|
4 members (PaulG, MJF, Adam12, 1560),
290
guests, and
38
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums34
Topics48,362
Posts813,325
Members9,215
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009 |
Not interested in axle to ground but actual ground clearance Jays, as this is Jochens issue. I was trying to compare mine with his and then we can work out where the difference is apart from the tyre difference. I realise that.....all I meant to say was that due to springs being different, it's a pointless exercise comparing your car to his in that way. The difference in height of the tyre profiles is more relevant.
Jays Former Morgan owner. Gone but hopefully not forgotten!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127
Has a lot to Say!
|
OP
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127 |
 thank you my dear Ladies (?) and Gentlemen for all your very welcomed advices!  BUT: what my (car´s!) "problem" is: MMC did fit a wrong (at least according to all written stuff i found & imho) tyre size on my current Roadster, resulting in ca. 10mm less ground clearance than possible (& VERY desirable!  ). Their "cure" is issuing me a new CoC to make their mistake look right... What i just really wanted to know whether any RECENT (so -later- 2015) Roadster 3.7 here (equipped with the black 6,5x15" wire wheels) has been fitted with 205/60-15s from the production. So any "late 2015" Roadster owner is (please!) needed now!
It doesn´t matter how fast it becomes, but how it becomes fast.  2015 Roadster 3.7
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127
Has a lot to Say!
|
OP
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,127 |
Would /65 fit in the spare hole? Have you tested it? It does sound a bit marginal although the curved sidewall will help. Because an odd sized spare & LSD are not good bedfellows. Hello Dave, yes sir, it does ("they all do that sir!"). MMC manufactures only ONE current spare wheel aperture size on their 2-str. bodies, so all of their standard sized spare wheel does fit in - neatly(-ish) ... i had them all ...
It doesn´t matter how fast it becomes, but how it becomes fast.  2015 Roadster 3.7
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723 Likes: 149
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723 Likes: 149 |
Method of comparing rear springs independent of tyre size and pressure.
I needed a method of comparing the ride height of the chassis regardless of the type of wheels and tyres fitted to the two cars being compared. This exercise was so that I could judge one set of springs against another but it could also be used for other purposes, such as the effect of a load of touring luggage etc. Getting under the car and measuring the distance between say the bottom of the chassis and the axle is not easy unless you have a pit or you can raise the car on a lift that lefts under the wheels. Even then you have to be sure all 4 wheels are on a level plane. After a bit of thought I came up with the following method.
The following measurements are from my car which is fitted with the older type 5 leaf rear springs.
Fuel about one quarter of a tank. No other load on board.
The car must be on an absolutely level surface. Before measuring I tried to bounce the car a little on its springs to get the dampers to settle. I discovered it is actually not easy to get any movement but I probably got enough to do the trick.
First I measured the rolling radius of the 195/60 R15 tyres by measuring from the hub centres to the ground. A small point made with a marking pen on the centre of the wheel nut would probably help. They averaged to 292 mm I did not worry about pressure but it was probably about 24 psi. It is not really important for the calculation I have in mind. There was actually 2 mm difference between left and right (slightly different pressure??).
The height of the lower chassis rail measured near the wheels was average 174 mm (there was 2 mm difference left and right due to the tyres, in other words the springs were amazingly equal)
By deducting the 174 from 292 we get 118 mm which is the height difference between the centre of the axle and the bottom of the chassis rail. This can then be compared to another car that has been measured using the same system.
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
|