9 members (DJC, Bunny, Adam12, nick w, DaveW, High Hamster, BobtheTrain, mickyb, Hamwich),
234
guests, and
39
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glitch
by BobtheTrain - 18/07/25 05:47 PM
|
|
|
Forums34
Topics48,328
Posts812,847
Members9,202
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,325 Likes: 11
Has a lot to Say!
|
OP
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,325 Likes: 11 |
Around our way, the average speed on a National Speed Limit road (60mph) is 40 - 45, everywhere, and frankly why not? They are mostly retired people with plenty of time and not always with a great deal of confidence. aren't these the drivers & journeys that will soon be in a self-driving car? Will
Formerly Aero S5 #80 Currently 911 (992) Targa in python green
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,877 Likes: 20
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,877 Likes: 20 |
I notice a sadly common phenomena where the outside lane on two or three lane carriageways becomes clogged by ridiculously close nose to tail traffic. Brake lights flash on and off like indicators. Yes. Last month I was driving down the M5 and I saw something I have never seen before. The outside lane was full of cars nose to tail as far as I could see and there wasnt a single vehicle, not even one, in sight in the inside two lanes. Maybe our british queuing instinct had triumphed - we feared than undertaking would be seen as queue jumping maybe. Here in North America, we have solved the problem of too slow driving with state and Federal laws. It's legal on divided highways to pass in the right lanes if the left lanes are blocked. Similarly, on 2 lane roads, state laws require you to pull over at the first opportunity and let traffic pass you if more than 3 or 4 vehicles are behind. It seems to work well, with minimum congestion on the open road. Why these policies haven't been implemented in UK is beyond me. Its odd really. We arent allowed to undertake or to hog the middle or outside lanes. But there are no traffic police to enforce these regulations. Why then do we mostly not undertake but we do lane hog? The real issue is that our roads are far too congested. Blame immigration and JIT manufacture, for its not like the railways are under utilised. No. The big change since the 60s when we moved from reasonably empty roads to full ones has been that all strata of society and both sexes now have cars. In my youth, blue collar factory workers didnt have cars and whats more mostly lived within walking distance of their place of work. Few women had driving licences and most stayed at home anyway. My mother had three brothers, all skilled labour. None of them had a car in their family. All their multiple offspring and grandchildren have cars now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 456
Learner Plates Off!
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 456 |
Surely if factory workers are to blame, they'd be in the factories and not clogging the roads all day and night?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,107 Likes: 56
Black Rat Charter Member
|
Black Rat Charter Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,107 Likes: 56 |
On dual carriageways and motorways you can undertake slower vehicles. "stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you may pass on the left" from the Highway code. I was also told by a senior traffic officer that if there is not a queue and you travel for x amount of distance (I think it was a mile) then you may undertake by giving the driver ahead notice by indicating, flashing and sounding your horn as you go past on the nearside. This as you can imagine doesn't tend to go down well in general with the driver ahead The general standard of driving in the UK especially on national speed limit roads is pretty poor. Seems even worse the more lanes there are. When did the inside lane become a lorry only lane on motorways? Seems that way to me anyway. Not true, you can only undertake in slowly moving congested traffic. Undertaking in a left lane and then pulling into a right lane is not allowed. Careless Driving. Thanks for the clarification Keith, do you know at what point i.e. distance, you are allowed to pull back into the outside lane or was this traffic officer talking bs? I can't ask him as he passed away the other year. It was told on a driving course by him. Basically he was talking BS. There is no fixed distance when you can move into right lane.
