Click here to return to the home page.
Classic Morgans
Who's Online Now
6 members (CLPlusFour, Oskar, MJF, +8Rich, John Winn, IcePack), 259 guests, and 29 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
John V6 80
+8Rich 70
DaveW 67
Luddite 57
Newest Members
Ulfulf, Wilfried, Classic-Line, BrunswickGreen44, Franco Morgan
9,203 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Technical drawings, dimensions, 3D model M3W
by Oskar - 20/07/25 04:13 PM
Goggle eyed
by Roady - 19/07/25 06:16 PM
FOR SALE AERO8 series 1 WHEELS
by t50 - 19/07/25 12:07 PM
Lions Tour
by OZ 4/4 - 19/07/25 11:55 AM
Morgan rebuild on Facebook
by TBM - 19/07/25 10:50 AM
Ride Comfort & Tyre Age – Plus 4 Duratec
by Nick B - 19/07/25 10:22 AM
Super3 Accessory Rails for Side Blades
by BillHart - 18/07/25 11:59 PM
Latest Photos
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
More Pictures of the MHR Visit
by DaveK, July 19
Visit to the Factory- Historic Morgan Group
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,335
Posts812,893
Members9,203
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
kamo30
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 7
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 7
I fitted the SSL front kit many moons ago, and have been very pleased with the results. The only real issue for me is the need to keep adjusting the ride hide to get the optimum setting at regular intervals, say each service.

Last year I fitted the 5L rear and although the ride improvement was not as dramatic as I had hoped , it was an improvement. However the big bonus was a really drastic improvement in the handling. It has sharpened the turn-in, and taken completely tamed the rear end waywardness that is inherent using leaf springs and a powerful engine.

I think the balance between front and rear is really good, and the whole car feels so much better. I am now happy to let my wife drive fast in the wet and I will nod off in passengers seat (on longer journeys!)


Andy G
1999 +8 , Indigo Blue.
Ex-John McKecknie/Mike Duncan 1955 +4 racer.
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Talk Morgan Guru
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Just to add I wasn't referring to the SSL kit but MMC's own version and spec of such. On a mixed road 240 mile trip on Sunday the ride was considerably improved by having a heavily laden suitcase on the rear carrier although only myself and small dog as passenger. As expected not a hint of bottoming out due to high spring rate and dampening but definately favourable articulation, maybe requiring a click more on the front AVO's as well, highlighting how the rear affects the front as Cain had previously suggested.

To cast the net further as I believe the ARP4 had similar 5 link rear (and have been around longer), I wonder what spring and damper rates were used on those.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 7
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by Richard Wood
Just to add I wasn't referring to the SSL kit but MMC's own version and spec of such. .


I had assumed that, Richard.

I too have realised that playing around with the front suspension definitely affects the rear. In my case I have been trying to get the optimum setting for the front ride height (on the Suplex/SSL platforms) so the rebound springs are taken out of the initial loading on bump. This has had a big effect on the bump absorption at the front AND appears to have softened the rear as well (although I made no changes there)

To me the balance front/rear now feels pretty good running solo. I will be interested to see whether it changes when touring 2 up and laden.


Andy G
1999 +8 , Indigo Blue.
Ex-John McKecknie/Mike Duncan 1955 +4 racer.
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Talk Morgan Guru
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Just had a chat with Dan White at SSL. Apparently they are already working on alternative coil spring/damper units. Thoughts are that MMC went for excessively stiff units to limit roll. SSL's own 5 link offering has top links angled inwards to limit roll, so allowing softer springs. For the factory system which has parallel links top and bottom, they are hoping to provide progressive springing using two end to end to give a more immediate effect on roll control. Conversion when available in six to eight weeks, will be adjustable for both spring pre-load and damping.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 241
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 241
Richard, having discussed this with Dan a few times over the last 12 months, he knows the issues with mine (1st production 5link) problem is the spring length available on the MMC setup is difficult to get 2 coil springs in and not coil bind in compression, but fingers crossed he develops a solution


Jon M
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 149
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 149
Originally Posted by MOG 615
I too have realised that playing around with the front suspension definitely affects the rear. In my case I have been trying to get the optimum setting for the front ride height (on the Suplex/SSL platforms) so the rebound springs are taken out of the initial loading on bump. This has had a big effect on the bump absorption at the front AND appears to have softened the rear as well (although I made no changes there)

To me the balance front/rear now feels pretty good running solo. I will be interested to see whether it changes when touring 2 up and laden.

