Click here to return to the home page.
Classic Morgans
Who's Online Now
6 members (Craig Jezz, Julian BB, linklaw, +8Rich, rossocorsa, Grumpy2), 246 guests, and 43 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 91
Newest Members
Scot_SJI, Jimmers, Breen60, Davidmog, Stevecarr
9,596 Registered Users
Newest Topics
One for howard
by +8Rich - 28/08/26 10:05 AM
Renewing the twin aero horns
by Moggo - 27/08/26 05:24 PM
4-4 zetec Fuel filter
by Phil63 - 27/08/26 03:38 PM
CX Auto lock
by TeddyAds - 27/08/26 12:56 PM
3.7 Roadster Greasing Q
by ScottMellor - 26/08/26 05:31 PM
For Sale 4/4 Morgan exhaust Pipes
by stumog - 26/08/26 10:24 AM
Goodbye Dolly
by Clipper - 25/08/26 09:57 PM
Latest Photos
tow bar
tow bar
by G Walker, August 24
Prescott double anniversary
Prescott double anniversary
by CooperMan, August 18
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
by RedThree, August 13
Four-seater luggage rack
Four-seater luggage rack
by Soleng, August 9
New M3W orange 2012
New M3W orange 2012
by jejemek, August 7
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,843
Posts837,335
Members9,596
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
Christoph
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,356
Likes: 353
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,356
Likes: 353
I've also added some heat weave and a stainless cover, to keep some heat in the cat, because the first MoT was a bit marginal. This year with more insulation it was much better.

It's more exposed under the wing than inside the engine bay, and because it's a sports cat, needs all the help it can get!


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 68
Just Getting Started
OP Offline
Just Getting Started
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 68
Originally Posted by DaveW
I've also added some heat weave and a stainless cover, to keep some heat in the cat, because the first MoT was a bit marginal. This year with more insulation it was much better.


Ok, thanks for that, Dave. I think I understand the kind of stuff you mean by the term "heat weave" - but searching the words doesn't come up with anything useful. Any chance of a better steer to find something, or your favoured stuff and source, please?


Keith
2017 Plus 4, deep blue
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,356
Likes: 353
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Roadster Guru
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,356
Likes: 353


DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,662
Likes: 408
Needs to Get Out More!
Offline
Needs to Get Out More!
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,662
Likes: 408
Originally Posted by Max5
The following is something all owners of "modified" cars should be aware of.


"The Department for Transport are currently running a consultation on plans to legislate on vehicle modifications which may have an impact on our hobby.

The concern is although the aim to prevent owners modifying their vehicles in a way that may be detrimental in terms of emissions and the steps are aimed at owners of new / modern vehicles, there is no provision for classic vehicles and to pass the legislation in its current form could wipe out an entire industry at the stroke of a pen.

In its proposal “The Future of Transport Regulation”, the DfT says:

“We will create new offences for tampering with a system, part or component of a vehicle intended or adapted to be used on a road. This will enable us to address existing gaps in the legislation, ensuring cleaner and safer vehicles. We will also create new offences for tampering with non-road mobile machinery (NRMM) and for advertising ‘tampering’ services or products.

This will strengthen our ability to enforce compliance in this area.

We are aware that the Law Commissions in both their first and third consultations on automated vehicles have considered tampering. We await their final recommendations and would welcome views on our proposals, as follows.

Specifically, we would look to create:

a specific offence for supplying, installing and/or advertising, a ‘tampering product’ for a vehicle or NRMM – this would apply where a principal effect of the product is to bypass, defeat, reduce the effectiveness of or render inoperative a system, part or component (the product may be a physical part or component, hardware and/or software)

a specific offence for removing, reducing the effectiveness of, or rendering inoperative a system, part or component for a vehicle/NRMM and advertising such services

a specific offence for allowing for use or providing a vehicle or NRMM that has had the operations described in the previous 2 points performed on it

a new power to require economic operators to provide information, where a service/product they have supplied amounts to or enables ‘tampering’ with a vehicle or NRMM – this would apply in any of the above senses and include requirements to provide relevant information on the quantities of products sold or modified”

A number of influential spokespeople representing Owners Clubs, Magazines, STEM bodies and Suppliers have already spoken out over the detail in the proposal and are urging classic owners to make their feelings known on the proposal via the governments own feedback system which you can visit by clicking the link below:

https://www.gov.uk/government/consu...ing-vehicle-standards#tackling-tampering

The consultations runs from 28 September 2021 until 11:45pm on 22 November 2021."

Redacted from the FBHVC regulatory review.

The Federation has received a detailed written response from the DfT, who have given assurances that they
do not intend their proposals to prevent legitimate motorsport activities, prevent restoration, repairs or
legitimate improvements to vehicles, such as classic cars or motorbikes or to negatively impact businesses
involved in these activities. These assurances are reflected in the recent issue of an updated consultation
paper on the DfT website.
They also confirmed older vehicles will not be expected to comply with new type approval standards. The type
of activities they want to take more effective action against include tampering activities that prevent a
vehicle’s emissions system from operating correctly and as vehicles become increasingly automated, to
prevent alterations to a vehicle’s integral software and sensing technologies which create safety and security
risks. A badly modified “autonomous vehicle” for example, has the potential to kill its occupants and other
road users.
The prompt action by the Federation as a formal stakeholder, has produced a preliminary response from the
DfT that will offer reassurance to those who have expressed concerns about potentially damaging legislation.
Clearly, any subsequent draft legislative proposals will have to be examined carefully. As a formal stakeholder,
the Federation will be engaged in consultations on any future proposed legislation. It will also be providing a
full response to the Consultation to ensure that initial undertakings are maintained throughout the process.


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5