Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online Now
1 members (david nathan), 285 guests, and 41 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 65
Adam12 62
John V6 59
Newest Members
Chris Ontario, NickMog, YellowM, Dufty, Anted4
9,215 Registered Users
Newest Topics
New
by Rex_tulips - 30/07/25 07:59 PM
For saleWood rim moto-lita
by hugo - 30/07/25 04:28 PM
For Sale 2015 M3W - £23,000
by MOG42 - 29/07/25 06:28 PM
AC Cobra Rep. Vs Plus 8
by Richardllll - 29/07/25 04:40 PM
Me Again
by Whizjet - 29/07/25 03:13 PM
Tyre dates on Yokohama tyres
by SteveMerch - 29/07/25 12:39 PM
Aero 8 Maintenance
by mph - 29/07/25 09:24 AM
Latest Photos
Moto-lita for sale
Moto-lita for sale
by hugo, July 30
2015 M3W for sale
2015 M3W for sale
by MOG42, July 29
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,365
Posts813,354
Members9,215
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794
Likes: 14
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by Gambalunga
Absolute speculation but a little research on the possible engine and drive train for an imagined CX PlusFour comes up with the B48 BMW engine used in the BMW 2 Series Coupe 230i. It is available with a 6-speed Getrag manual or an 8-speed ZF automatic.

The B48 used is a 2.0 L I4 turbo with 185 kW (248 hp) at 5,200 rpm and torque of 350 N⋅m (258 lb⋅ft) at 1,450–4,800 rpm.

CO2 emissions are 135 g/km, a vast improvement over the current Plus 4 and could even be less for the Morgan which would be lighter than the BMW.

Perhaps a more likely alternative would be the engine used in the 220i: a 135 kW (181 hp) version that develops more than adequate torque for a Plus 4 CX platform alternative: 290 N⋅m (214 lb⋅ft) at 1,250–4,500 rpm.

The way that tax is being levied on the basis of CO2 emmisions this might bring the on-road cost of a possible CX PlusFour to the same or less that a GDI Plus 4 in the same way that it has made the on-road cost of a PlusSix in some countries less than the cost of a conventionally aspirated V6 Roadster.

I will be very curious to see what, if anything, Morgan have in the pipeline. I feel that there must be both a 4 and a 3 cylinder version under consideration.

The BMW 218i produces 100 kW (134 hp) at 4,500–6,000 rpm and 220 N⋅m (162 lb⋅ft) at 1,250 rpm. CO2 emmisions are a mere 133 gm/km in the BMW and could well be less in a lighter Morgan. When it comes to performance in the real world torque is what it is all about and this would give brilliant performance for an entry point CX Morgan. A PlusThree?



My two pennyworth....

All CX cars will have BMW power plants. I believe the CX chassis was developed specifically to take BMW power units.

I agree, the next car will most probably have the B48 motor and a manual box. It could be a stunning vehicle.

I suspect there will be smaller engined cars, based on the 3 Cylinder B38, possibly one with a hybrid package.

I look forward to a small, light car on the CX chassis.


Peter,
66, 2016 Porsche Boxster S
No longer driving Tarka, the 2014 Plus 8...

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 149
Member of the Inner Circle
OP Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 149
I'm not going to bet against you Peter smile


Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 697
Likes: 7
Talk Morgan Regular
Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 697
Likes: 7
[align:right][/align] Whilst the new cars are likely to be improved in almost all measurable way I think there will be 2 big issues:

The current cars have an old chassis and hence an old feel which is an attraction in many ways. Most of our everyday cars are faster, better handling, more economical than Morgan’s but they are less special to drive. The current feel is unique I suspect the new one will be much better but less special.

In addition the new cars will be far more complex which is not an issue for the first few years but will it be possible to keep a new one running easily in 15 years? Will the current cars be the last car which could be considered a self maintainable classic. I find I like driving my plus4 more than I did when I first bought it. How many other cars are like that.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 149
Member of the Inner Circle
OP Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 149
When it comes to management of fuel injection and ignition I think there will always be the possibility of keeping a car or bike on the road because, if a replacement OEM ECU is not available, it will always be possible to fit an alternative. The problem becomes much more complex when you factor in ABS and traction control, specific electronic instruments etc. When some of these parts are no longer available the car becomes a museum piece. It is in the nature of limited production cars that you can't just go to your nearest breaker yard and pick up a second hand part.

