Click here to return to the home page.
Morgan Aero 8
Who's Online Now
5 members (Biggle, Chris Cosher, DickJ, Socalm3w, John V6), 275 guests, and 47 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
John V6 76
+8Rich 68
DaveW 67
Newest Members
Ulfulf, Wilfried, Classic-Line, BrunswickGreen44, Franco Morgan
9,203 Registered Users
Newest Topics
M3W - Anyone know this car?
by Biggle - 22/07/25 01:40 PM
S&S X Wedge Engine Gasket Source
by Morgan Dude - 22/07/25 02:13 AM
Supermax sprocket
by Laurens - 21/07/25 08:26 AM
Morgan 3 Wheeler song
by Dutch - 21/07/25 12:31 AM
Technical drawings, dimensions, 3D model M3W
by Oskar - 20/07/25 04:13 PM
Goggle eyed
by Roady - 19/07/25 06:16 PM
FOR SALE AERO8 series 1 WHEELS
by t50 - 19/07/25 12:07 PM
Latest Photos
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
by DaveK, July 19
Visit to the Factory- Historic Morgan Group
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,339
Posts812,959
Members9,203
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
PPP356
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 140
G
L - Learner Plates On
Offline
L - Learner Plates On
G
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 140
I had my S3, which has side pipes noise tested at Thruxton this week, they have a 90db noise limit, was very surprised to hit 86db at 4000rpm, it sounds much louder than that!


Gareth
Aero 8
R Nine T
335d
BMW Power!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 1
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By Gareth H
I had my S3, which has side pipes noise tested at Thruxton this week, they have a 90db noise limit, was very surprised to hit 86db at 4000rpm, it sounds much louder than that!


I really wouldn't read too much into that as noise testing procedures like this are hopelessly open to variance and massively unreliable. What they do allow however is for venues to disallow obviously noisy cars on track days where they would upset the neighbours - it's a neat way to show a black & white reason why a car can't run.

I did 2 track days at Goodwood the other year in the same car (Renaultsport Spider), just 2 weeks apart. Pretty much the same weather, nothing had changed yet first test measured 96dB (4,500rpm, 0.5m, 45deg angle) and the second 106dB. Given that the logarithmic scale means that +3dB is broadly twice the volume, that's one heck of an increase. Different bloke measured using the same device on the same settings (I asked for proof that they were doing it correctly). Maybe the wind was in the other direction of there were more reflections off other cars in the vicinity, but either way it's an imprecise science at best - certainly under 'field conditions'.

Years before I'd also been refused track access for a Yamaha R1 with the stock factory dustbin-sized exhaust can, which they insisted on noise testing at 3/4 max revs that day (@9,000rpm). The noise off the cam-gear was as horrific as you'd imaging and the bloke said that the 102dB it measured was too high and I was not allowed on. EU Type Approval plate on headstock read 78dB exhaust noise at 7,500rpm as homologation, which is almost silent. I complained and was asked to try a ride by reading instead, fortunately. Did a couple of laps and I think Parkie actually missed me first time round as he never heard me coming. It was quiet, of course, and I was allowed on.

It's all a conspiracy you know....

/RANT=OFF.

Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 140
G
L - Learner Plates On
Offline
L - Learner Plates On
G
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 140
Originally Posted By R1NGA
Originally Posted By Gareth H
I had my S3, which has side pipes noise tested at Thruxton this week, they have a 90db noise limit, was very surprised to hit 86db at 4000rpm, it sounds much louder than that!


I really wouldn't read too much into that as noise testing procedures like this are hopelessly open to variance and massively unreliable. What they do allow however is for venues to disallow obviously noisy cars on track days where they would upset the neighbours - it's a neat way to show a black & white reason why a car can't run.

I did 2 track days at Goodwood the other year in the same car (Renaultsport Spider), just 2 weeks apart. Pretty much the same weather, nothing had changed yet first test measured 96dB (4,500rpm, 0.5m, 45deg angle) and the second 106dB. Given that the logarithmic scale means that +3dB is broadly twice the volume, that's one heck of an increase. Different bloke measured using the same device on the same settings (I asked for proof that they were doing it correctly). Maybe the wind was in the other direction of there were more reflections off other cars in the vicinity, but either way it's an imprecise science at best - certainly under 'field conditions'.