Keith 2013 narrow bodied + 4 Ruby.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,959 Likes: 15
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
|
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,959 Likes: 15 |
On dual carriageways and motorways you can undertake slower vehicles. "stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you may pass on the left" from the Highway code. I was also told by a senior traffic officer that if there is not a queue and you travel for x amount of distance (I think it was a mile) then you may undertake by giving the driver ahead notice by indicating, flashing and sounding your horn as you go past on the nearside. This as you can imagine doesn't tend to go down well in general with the driver ahead The general standard of driving in the UK especially on national speed limit roads is pretty poor. Seems even worse the more lanes there are. When did the inside lane become a lorry only lane on motorways? Seems that way to me anyway. Not true, you can only undertake in slowly moving congested traffic. Undertaking in a left lane and then pulling into a right lane is not allowed. Careless Driving. Thanks for the clarification Keith, do you know at what point i.e. distance, you are allowed to pull back into the outside lane or was this traffic officer talking bs? I can't ask him as he passed away the other year. It was told on a driving course by him. Basically he was talking BS. There is no fixed distance when you can move into right lane. Thats Laindon traffic officers (Sergeant) for you 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,013 Likes: 32
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 5,013 Likes: 32 |
I regularly see drivers pootling along at 30mph in a 60mph limit with half a mile of traffic behind them. I was stuck behind one yesterday in fact.
Isn't that also the fault of the person behind the 30mph driver? Why didn't they overtake? Impossible to overtake safely - so no, the following drivers were not at 'fault'. If an inconsiderate driver is holding up half a mile of traffic, he/she should pull over.
+8 4.8
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,853 Likes: 137
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
|
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,853 Likes: 137 |
Impossible to overtake safely - so no, the following drivers were not at 'fault'. If an inconsiderate driver is holding up half a mile of traffic, he/she should pull over. I don't disagree that slow drivers should pull over when there is an opportunity to do so to let traffic past. I would contend that a road in which it is impossible to overtake safely anywhere is probably not capable of supporting traffic moving at 50-60mph. I suspect what might have been actually happening here was an example of what is to my mind the worst form of driving, where someone drives very slowly though bendy bits, but then speeds up when the road straightens out, preventing people from overtaking. I have no problem whatsoever with people driving slowly, there may be a million reasons why it's the right speed for them, but this 25mph through the bends/50mph on the straights nonsense is extremely frustrating.
Tim H. 1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 996 Likes: 23
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 996 Likes: 23 |
There's a specific road near me that is often dogged by slow drivers.
The road does have opportunities for overtaking but when the first car is slow, and the second car has no intention of overtaking and drives closely behind the first, the result is a long queue of frustrated drivers.
I like to think I'm a considerate and patient driver but following such drivers at 35/40 mph for miles would tempt anyone into taking risks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794 Likes: 14
Formerly known as Aldermog Member of the Inner Circle
|
Formerly known as Aldermog Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794 Likes: 14 |
Impossible to overtake safely - so no, the following drivers were not at 'fault'. If an inconsiderate driver is holding up half a mile of traffic, he/she should pull over. I don't disagree that slow drivers should pull over when there is an opportunity to do so to let traffic past. I would contend that a road in which it is impossible to overtake safely anywhere is probably not capable of supporting traffic moving at 50-60mph. I suspect what might have been actually happening here was an example of what is to my mind the worst form of driving, where someone drives very slowly though bendy bits, but then speeds up when the road straightens out, preventing people from overtaking. I have no problem whatsoever with people driving slowly, there may be a million reasons why it's the right speed for them, but this 25mph through the bends/50mph on the straights nonsense is extremely frustrating. One reason why the Plus 8 is so rewarding, it is easy to overtake the typical modern driver who proceeds at 45mph on a 50 mph limit that was, until last year, a "national limit" road. The only problem with "ballistic" overtaking, motorcycle style, is that it frightens the driver of the car being overtaken as it seems these people don't use their mirrors, so have no idea that I'm there. I now mostly drive with headlights on and flash main beam before overtaking....
Peter, 66, 2016 Porsche Boxster S No longer driving Tarka, the 2014 Plus 8...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,255 Likes: 2
Talk Morgan Expert
|
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,255 Likes: 2 |
The study finds that older drivers, who represent 15 percent of all licensed drivers, cause 7 percent of all two-car accidents (both fatal and nonfatal).Jul 6, 2007
There must be some falling off in ability for some people over 60 but this does not necessarily make them unfit to drive does it?
|
|
|
|
|