Forums34
Topics48,362
Posts813,327
Members9,215
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,868 Likes: 138
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
|
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,868 Likes: 138 |
Leaking float? Has it soaked up some fuel so it weighs more and so sits lower in the tank?
Tim H. 1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 541
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 541 |
Mine just went down to zero. Only took 5 gallons. Just can't figure out why she's gotten less accurate since I installed the 280 3,000 miles ago. Mine is now doing the same thing after 1,000 miles, very odd.
1998 +8 SS Sport tuned exhaust
2013 M3W Stage ll motor kit Cats removed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,015 Likes: 1
Has a lot to Say!
|
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,015 Likes: 1 |
Connections are fine. I'm perplexed and disappointed. She hits 0% after only about 100-120 miles (4-4.5 gallons). No idea what's going on. After I first installed the 280mm sender 100 miles would have it reading 50%. So strange. I think we just have to accept that the design of the M3W tanks and the behavior of that sender unit conspire to make reading fuel levels somewhat challenging. The 280mm sender helps, but doesn't cure the issue. So why not just use the motorcycle approach and rely on distance covered on the trip instead? I'll happily run to 250 miles of typical driving before filling. Over my trip to and from the TOTH last weekend I filled up at approx 170 miles (having had 0% showing for a decent while) and managed to squeeze no more than 30 litres in each time, proving I 'bottled' waaay too soon, again. But they were hard miles, so maybe 200 is a sensible limit to cover all occasions.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,940 Likes: 218
Talk Morgan Guru
|
OP
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,940 Likes: 218 |
Mine just went down to zero. Only took 5 gallons. Just can't figure out why she's gotten less accurate since I installed the 280 3,000 miles ago. Mine is now doing the same thing after 1,000 miles, very odd. Ditto. The soggy/leaking float theory might explain, but if so you would be hard put to reach 100% on gauge which I still regularly get after fill up. If anyone has their boot pan removed can they check if there is room for the next size up 310mm sensor? Take measurement from sensor flange interface to bottom of tank allowing for thickness.
Richard
2018 Roadster 3.7 1966 Land Rover S2a 88 2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 1945 Guzzi Airone
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,490
Has a lot to Say!
|
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,490 |
I've contacted VDO. I'll let you all know if and when they respond.
The Original Ken 11,000 miles.
2014 BMW R9T 2005 Saabaru 2005 Saabaru
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,660 Likes: 48
Talk Morgan Addict
|
Talk Morgan Addict
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 3,660 Likes: 48 |
So why not just use the motorcycle approach and rely on distance covered on the trip instead? I'll happily run to 250 miles of typical driving before filling. Over my trip to and from the TOTH last weekend I filled up at approx 170 miles (having had 0% showing for a decent while) and managed to squeeze no more than 30 litres in each time, proving I 'bottled' waaay too soon, again. But they were hard miles, so maybe 200 is a sensible limit to cover all occasions..... +1 I start looking to fill up at around 170 miles on the trip meter and will happily run to 220 - 230 before I start to worry. A normal fill up is around 30 litres.
Red Leader
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,940 Likes: 218
Talk Morgan Guru
|
OP
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,940 Likes: 218 |
Another observation on this issue which I've noticed before but recently highlighted. After a long run yesterday I noted the fuel indication had dropped to below 25%. After an overnight rest, on start up it was indicating 41%.
I've suggested before fuel sloshing around the two tanks may explain. I also wondered if the ECU has any hand in reducing the reading during driving. Anyone else noticed this?
Richard
2018 Roadster 3.7 1966 Land Rover S2a 88 2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 1945 Guzzi Airone
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,015 Likes: 1
Has a lot to Say!
|
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,015 Likes: 1 |
Another observation on this issue which I've noticed before but recently highlighted. After a long run yesterday I noted the fuel indication had dropped to below 25%. After an overnight rest, on start up it was indicating 41%.
I've suggested before fuel sloshing around the two tanks may explain. I also wondered if the ECU has any hand in reducing the reading during driving. Anyone else noticed this? Mine does the same...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,562
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,562 |
Same. Its still highly inaccurate with the long sender , but in different ways !
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 128
L - Learner Plates On
|
L - Learner Plates On
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 128 |
While purchasing a 2014 Brooklands from Morgan West this weekend, I raised the question of the fuel with their mechanic.
He said (and this may be total fantasy) that the percentages shown on the gauge were not simply derived from the fuel sender in the tank. He argued that the output from the sender went through the ECU/computer that adjusted what is shown depending on the current engine load, rpm, etc. So, it is (in an odd way) doing a vague adjustment like some cars estimate miles to empty.
No question that he and the owner's manual say that at least, when the system reads 0/0 - there would be at least 3 gallons acting as a reserve. But still, that reading would be altered based on how you were driving.
It certainly did while we were driving and changed depending on how spirited we drove.
No clue how this really works....but, if true, would be affected by the accuracies of the inputs and any algorithm written to adjust the figures shown on the gauge.
|
|
|
|
|