I have increased the size of the tyres to 195/65 R15 so this lifted the front end by 10mm. I then used 10X1mm shims (from the race kit courtesy of Peter Ballard) under and 10 over to lower the ride height to maintain the same front ride height of the car. On the rear, because we often tour with heavy luggage ( swmbo ) I have fitted slightly higher rated springs on the rear. I still need to play aroundd with the damping a little at the rear though. I still occasionally get bottoming out on bad bumps. It would be less of a problem if our roads were less of a problem swear


Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Talk Morgan Guru
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Originally Posted by CooperMan
Richard, having discussed this with Dan a few times over the last 12 months, he knows the issues with mine (1st production 5link) problem is the spring length available on the MMC setup is difficult to get 2 coil springs in and not coil bind in compression, but fingers crossed he develops a solution


Yes I mentioned to him the possibility of concentric springs to achieve desired progression but don't know if that's practical. His follow up suggested not. Apparently a single progressive spring wouldn't give the necessary roll resistance so final solution will be something of a balancing act.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Talk Morgan Guru
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
First complete assembled Spax coil spring/damper unit from SSL to address the over firm, over damped units on the factory 5 link rear. As promised adjustable spring pre-load and damping for these dual spring rate units.

[Linked Image]

Provisionally arranged to have a pair of these fitted next week at SSL allowing an immediate opportunity to evaluate drive



Last edited by Richard Wood; 02/09/19 09:49 PM.

Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 241
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 241
Well despite discussing with Dan over 14 months ago, us impecunious northerners are last in the queue

Many thanks for posting Richard, update patiently awaited, I'm so close to SSL you can call in for a cuppa


Jon M
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Talk Morgan Guru
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,916
Likes: 216
Long day travelling first to SSL and then return to Norfolk. Met the hospitable Dan White, a director of SSL, to have a pair of his prototype dual rate coilspring/damper units fitted. His able assistant Andy had them on in no time after jacking up the chassis just enough to remove weight on wheels and allow easy removal of mount bolts.

Meanwhile Dan explained just how they were going to work. The short higher rate spring at the bottom dilutes the rate of the longer softer spring giving an even lower overall spring rate initially as per the reciprocity formula of springs in series. After a calculated 25mm of suspension movement above static, the shorter spring becomes coil bound leaving the longer spring alone in play with consequent immediate increase in spring rate to limit roll.

As the new units were the same free length as OE, the swap over was very quick and easy.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Andy noticed the axle was not quite central to the chassis so that was tweaked as well via the panhard rod. Unfortunately this then left the wheels not centralised to the body, although only by a few mm, so a compromise was found. Dan and I then went for a 5 mile test drive on his favourite set of local roads.

I drove first and immediately noticed the expected softer ride. I could say it was like a magic carpet but that might be overcooking it wink It was a substantial improvement though with no more crashing over bumps as before. We tried a few speed bumps and it took those in its stride as well. What I wasn't expecting was an improvement to the cornering though. Sitting close to the back axle the improvement is felt literally through the seat of your pants. The sudden increase in spring rate limits roll even better than before increasing grip of tyre on outside of turn. This translates to even better tuck into corners although it was good before. Dan then had a very spirited drive and pronounced the settings as good as you could get in a single days testing. As mentioned before these units are adjustable for both spring pre-load (via locked base collar) and damping to compensate for driving style, touring etc.

Job done we retired to the pub for a late lunch followed by comfy drive home A very enjoyable and informative day.

I understand these units are now available for other 5 link Roadster owners.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5