Click here to return to the home page.
Classic Morgans
Who's Online Now
6 members (John Winn, DPEvans, Davetherave, TBM, BobtheTrain, Craig Jezz), 315 guests, and 84 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 85
Newest Members
Scot_SJI, Jimmers, Breen60, Davidmog, Stevecarr
9,596 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Delay to bring up oil pressure ( 2006 +4 )
by Cerberas - 31/08/26 03:11 PM
Clarkson Review of Supersport 400
by Stephen888 - 31/08/26 01:09 PM
M3W Treffen Grindelwald 2026 /2
by Laurens - 31/08/26 01:03 PM
M3W Treffen Grindelwald 2026
by Laurens - 31/08/26 01:01 PM
Hood catches rear
by AndyGoff - 31/08/26 11:34 AM
Spare Ignition Key ............
by Pittsartist - 31/08/26 10:58 AM
Sagging Hood
by linklaw - 31/08/26 10:33 AM
Latest Photos
tow bar
tow bar
by G Walker, August 24
Prescott double anniversary
Prescott double anniversary
by CooperMan, August 18
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
by RedThree, August 13
Four-seater luggage rack
Four-seater luggage rack
by Soleng, August 9
New M3W orange 2012
New M3W orange 2012
by jejemek, August 7
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,859
Posts837,478
Members9,596
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 20
New to Talk Morgan
OP Offline
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 20
Can someone clarify the positives and negatives for these two types of replacement king pins? Since stainless steel contains chromium for hardness why one or the other? Is there a substantial difference between the various stainless king pins available by the lead sellers like Mulfab, New Elms, etc. Thanks,

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,036
C
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
C
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,036

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 35
Rog Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 35
Originally Posted By ScotsGent
Since stainless steel contains chromium for hardness why one or the other?

The chromium content in a low strength soft stainless pin is there to increase the corrosion resistance, not to increase the material hardness or strength. Stainless pins are quite soft compared to the surface hardness of a hard chrome plated steel pin.


Roger
2011 Plus 4
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,358
Likes: 353
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,358
Likes: 353
My stainless pins were badly worn at 5000 miles when I got my Roadster. And with four dealer stamps.


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Originally Posted By Rog
Originally Posted By ScotsGent
Since stainless steel contains chromium for hardness why one or the other?

The chromium content in a low strength soft stainless pin is there to increase the corrosion resistance, not to increase the material hardness or strength. Stainless pins are quite soft compared to the surface hardness of a hard chrome plated steel pin.


Roger uses the term "hard chrome" and that's the salient point.
I don't know the metallurgical reasons but the point is that not all chrome plating is the same.

Decorative chrome plating is not very hard at all and can easily be scratched whereas hard chrome plating is a specialised engineering process with the specific intent to leave a very wear resistant surface.

The Chromium in Stainless Steel is in relatively small proportions and is to provide corrosion resistance not wear resistance.

However, regardless of the metallurgical reasons, I think the overwhelming conclusion on TM is that Hard Chrome Pins outlast Stainless Steel Pins by a very large order of magnitude.


Bob

2009 Black Roadster
1999 4/4 2 litre Zetec
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 5,654
Likes: 4
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 5,654
Likes: 4
Hard chrome is definitly a hard wearing engineering product. We used it in the aerospace industry to recover undersize components after salvage. The finish was labarotory tested to be as good as the original surface properties.

Last edited by deano; 08/12/17 11:14 AM.

Martin (Deano)
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,723
Likes: 2
S
SBM Offline
Talk Morgan Sage
Offline
Talk Morgan Sage
S
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 6,723
Likes: 2
If I recall, I think motorcycle front fork stanchions are hard chromed to negate excessive wear.


Steve
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 27,810
Likes: 749
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 27,810
Likes: 749
Originally Posted By Stringers Best Mate
If I recall, I think motorcycle front fork stanchions are hard chromed to negate excessive wear.


Steve, yes they are. Hard chrome is used for hard wearing surfaces. Most stainless & certainly AISI304 is relatively soft.


JohnV6
2022 CX Plus Four
2025 Renault Scenic Alpine etech "Yvette"
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Bike forks also use Titanium Nitride, golden in colour.

There are indeed better solutions these days than Hard Chrome but as we tend to use stock hydraulic rod they would be a bit more expensive.

I have often pondered the thought of using a more modern coating such as Titanium Nitride or a Carbon based coating such as Nitron MC with Button's favourite "Vesconite" bushes.

Extremely low coefficient of friction and according to all the science, self lubricating so no grease to turn into grinding paste.

But that's the theory and what I've learnt so far in my very short Morgan time is that Morgan's don't always conform to sound engineering logic.

I shall continue to dream.


Bob

2009 Black Roadster
1999 4/4 2 litre Zetec
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,943
B
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
B
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,943
I have found there are two varieties of Hard Chrome Hydraulic Rod. One is "Induction Hardened" under the chrome and the other is not. From conversations with a Machinist Morgan Friend of mine, He speculates the "Induction Hardened" rod gives a better base for the thin layer of chrome. My King Pins are of the "non hardened type" as they are from the first batch I made. At 50,000 miles I inspected them and there was some damage to the chrome. I turned them 180 degrees and reinstalled them with the original vesconite bushes. I also did not grease for 2 years and I guess 10,000 miles with out greasing. Seemed OK to Me. I now grease once a year at Spring maintenance time.

I did replace stainless KP's and Devol bushes for a friend in Texas, the pins were badly worn but Devol bushes were OK. I replaced the Devols with Vesconite.

On My +4 I used Devol Bushes and chrome KP's. I have kept this system greased regularly. Seems to be OK. Over 40,000 miles on this rig. (My estimate) One of the attributes of Devol bushes is the "Resultant Fit". The axle tube is reamed and I had it honed. I have a set of Devol bushes in My spares.

Remember I live in Seattle, Washington, USA. The closest Dealer is 1,000 miles from Me. In British Columbia, Washington and Oregon there are about 150 Morgans. Not many of these are Road Worthy nor driven very much.

The use of Vesconite was pioneered by an Australian Mining Engineer. I found a source of this Material and introduced it locally. Vesconite if a South African product used in pumps for mines and the marine industry as well as other uses as a replacement for Bronze bushes.

If I were a Brit I would use Peter Mullberry's products. I am not and find making the pins out of hydraulic rod and bushes out of Vesconite is much less expensive and has done the job very well for Me.


Button
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5