Forums34
Topics48,341
Posts812,996
Members9,208
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,673 Likes: 25
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
OP
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,673 Likes: 25 |
Just pootling around t'internet and came across this on the Garage 56 facebook page.  The notes say: A mono swing arm, to allow quick wheel changes. Not to mention a new spring/damper (twice the rate), and possibly a revised left hand fuel tank, if we need a fat section arm (which this is). The arm needs to sneak between the pulley and the rim, really... Not sure if this is something they are actively developing or just a bit of blue-sky doodling... I'd certainly be interested. Seems daft to incur several hours of workshop labour just to remove the back wheel.
Andy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,673 Likes: 25
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
OP
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,673 Likes: 25 |
 Not sure how belt tension would be adjusted though...
Andy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,562
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,562 |
 Not sure how belt tension would be adjusted though... Simple jockey pulley fixed to the new swing arm , with screw adjustment would make belt tentioning a doddle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,673 Likes: 25
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
OP
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,673 Likes: 25 |
Yes, I guess it doesn't need to be complicated. Simple belt tensioner
Andy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,776 Likes: 59
Talk Morgan Expert
|
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,776 Likes: 59 |
Just use an eccentric hub like most single side swingarm bikes use. Does change the ride height a bit as you adjust tension but not a great problem unless you change gearing a lot as well. Think you'd have to brace up the single shock top mounting point to take the additional loadings into the chassis. Could probably use a bike rear disk assembly but a handbrake would take some organising. Don't think I'd want the extra grip at the back that a fatter tyre would give. Got a feeling that if they were to go ahead with it the price would be seriously painful; brace up the chassis, the new shock, new swingarm, new hub and brake assembly plus new rear wheel to suit then a new left fuel tank to accommodate the larger box section of the arm. Could pay for a lot of workshop hours! Worst of all, all that beautifully done engineering would be completely hidden unlike doing a conversion on a bike where it is primarily a cosmetic exercise!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 797
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 797 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 41
Just Getting Started
|
Just Getting Started
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 41 |
Not my images: The swing arm from a Polaris Slingshot. Also not my kind of 3 wheeler regardless of any engineering advantages. Looks like the fetal love child of a old Saab and a transformer.  
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,673 Likes: 25
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
OP
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,673 Likes: 25 |
I agree 100% about the styling but that Slingshot swingarm looks the business. Proper engineering. And we shouldn't forget that you can buy a whole Slingshot for $20,000!
Andy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 782
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 782 |
Nice idea, but subject to high stresses and strains. Perhaps they'll test it to find out if it works before selling it...??
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 18
New to Talk Morgan
|
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 18 |
You are quite right, BunnyBoy, the back end was a poor design and when the new improved model comes along let's hope for some changes. As you suggest, a rear mono swing-arm (used by BSA three-wheelers in 1929, albeit with a fraction of the stress), a duplex chain in an oil-bath case to replace the belt drive and a brake on the bevel-box, opposite end to the sprocket, instead of the rear wheel to reduce unsprung weight would be my on my list.
|
|
|
|
|