So I agree, it will be very difficult for modern cars and bikes to be still usable as a classic vehicle in 30 years time. By then I will be 103 so probably won't be all that worried about it.


Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 218
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 218
Just idle thoughts Peter, but if the firmware that ECU/BCU's use is saved, which costs virtually nothing, then won't there be a market for specialist companies to offer re-engineered components using future hardware. Even reverse engineering may be possible by then. Either way this would future proof virtually any potential classic car of small or large production.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 242
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 242
Originally Posted by Peter J

My two pennyworth....

All CX cars will have BMW power plants. I believe the CX chassis was developed specifically to take BMW power units.

I agree, the next car will most probably have the B48 motor and a manual box. It could be a stunning vehicle.

I suspect there will be smaller engined cars, based on the 3 Cylinder B38, possibly one with a hybrid package.

I look forward to a small, light car on the CX chassis.


Does anyone know how much the PlusSix weighs ?


Jon M
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 218
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,943
Likes: 218
Originally Posted by CooperMan

Does anyone know how much the PlusSix weighs ?


Kerb weight 1075 Kg.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794
Likes: 14
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by CooperMan
Originally Posted by Peter J

My two pennyworth....

All CX cars will have BMW power plants. I believe the CX chassis was developed specifically to take BMW power units.

I agree, the next car will most probably have the B48 motor and a manual box. It could be a stunning vehicle.

I suspect there will be smaller engined cars, based on the 3 Cylinder B38, possibly one with a hybrid package.

I look forward to a small, light car on the CX chassis.


Does anyone know how much the PlusSix weighs ?




Not a lot.... various figures quoted, but it seems that they are less than 1000kg.
The Aero Chassis Plus 8 was, when I had it weighed, 1240kg with fuel, oil and "car junk" on board.


Peter,
66, 2016 Porsche Boxster S
No longer driving Tarka, the 2014 Plus 8...

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 11,221
Likes: 159
Smile, it confuses them
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Smile, it confuses them
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 11,221
Likes: 159
I agree with the obsolescence issue but wonder if it does really need to be this way. I am going to say that the motor industry is more than happy to ensure that the tin dies so they can sell more. Not deliberate or evil but not really interested in long term eco-liability. They use all the resources and energy to build something then if true eco-honesty was in your heart then you would architect it to be around longer.

I can put a modern SSD disc in a 15 year old computer in 3 minutes. Given the computer industries rate of advancement is around 5 times the car industries (I am making that up a bit) this is quite significant.

I am going to guess a few of us remember the BBC B, Commodore 64 and ZX Spectrum as the first massive wave of home computers. Well they were a while back now but the good thing is Moores Law allows modern hardware and computing to emulate them easily. You can go on line and download a MAME (https://stardot.org.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=10942) which runs as a program in your PC. It is a bit like opening word as an application. Once you are in it you are using a BBC B to all intents. You can now load Galaxians and have fun at 640x256 resolution like you did before you had chin hair.

Apply this to a car. It cannot be that hard. It just requires the motivation and market. You have a decently powered computer and hardened O/S and you run a MAME emulator of the OEM computers in a car. There has to be a market for this in the future. The code is available from the OEM vendors. All they would need to do is say "I am not going to make it anymore and so I make it royalty free and publish it here" It removes legal issues. It permits someone to build a MAME using the original parameters which is vital for the ABS/ESD etc funcitons of the other components.

How else is MadMax going to happen in the future.


Everyone loves a Morgan. Even me, unless it's broken again.
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 194
L
Part of the Furniture
Offline
Part of the Furniture
L
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 194
Hawki, from my forum I.D. you may guess that I think similarly to you in terms of technological advance relative to adding complexity to management of vehicular systems..?

I ever prioritised self reliance when it came to the ability to maintain and repair my recreational vehicle, in fact all my vehicles right up till the time when digitisation made inroads in a way that restricted access to aspects of it`s fuelling system`s operation and control, and that was many years ago... I stuck with fuel injection right up to K Jetronic, but after that threw the towel in and re-set my priorities for a fun car for the reasons similar to those you suggest. The idea of breaking down or failing to start as the result of who knows what, certainly held no appeal.

