited by PetrolTed on Thursday 31st August 13:22[/footnote]
Well done Ted for not pulling the thread.

Though would have understood if you had.
PH is more than just a forum in my humble opinion and I for one like it here. There is always an inetersting debate, something to laugh at or someone to help you. Keeps me amused anyway. I also think the PH Aero section is just getting more interesting and fun - roll on Sunday the 10th. :driving:
Sorry Nomis, whilst I fully understand that your intentions may be good, cant help a bit of cynicism. I feel that once it gets busy you wont be able to resist some advertising revenue. Nothing wrong with that, but if it does go that way would be a tad hypocritical.
Anyhow I didnt really want to antagonise a fellow Aero driver. I also feel sure this may not have been an intentional attack just maybe a slight oversight.
You never know I may pop in one day and have a look

Will need to be PDA friendly though!
Andy
Poor Simon must have had nightmares for weeks after that. Maybe it was the follow-up equally "hostile attack" that really pushed poor Simon to the edge:
Although in fairness, the Morgan brand (dealers) and the surrounding companies are hardly a cash cow waiting to me milked, so even if I was thinking about that, it would take me years to even get back my costs! lol

:hehe:
As for Ted, as someone else said, Talk Morgan is hardly a threat as I can't imagine his core users group is Traditional Morgan owners (from the Forums, it would seem to be TVR and the modern sports car brands). Even so, I did say I was happy for him to delete the thread - and would understand 100%, without any ill-feelings - but he was professional and mature enough to leave it.

My sentiments entirely, and probably should have added you have subsequently also acted profesionally and maturely regarding the whole debate.
FYI info just visited the site (and posted :paperbag: )

Cheers
Andy
Nuff said?
Fourthly We try to support TalkMorgan and any Morgan owner in that area always.
Yes I saw that in your 'helpful' response to AsboJohns helpful comment....
Fifthly (I really am sorry now

:
We of course are growing nicely) and as an 'Aero'
site.
In fact, you list 35 Aeros out amongst 500+ trad owners. That that makes it a trad site.
But what I actually said was:
He resents TM as competition (..."comments about how you run your site"...) and as an 'Aero' site.
Of course my comments in the brackets could have confused you, but more likely I think, as an intelligent guy, you saw what I said but somehow it ended up being misquoted
Lastly 
His MO is evident in his response to mine, erase the statement I quoted then ask 'innocently' what did I do to upset you? Well if you didn't erase the obvious snide comment you wouldn't need to ask. In a thread forum this is still obvious by scrolling up but he ismore used to -mail forums where this selective editing also adds to the underhand manner. All IMHO of course
"re-editing" is not possible on eMog. It is possible here. I am not sure what you are getting at...
The poor 'innocent' Lorne, confused again.
I am "getting at" your selective editing. Mis-quoting to suit your own purposes. You went to the effort of quoting my whole tirade
*, but also ensured that you erased your crass and careless comments to Asbojons response to play the 'little boy hurt' and engender sympathy.
(
*yes I accept it was a tirade - but before you quote the dictionary definition, the 'angry' rather than 'violent' type)
However I appreciate its pointless, I realise, you have done it before, you will do it again. I called you to task on it here before and on PH but a fruitles task on my behalf as it's is your greatest weapon (wry smile) followed of course by your 'poor little Lorne' act (sigh)
Anyhow, it would seem you have more time on your hands than me (an opportunity for you there for a sly subtle dig

). So I will leave it there.
We will never see eye to eye. I will admire your knowledge and experience; and I do read it often including on Emog and Gomog (I am regsitered

). BTW The instruments you posted up on the thread in question are truly beautiful. Not sure about the polished engine block, a bit 'hot rod' for me, but the instruments and cluster are stunning.
Anyhow, as I said, I will continue to read, and if I feel you have said something I dis-agree with I will respond in my usual manner. I will try not to be rude but I will undoubtedley be firm in my response.
Cheers
Boshly (the Great)