Click here to return to the home page.
Image of a road.
Who's Online Now
1 members (+8Rich), 255 guests, and 23 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 94
Luddite 54
Newest Members
phenompilot52, Orjan, John Courtney, vince Indiana US, Garage Andreas
9,635 Registered Users
Newest Topics
small hose from air cleaner - 1989
by Carbuilder - 12/09/26 04:50 PM
New member in NYC
by SEG - 12/09/26 04:13 PM
Door card removal ?
by Pittsartist - 12/09/26 11:35 AM
New to me plus 4
by SailingTom2 - 12/09/26 06:24 AM
Hot Bonnet
by Carbuilder - 11/09/26 11:21 PM
morgan supersport 357 miles
by Nick_H - 09/09/26 09:13 PM
M3W Treffen 2027
by Laurens - 09/09/26 08:12 PM
Latest Photos
New to me 95 plus 4 daily driver
New to me 95 plus 4 daily driver
by SailingTom2, September 12
1989 Morgan Plus 4 in Ontario, Canada
1989 Morgan Plus 4 in Ontario, Canada
by Carbuilder, September 5
First anniversary of Plus 4
First anniversary of Plus 4
by Strathaven, September 5
Wales
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
Engine/Gearbox Separator CX Models
Engine/Gearbox Separator CX Models
by number thirteen, August 30
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,904
Posts838,083
Members9,635
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
dogmanjack, Frabro
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 7
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by Gambalunga
Grease nipples on the track rod ends?


Yes Peter

The early cars all had track rod ends with grease nipples. Not sure when they changed to the newer nipple-less units (and as with all changes at MMC it would have been a very blurred time line) but I guessing the late 70s (unless anyone here knows differently?)


Andy G
1999 +8 , Indigo Blue.
Ex-John McKecknie/Mike Duncan 1955 +4 racer.
MOG 615 #616874 12/02/20 12:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,182
Likes: 2
Ray Offline
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,182
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by MOG 615
Originally Posted by Gambalunga
Grease nipples on the track rod ends?


Yes Peter

The early cars all had track rod ends with grease nipples. Not sure when they changed to the newer nipple-less units (and as with all changes at MMC it would have been a very blurred time line) but I guessing the late 70s (unless anyone here knows differently?)
. They may have gone with the Change to rack and pinion.

Last edited by Ray; 12/02/20 12:40 PM.

.+8 Now gone for a 1800 4/4. Duratec in bright yellow.
IvorMog #616881 12/02/20 01:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 143
A
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
A
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 143
Originally Posted by IvorMog
Question

Does the MOT require that boots are fitted?

My thinking is that if no boot is fitted the examiner can actually see the condition of the rod end so provided the owner keeps them in good condition they should be ok.

Obviously on the average family car where they never get looked at the boot serves a useful purpose but I check that sort of thing regularly and I would prefer to see the joint.

Clearly if a boot is fitted it needs to be in good condition as the examiner cannot see the actual joint but otherwise, is it an MOT fail not to have boots?



Ivor Mog

Check the MoT Testers Manual:

Split or missing boots are an MOT fail - the specific wording for the fail is "a ball joint dust cover missing, insecure or excessively damaged or deteriorated to the extent that it would no longer prevent the ingress of dirt."

Also road dirt and grease makes a very effective abrasive compound!!!!

Arwyn

Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Arwyn Williams
Originally Posted by IvorMog
Question

Does the MOT require that boots are fitted?

My thinking is that if no boot is fitted the examiner can actually see the condition of the rod end so provided the owner keeps them in good condition they should be ok.

Obviously on the average family car where they never get looked at the boot serves a useful purpose but I check that sort of thing regularly and I would prefer to see the joint.

Clearly if a boot is fitted it needs to be in good condition as the examiner cannot see the actual joint but otherwise, is it an MOT fail not to have boots?



Ivor Mog

Check the MoT Testers Manual:

Split or missing boots are an MOT fail - the specific wording for the fail is "a ball joint dust cover missing, insecure or excessively damaged or deteriorated to the extent that it would no longer prevent the ingress of dirt."

Also road dirt and grease makes a very effective abrasive compound!!!!

Arwyn


That's what I like, unequivocal answers. Thanks Arwyn.


Bob

2009 Black Roadster
1999 4/4 2 litre Zetec
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9,554
Likes: 134
S
Needs to Get Out More!
Offline
Needs to Get Out More!
S
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 9,554
Likes: 134
My 1993 car had a steering box so had grease nipples on all 4 joints of the steering rods. They had rubber boots. The MOT needed these to be sound but I spotted one had a split. I bought replacements off ebay for a low cost. The joints themselves were good with no wear signs. Not a difficult job to replace them but greasy! The seller on ebay offered various sizes so measurements of the old ones were matched.
I prefer the greasing by the stub axle points as you see what is going on and can spit potential problems at regular intervals.


Plus Four MY23 Furka Rouge
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,606
Likes: 617
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,606
Likes: 617
As Sospan says.... It's easy to measure the two diameters and get replacement boots off ebay for peanuts.... Did that with mine... Mine ('75) has grease nipples and the previous owner's enthusiasm with the grease gun had kept the ball joints in good condition in spite of the torn boots.

K

Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 4
I think I asked this some time ago but never really felt conclusive.

What is the best tool for separating the ball joint from the track rod end?

My method requires a lot of hammering which I don't really like.


Bob

2009 Black Roadster
1999 4/4 2 litre Zetec
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,606
Likes: 617
Charter Member
Offline
Charter Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,606
Likes: 617
I used one of these..... Just reading the box I was glad I bought it!! :-)

[Linked Image]


Can't beat a quirky translation to brighten your day


K

Image #616949 12/02/20 07:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 183
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 183
Originally Posted by Image
I used one of these..... Just reading the box I was glad I bought it!! :-)

[Linked Image]


Can't beat a quirky translation to brighten your day


K


They used one of those when I had a vasectomy on the NHS, mind you it was in Blackpool many years ago!!!!


Bruce
1964 4/4 Series V Comp (Megan)
1994 +8 (Maurice) tis no more
2013 M3W (Olga)
britmog #616967 12/02/20 08:27 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 1
R
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
R
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by britmog
Originally Posted by Image
I used one of these..... Just reading the box I was glad I bought it!! :-)

[Linked Image]


Can't beat a quirky translation to brighten your day


K


They used one of those when I had a vasectomy on the NHS, mind you it was in Blackpool many years ago!!!!

I have heard of breaking a ball joint but that is ridiculous!


John
1992 plus4 connaught green
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5