I remember perhaps in the 70`s when what were up till then simple fixings on engines etc. began to appear requiring "special" tools to fit them. These fixings created in the manufacturers hope that it would restrict the DIY brigade from performing their own maintenance. I suspect when EFI initially appeared, the manufacturers could not believe their luck in the increased ability it provided to restrict DIY access..

Admittedly gone are the days when the only way to interrogate a digital system was through a main dealer only held software/hardware system. Things moved on a tad with OBDII connectivity and hand held scanners becoming available to the general DIY brigade allowing a means of interrogating the software for fault codes generated as the result of hardware issues. In time Digital systems moved on to then more up to date kit whereby fault codes can be reset or values on some hardware changed through DIY software interfaces and even with the push of a button jump over to a different software programme for performance as opposed to economy or whatever other priorities may be desired...? Yup all very clever indeed... and extremely efficient, until it fails to start, or run reasonably as the result of perhaps just one corroded connection in a wiring harness made up of just how many connections..????

Fault codes are wonderful and can point you in the approximate direction, but they can cause confusion too, even for a logical thinker with a sound mechanical grounding on the basics of an internal combustion engine and much else mechanical that comes together to create a vehicle.... A store full of expensive spares that can be swapped about has oft times been used to determine the source of a fault in the real world of repairing machinery today.

Then of course we come up against obsolescence, and in systems digital... that can come about much more rapidly than ever before, but with a bit of luck you might be able to rip out the old system perhaps even using some of the harness to connect up a new series of sensors to the latest type of ECU...Assuming the machine in question is worth the expense or bother...?

Given any of the above is it any wonder that few folk are hands on with their Morgans as the average Morganeer of the past, sure there will always be those who will enjoy messing with the digital variables and modern mechanicals... even the odd Baby Boomer, but they will become fewer by the day.... call it a mix of technological evolution and expected human lifespan..(-:

Putting all the technological advance to one side it does seem that although a CX Morgan is so very different to a TRAD, it is still a Morgan, perhaps just as a M3W is still a TRIKE, and also very different from the original machine in terms of the technology involved..?

If you read my earlier ramble on this thread, I suspect my conclusion was that a CX Morgan is a wonderful machine and as different to it`s sports car counterparts today as my carb fed +8 Morgan was when it was new in the mid 80`s... Thus that essence which is that a Morgan may still be so very different, seems to still exist in spades...? Just that the number of dirty finger-nailed spanner wielding Morganeers will have all but died out.

Jeez I suspect it may be possible for a "mechanic" to serve an apprenticeship never having seen an engine taken apart and repaired other than in Technical college...? Sealed for life everything equates to unit replacement to the extent that "technicians" replace ever larger units with little understanding of the operation of the units internals, be that circuit boards, or gear boxes... it is a whole brave new world out there...?

As Gambalunga (Peter) typed, gone are the days of those like me were crawling under old cars in the oil polluted mud of scrap yards stripping parts off wrecked cars to keep our old cars on the road, though I do think that there will be a variation of that for digital kit of all types on fleabay etc.etc.

Long term, I think the internal combustion engine has had it`s day, and IF the future is electric, then hopefully the perceptional difference in whatever Morgan exists, will still seem RAW and involving compared to whatever other sports cars might be available at that time...?

ME..? I have no desire for the "sophistication" of a digitally reliant Morgan or the stiffer CX chassis configuration with it`s more compliant suspension and the large number of horses crammed under it`s bonnet, the whole Vintage aspect of what a TRAD Morgan WAS is that which I bought into and enjoyed over a number of years, touring around Southern Europe and here at home. With some selected spares and tools on board I was pretty confident that I would have a good chance of repairing any of the well known "foibles" a Morgan might present.... With flexing chassis, greasing suspension and occasionally loosening nuts and bolts my Morgan`s vintage aspects required a measure of pilot involvement that might be expected of a Vintage car, but it`s Engine, drive train, and electrics and fortunately it`s brakes were far from Vintage.... Though compared to the CX,... well perhaps they are...Evolution is a very important aspect of survival is it not..?

TODAY`s young Morgan buyer may well think that a CX is VERY old school in a similar way as did I some years back when I was younger and thought a Morgan would suit my ideals perfectly at the time..

Just thinking in type.... oldgit hide

Page 5 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 12

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5