Click here to return to the home page.
Classic Morgans
Who's Online Now
4 members (PaulG, MJF, Adam12, 1560), 290 guests, and 38 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 64
Adam12 62
John V6 58
Newest Members
Chris Ontario, NickMog, YellowM, Dufty, Anted4
9,215 Registered Users
Newest Topics
For Sale 2015 M3W - £23,000
by MOG42 - 29/07/25 06:28 PM
AC Cobra Rep. Vs Plus 8
by Richardllll - 29/07/25 04:40 PM
Me Again
by Whizjet - 29/07/25 03:13 PM
Tyre dates on Yokohama tyres
by SteveMerch - 29/07/25 12:39 PM
Aero 8 Maintenance
by mph - 29/07/25 09:24 AM
Pur Sang Type 35
by BillHart - 28/07/25 06:49 PM
Tom Lehrer RIP
by Hamwich - 28/07/25 06:30 AM
Latest Photos
2015 M3W for sale
2015 M3W for sale
by MOG42, July 29
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
by DaveK, July 19
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,362
Posts813,325
Members9,215
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009
Originally Posted By AJSki2fly
Not interested in axle to ground but actual ground clearance Jays, as this is Jochens issue. I was trying to compare mine with his and then we can work out where the difference is apart from the tyre difference.


I realise that.....all I meant to say was that due to springs being different, it's a pointless exercise comparing your car to his in that way. The difference in height of the tyre profiles is more relevant.


Jays
Former Morgan owner. Gone but hopefully not forgotten!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127
numog Offline OP
Has a lot to Say!
OP Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127
cheers thank you my dear Ladies (?) and Gentlemen for all your very welcomed advices! notworthy

BUT: what my (car´s!) "problem" is: MMC did fit a wrong (at least according to all written stuff i found & imho) tyre size on my current Roadster, resulting in ca. 10mm less ground clearance than possible (& VERY desirable! frown2 ).

Their "cure" is issuing me a new CoC to make their mistake look right... thinking

What i just really wanted to know whether any RECENT (so -later- 2015) Roadster 3.7 here (equipped with the black 6,5x15" wire wheels) has been fitted with 205/60-15s from the production.

So any "late 2015" Roadster owner is (please!) needed now! slap cheers thumbs


It doesn´t matter how fast it becomes, but how it becomes fast. laugh2
drive 2015 Roadster 3.7
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127
numog Offline OP
Has a lot to Say!
OP Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127
Originally Posted By DaveW
Would /65 fit in the spare hole?
Have you tested it?
It does sound a bit marginal although the curved sidewall will help. Because an odd sized spare & LSD are not good bedfellows.


Hello Dave,

yes sir, it does ("they all do that sir!"). oldgit

MMC manufactures only ONE current spare wheel aperture size on their 2-str. bodies, so all of their standard sized spare wheel does fit in - neatly(-ish) ... i had them all ... laugh2


It doesn´t matter how fast it becomes, but how it becomes fast. laugh2
drive 2015 Roadster 3.7
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 149
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 149
Method of comparing rear springs independent of tyre size and pressure.

I needed a method of comparing the ride height of the chassis regardless of the type of wheels and tyres fitted to the two cars being compared. This exercise was so that I could judge one set of springs against another but it could also be used for other purposes, such as the effect of a load of touring luggage etc. Getting under the car and measuring the distance between say the bottom of the chassis and the axle is not easy unless you have a pit or you can raise the car on a lift that lefts under the wheels. Even then you have to be sure all 4 wheels are on a level plane. After a bit of thought I came up with the following method.

The following measurements are from my car which is fitted with the older type 5 leaf rear springs.

Fuel about one quarter of a tank. No other load on board.

The car must be on an absolutely level surface. Before measuring I tried to bounce the car a little on its springs to get the dampers to settle. I discovered it is actually not easy to get any movement but I probably got enough to do the trick.

First I measured the rolling radius of the 195/60 R15 tyres by measuring from the hub centres to the ground. A small point made with a marking pen on the centre of the wheel nut would probably help. They averaged to 292 mm I did not worry about pressure but it was probably about 24 psi. It is not really important for the calculation I have in mind. There was actually 2 mm difference between left and right (slightly different pressure??).

The height of the lower chassis rail measured near the wheels was average 174 mm (there was 2 mm difference left and right due to the tyres, in other words the springs were amazingly equal)

By deducting the 174 from 292 we get 118 mm which is the height difference between the centre of the axle and the bottom of the chassis rail. This can then be compared to another car that has been measured using the same system.


Peter

[Linked Image]
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5