Years before I'd also been refused track access for a Yamaha R1 with the stock factory dustbin-sized exhaust can, which they insisted on noise testing at 3/4 max revs that day (@9,000rpm). The noise off the cam-gear was as horrific as you'd imaging and the bloke said that the 102dB it measured was too high and I was not allowed on. EU Type Approval plate on headstock read 78dB exhaust noise at 7,500rpm as homologation, which is almost silent. I complained and was asked to try a ride by reading instead, fortunately. Did a couple of laps and I think Parkie actually missed me first time round as he never heard me coming. It was quiet, of course, and I was allowed on.

It's all a conspiracy you know....

/RANT=OFF.

I've had a bit to do with noise testing commercial aircon, and you're right it always seems to be more of an art than a science, but 10db difference is huge, I wonder how often the circuits calibrate their measuring equipment?


Gareth
Aero 8
R Nine T
335d
BMW Power!
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,415
Likes: 177
Salty Sea Dog
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Salty Sea Dog
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,415
Likes: 177
Annually at minimum to comply with MSA from what I remember, as a former trainee Environmental Scrutineer.

From the same role I'm also aware of how difficult it can be to get an accurate reading. However, from MSA perspective it is overall noise, not just exhaust. The instructions are to not carry out noise tests in a confined area.

(It's a few years since I did any of this so rules may have altered and my memory is not quite what it was oldgit grin2 )


Graham (G4FUJ)

Sold L44FOR 4/4 Giallo Fly
'09 Gen2 MINI Cooper ragtop
'90 LR 90 SW
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 861
D
Talk Morgan Regular
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
D
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 861
Another update from the importer:
Morgan refused to change the CoC
They are now working with an exhaust specialist to build a custom exhaust that will record 86dB in accordance with the Swiss measuring regulations.

Car due back 19th October


2010 Aero Supersport | 2017 VW Multivan | 1996 BMW M3 Evo
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,919
Likes: 216
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,919
Likes: 216
Originally Posted By Gareth H

I've had a bit to do with noise testing commercial aircon, and you're right it always seems to be more of an art than a science, but 10db difference is huge, I wonder how often the circuits calibrate their measuring equipment?




Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 32
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 32
I love the "power gain factor" love


2010 Violet Aero Supersports | 2012 Green Vantage S Roadster
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 91
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 91
Double of loudness perception is almost a factor of 6dB.
http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-levelchange.htm

Ah I see, Sengpiel uses the same sheet you have posted, Richard, further down on his page.

Last edited by Heinz; 07/10/18 12:15 PM.

'14 4/4 graphite grey
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 861
D
Talk Morgan Regular
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
D
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 861
Meanwhile I got an email from "my" exhaust man who is scratching his head on how it would be possible to get the sidepipes down to 86dB.

It is now just a waiting game


2010 Aero Supersport | 2017 VW Multivan | 1996 BMW M3 Evo
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 861
D
Talk Morgan Regular
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
D
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 861
My exhaust man was right - not a chance in hell of hitting 86dB - but it is now down to 91dB - which is withing 3% or 5dB of the CoC limit.

Which means the car failed.

Failed? Yes - failed.
But it passed the noise test? Yes - but it failed to have any paperwork for the exhaust

So what this means is the car will tomorrow get booked in at FAKT to have the exhaust homologated - which is good news for me, but less good news for any other sidepipe equipped Supersport in Switzerland.

My understanding is that once the homologation has been completed and the paperwork submitted to the STVA only those cars equipped with this particular side exhaust will pass the MFK.

I will get all this clarified - and also provide details of the exhaust supplier - in due course, and once the car is sat back on my drive!


2010 Aero Supersport | 2017 VW Multivan | 1996 BMW M3 Evo
Page 5 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5