Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online Now
1 members (mph), 251 guests, and 33 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 99
John V6 57
Newest Members
phenompilot52, Orjan, John Courtney, vince Indiana US, Garage Andreas
9,635 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Eurotunnel – is it a Car or Motorcycle?
by Chris99 - 13/09/26 05:44 PM
Body Mounting Bolts
by M3WMW - 13/09/26 02:02 PM
What Matt Humphries has been up to
by Bunny - 13/09/26 10:01 AM
Contributions to the forum
by +8Rich - 13/09/26 07:47 AM
small hose from air cleaner - 1989
by Carbuilder - 12/09/26 04:50 PM
New member in NYC
by SEG - 12/09/26 04:13 PM
Door card removal ?
by Pittsartist - 12/09/26 11:35 AM
Latest Photos
New to me 95 plus 4 daily driver
New to me 95 plus 4 daily driver
by SailingTom2, September 12
Bits to give away
Bits to give away
by TigerTim, September 11
1989 Morgan Plus 4 in Ontario, Canada
1989 Morgan Plus 4 in Ontario, Canada
by Carbuilder, September 5
First anniversary of Plus 4
First anniversary of Plus 4
by Strathaven, September 5
Wales
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,911
Posts838,148
Members9,635
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
dogmanjack, Frabro
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#30447 04/06/09 11:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 375
109er Offline OP
Learner Plates Off!
OP Offline
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 375
Folks,

is there anyone interested in bringing a new shock absorber system into the market? We are talking about a shock absorber with frequency dependent damping rate. High damping rate at low frequencies, low damping rate at higher frequencies. Such a system is patented by Koni and apparently used by McLaren in F1.

We have a new approach which has been figured out by a retired engineer in shock absorber development. The first mock-up has successfully been tested on a hydropulser. We see a switch in damping rates around 3-4 Hz.

First possible applications could be race cars or motorbikes, maybe even bicyles.

Any suggestions would be welcome,

Andy


Andreas

+4
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 42
R
Talk Morgan Addict
Offline
Talk Morgan Addict
R
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,482
Likes: 42
To the uninitiated, what does this mean in the real world?? - Will these shocks give a better ride or will they give better road holding? or whatever --I.E. Why should we be interested?? I don't mean to be in any way rude, I just am not competent to interpret what your post means!!!

Regards from a Sunny Ireland!


Robbie
2021 Plus Four -- Helga
211-WX-1433

"Fettlebodge"--A chief of the PaddyMogs
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 375
109er Offline OP
Learner Plates Off!
OP Offline
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 375
Robbie,
they should give better roadholding.
Low frequencies appear on uneven roads (undulations), upon cornering, breaking and so on. If the damping rate is high under these conditions, the ground clearance and the leveling of the car can be maintained within close limits.
To the contrary, higher frequencies occur at higher speeds due to imperfections of the road surface for example like edges between two adjacent surfaces. A low damping rate is desirable to keep these frequencies away from the chassis. To a race car that means that such influence is not introduced into the tyre alone or into the chassis, but is absorbed in the shock absorber. This should indeed improve the roadholding because you no longer have to find a compromise for a single damping rate addressing these two conditions. And it works without electronics which is essential to most race formulas.
I posted this because I´d like to see ideas for applications and maybe someone is interested in developing or using a first prototype, if there are race enthusiasts around. Or any technical comments, maybe.
And I´m not offended in any way.
Greetings from sunny and cold Germany,
Andy


Andreas

+4
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,103
Retrobate
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Retrobate
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,103
Would be interested in a finished and proved product, but only at that stage.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 145
C
L - Learner Plates On
Offline
L - Learner Plates On
C
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 145
I could be interested in testing them on a Plus 8, Andy. If you want to take it further, could you PM me technical details?

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,371
Likes: 354
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,371
Likes: 354
So, is it the case then, that low frequency = high damping/low deflection. But high frequency provides less (softer) damping and more deflection? Which will theoretically reduce harshness on irregular surfaces - because that sounds promising.
Where would a conventional damper sit within this range? I'm curious, because my AVO's on the softest setting (which I'm thinking will be similar to the 'high frequency' end) result in what is best described as front end 'float' over irregular surfaces, whereas on four clicks the ride is much harder, but without being uncomfortable - which I'm supposing would be closer to the low frequency end.
If high frequency damping needs additional travel, is this achievable given the Mogs limited avaiable suspension travel without bottoming, or coil binding on the front end?


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 375
109er Offline OP
Learner Plates Off!
OP Offline
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 375
Dave,

- So, is it the case then, that low frequency = high damping/low deflection. But high frequency provides less (softer) damping and more deflection? Which will theoretically reduce harshness on irregular surfaces - because that sounds promising. -

Yes, exactly, I couldn´t describe it better. And as far as I know, there is no such damper commercially available yet. Only KONI are producing one for a race team, and this one has frequency-dependency only in one direction of travel.

It would be great to figure out a way to produce these dampers, but that is a long way. Maybe I can convince someone to enter production if I have a good application. I thought of Morgan, Lotus etc.

I don´t think they need additional travel because the high frequency influence usually have a small amplitude.

Andy

Last edited by 109er; 05/06/09 11:47 AM.

Andreas

+4
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 123
Y
L - Learner Plates On
Offline
L - Learner Plates On
Y
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 123
I think this is good idea.Ready to invest.

Yuri #30520 06/06/09 05:38 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 234
C
L - Learner Plates On
Offline
L - Learner Plates On
C
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 234
In my motorbike riding days I had a BMW K100RS 16 valve, the standard shock was dreadful and in the end I got a French Fournales shock, this uses air over oil and seemed to work quite well, we have some awful road surfaces over here and at illegal speeds the back end bounce made riding uncomfortable, I could go for the fournales system on the Morgan but I did have to have a special high pressure pump which is the tough part as the shocks are hidden under a car but in your face on a bike. so pumping the things up could be difficult

The front on a Morgan can be a little underdamped, one section of road between L'Orient and Vannes in Brittany could make you seasick, even wife noticed the St Malverns dance, would the front not upset the rear?


Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5