Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online Now
5 members (Graham, G4FUJ, Chiltern MOG, RichardV6, Paul F, Draggin), 315 guests, and 114 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 78
Newest Members
Scot_SJI, Jimmers, Breen60, Davidmog, Stevecarr
9,596 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Henry Catchpole on the SS 400 vid
by Luddite - 04/09/26 02:24 PM
Cars and boats vid
by Luddite - 04/09/26 09:04 AM
Boats alongsidish last night
by +8Rich - 03/09/26 11:57 PM
Steering bearings
by Ricosan - 03/09/26 06:30 PM
Tyres for 1990 +8
by CJB - 03/09/26 11:16 AM
2018 Sigma 4/4 ride height
by Neville1 - 02/09/26 09:10 PM
CX moaners
by Malachy - 02/09/26 01:20 PM
Latest Photos
Wales
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
tow bar
tow bar
by G Walker, August 24
Prescott double anniversary
Prescott double anniversary
by CooperMan, August 18
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
by RedThree, August 13
Four-seater luggage rack
Four-seater luggage rack
by Soleng, August 9
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,872
Posts837,704
Members9,596
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
Rudolf
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 11 12
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
OP Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
Absolute speculation but a little research on the possible engine and drive train for an imagined CX PlusFour comes up with the B48 BMW engine used in the BMW 2 Series Coupe 230i. It is available with a 6-speed Getrag manual or an 8-speed ZF automatic.

The B48 used is a 2.0 L I4 turbo with 185 kW (248 hp) at 5,200 rpm and torque of 350 N⋅m (258 lb⋅ft) at 1,450–4,800 rpm.

CO2 emissions are 135 g/km, a vast improvement over the current Plus 4 and could even be less for the Morgan which would be lighter than the BMW.

Perhaps a more likely alternative would be the engine used in the 220i: a 135 kW (181 hp) version that develops more than adequate torque for a Plus 4 CX platform alternative: 290 N⋅m (214 lb⋅ft) at 1,250–4,500 rpm.

The way that tax is being levied on the basis of CO2 emmisions this might bring the on-road cost of a possible CX PlusFour to the same or less that a GDI Plus 4 in the same way that it has made the on-road cost of a PlusSix in some countries less than the cost of a conventionally aspirated V6 Roadster.

I will be very curious to see what, if anything, Morgan have in the pipeline. I feel that there must be both a 4 and a 3 cylinder version under consideration.

The BMW 218i produces 100 kW (134 hp) at 4,500–6,000 rpm and 220 N⋅m (162 lb⋅ft) at 1,250 rpm. CO2 emmisions are a mere 133 gm/km in the BMW and could well be less in a lighter Morgan. When it comes to performance in the real world torque is what it is all about and this would give brilliant performance for an entry point CX Morgan. A PlusThree?


Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 37,437
Likes: 983
Tricky Dicky
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Tricky Dicky
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 37,437
Likes: 983
It may not be a Bavarian power unit they chose to use, Ford has a lot more history with Morgan cars, just saying.
I do appreciate the commonality of drive train etc etc..

I'd like to see the German flat six in it and that would sound nice too. Just a different sort of Plus Six that would appeal to the Hipsters.


2009 4/4 Sport Henrietta
1999 Indigo Blue +8
2009 4/4 Sport Green prev
1993 Con Green +8 prev





Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,366
Likes: 354
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,366
Likes: 354
I don't see another Ford engine...….Ford were apparently hard work on the 3.7 with what MMC got and the price.....which is why it took a long time to resolve the deal.


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 990
Talk Morgan Regular
Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 990
I'd imagine the CX chassis would be an easy installation for another BMW family engine - I'd wager there is a CX chassis car already being tested with a smaller BMW unit as per Peters suggestions.


2015 Morgan 4/4 (Wolf fettled) previously 2014 M3W
MINI Cooper S and numerous BMC/BL relics.

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 5,587
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 5,587
Originally Posted by andymot
I'd imagine the CX chassis would be an easy installation for another BMW family engine - I'd wager there is a CX chassis car already being tested with a smaller BMW unit as per Peters suggestions.



All very interesting stuff and very likely to happen , I hope there aren't complaints about the cars being too ' perfect '.


Geneva 2016 plus 8' The Green Godess' 4 side exits .


Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 40
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 40
The Ford 1.0 ecoboost is a great engine, we had a fiesta Zetec S with 125 bhp, I think it can be easily tuned to around 180 bhp or more. It also sounds fantastic for a small engine!. Have a look on YouTube at the single seater Ford at the Nurburgring. It's disappointing if Ford is being a little awkward as I think it would be a great engine for a CX based 4/4 or plus 4.
https://youtu.be/AM5HiDq2Unc


Gordon Duguid
2014 Duratec engine plus 4, Montreal blue.
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 11,533
Likes: 318
Smile, it confuses them
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Smile, it confuses them
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 11,533
Likes: 318

I would imagine the commonality of the BMW parts make many of the mount points interchangeable which would lead to a BMW 3/4/6 and gearbox combination. I wonder if that would also lead to a manual gearbox with the 3/4 pots?


Everyone loves a Morgan. Even me, unless it's broken again.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9,545
Likes: 132
S
Needs to Get Out More!
Offline
Needs to Get Out More!
S
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9,545
Likes: 132
I would tend to go with BMW options.
Commonality of parts re installation for one.
Also the new owners are likely to have a different attitude to change than the previous family based group.
Hark back to the John Harvey-Jones era......a reluctance to make significant changes at that time but some crept in later.
There is also speculation on a factory revamp. This could add to a lot more changes to manufacturing/assembly processes.
The attraction of a Mustang engine and the Cosworth variants gave an opportunity in marketing a sporty image but not without issues re drive ability ( rev hang and power and range).
I also wonder at the ability of the chassis to carry Hybrid/ EV options too.


Plus Four MY23 Furka Rouge
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
OP Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
Originally Posted by sospan
I also wonder at the ability of the chassis to carry Hybrid/ EV options too.

If I understood from a few things that were said at the time of the CX platform launch Hybrid/EV was a definite part of the future project for the platform.


Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 399
Likes: 15
J
JMD Offline
Learner Plates Off!
Offline
Learner Plates Off!
J
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 399
Likes: 15
I suspect the electronics and bus/network architecture might be a key driver for a single engine supplier.

Page 1 of 12 1 2 3 11 12

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5