|
|
|
Forums34
Topics48,364
Posts813,335
Members9,215
| |
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,028 Likes: 15
Has a lot to Say!
|
OP
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,028 Likes: 15 |
Yes, John, you‘re Right.
It looks like I‘m the only one with fitting the bar on top of the washers. And yes, in the pictures no difference.
Greets René
2018 plus4 (sports green)
with a homemade really shiny red tinted dash…
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,941 Likes: 218
Talk Morgan Guru
|
|
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,941 Likes: 218 |
The BRB's help support the cross frame, in this case the upper suspension arm so it makes plain engineering sense to have that support as close as possible and in best contact with the frame. The exception is the upper shock absorber bracket which is broad and of substantial thickness to support shock loads and provide wing support, so also needs to be close to the action.
Richard
2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 309
Learner Plates Off!
|
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 309 |
All the pictures I've seen have not had the tyre rubbing blocks fitted. My '74 4/4 does have these and they make the fitting of the Williams supplied BRBs significantly more difficult. The bottom fixing almost fits with the forward mounting bolt of the blocks but I had to move this inboard (re-drilling block and chassis) to avoid the tyre rubbing on the BRB. The rear mounting bolt of the damper retainer also causes a bit of grief. Both fitted now but work needed on both sides.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
