Click here to return to the home page.
Classic Morgans
Who's Online Now
6 members (Dougie, DavidR, Mogdavid, RichardV6, BobJ, SteveMerch), 336 guests, and 40 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 65
Adam12 62
John V6 59
Newest Members
Chris Ontario, NickMog, YellowM, Dufty, Anted4
9,215 Registered Users
Newest Topics
For saleWood rim moto-lita
by hugo - 30/07/25 04:28 PM
For Sale 2015 M3W - £23,000
by MOG42 - 29/07/25 06:28 PM
AC Cobra Rep. Vs Plus 8
by Richardllll - 29/07/25 04:40 PM
Me Again
by Whizjet - 29/07/25 03:13 PM
Tyre dates on Yokohama tyres
by SteveMerch - 29/07/25 12:39 PM
Aero 8 Maintenance
by mph - 29/07/25 09:24 AM
Pur Sang Type 35
by BillHart - 28/07/25 06:49 PM
Latest Photos
Moto-lita for sale
Moto-lita for sale
by hugo, July 30
2015 M3W for sale
2015 M3W for sale
by MOG42, July 29
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,364
Posts813,344
Members9,215
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 6 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 242
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 242
Originally Posted by Colsmog
I was fortunate enough to buy CooperMan’s S1 roadster which came with the Bluefin to connect to the OBD port, if anyone would like to try this. I am willing to lend it out for the price of the postage to wherever, on condition that it is a loan and is returned to me after use.

Careful Colin, your bluefin will contain your OE mapping, if you lend it out it will upload your standard map to the new vehicle & then save their map onto your handset, so you could potentially loose your OE data completely


Jon M
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 53
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 53
What I love about this thread is that it's complete gobbledygook to me. I don't have a smartphone and I thought maps are for finding the way across Dartmoor in the fog, port is passed to the left, and bluefin is some kind of tuna, so my S2 Roadster won't be treated to a can of that anytime soon.


Peter
2009 3-litre Roadster "Ivor", royal ivory / green
SimonH #728898 30/12/21 05:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 242
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Just barreling along
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 242
Originally Posted by SimonH
Originally Posted by CooperMan
I used to sometimes drive it (cough) properly on the second set of cams and it would bounce on the rev limiter just the same, as you know they can be surprisingly quick


Second set of cams? It didnt have variable valve timing....

Probably my bad description, & I bow to your much deeper knowledge of the V6

I did think it had some form of variable cam phasing as each pair is driven by separate chains, allowing one pair of valves to have little effect until around 3500rpm, giving good economy at part throttle

As rpm increases above the economy level, the intake tracts open allowing the 4 valves to take effect with the ECU giving more advance via electronics and the cam phasing, hence the feeling of power & engine 'on song'

Am I close Simon ?


Jon M
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,942
Likes: 218
Talk Morgan Guru
Online NoMood
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 7,942
Likes: 218
I think it was the more powerful Jaguar variant that had VVT and variable air intakes Jon. The ST220 engine had DAMB (direct acting bucket tappets).


Richard

2018 Roadster 3.7
1966 Land Rover S2a 88
2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450
1945 Guzzi Airone
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,415
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,415
Originally Posted by CooperMan
Originally Posted by SimonH
Originally Posted by CooperMan
I used to sometimes drive it (cough) properly on the second set of cams and it would bounce on the rev limiter just the same, as you know they can be surprisingly quick


Second set of cams? It didnt have variable valve timing....

Probably my bad description, & I bow to your much deeper knowledge of the V6

I did think it had some form of variable cam phasing as each pair is driven by separate chains, allowing one pair of valves to have little effect until around 3500rpm, giving good economy at part throttle

As rpm increases above the economy level, the intake tracts open allowing the 4 valves to take effect with the ECU giving more advance via electronics and the cam phasing, hence the feeling of power & engine 'on song'

Am I close Simon ?


Not quite...
That's sort of how the Jaguar version works- but its only phasing the cam timing rather than opening extra valves - although that said it does have valves in the inlet manifold that lengthen or shorten the inlet tract


Originally Posted by RichardV6
I think it was the more powerful Jaguar variant that had VVT and variable air intakes Jon. The ST220 engine had DAMB (direct acting bucket tappets).


The Jaguar engine is the one with direct acting buckets, The Ford engine has finger followers


Simon @ Sifab.co.uk

Sifabtemporary@gmail.com
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 3
IvorMog Offline OP
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 3
Simon, while we've got you hooked on this subject laugh

Going back to my original question, do you know what the fundamental differences are between the S1 and S2 engines.

We know the Jag version of the 3.0 Litre Duratec has quite a few differences such as VVT, variable inlet tract and bucket followers etc but I'm struggling to see a big difference between the Mondeo S1 engine and the S2 Escape engine.

I think the cams might be slightly different and the derating of the S2 is, I think, by and large down to increased emissions demand by re-mapping to suit the intended US market.

However, I can't see a major difference in the "architecture" of the engines and the re-mapping that Williams did on my S2 engine easily bought it back to the S1 power rating.

I think both engines were built at the Cleveland Ohio Ford engine plant.

To quote Jon, "am I close Simon"


Bob

2009 Black Roadster
1999 4/4 2 litre Zetec
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,415
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,415
Originally Posted by IvorMog
Simon, while we've got you hooked on this subject laugh

Going back to my original question, do you know what the fundamental differences are between the S1 and S2 engines.

We know the Jag version of the 3.0 Litre Duratec has quite a few differences such as VVT, variable inlet tract and bucket followers etc but I'm struggling to see a big difference between the Mondeo S1 engine and the S2 Escape engine.

I think the cams might be slightly different and the derating of the S2 is, I think, by and large down to increased emissions demand by re-mapping to suit the intended US market.

However, I can't see a major difference in the "architecture" of the engines and the re-mapping that Williams did on my S2 engine easily bought it back to the S1 power rating.

I think both engines were built at the Cleveland Ohio Ford engine plant.

To quote Jon, "am I close Simon"


Different cams, different inlet manifold, different throttle body I think..

The S1 Roadster also had a lot more development on the "Black Oak" engine management system to suit the Morgan


Simon @ Sifab.co.uk

Sifabtemporary@gmail.com
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 91
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,342
Likes: 91
If I'm not mistaken the Mondeo engine has adjustable valves with tappets for better higher rpm and the Escape engine has hydraulic valve timing.


'14 4/4 graphite grey
Heinz #728960 31/12/21 05:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,415
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,415
Originally Posted by Heinz
If I'm not mistaken the Mondeo engine has adjustable valves with tappets for better higher rpm and the Escape engine has hydraulic valve timing.

Nope , they’re both hydraulic lifters….


Simon @ Sifab.co.uk

Sifabtemporary@gmail.com
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 3
IvorMog Offline OP
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,799
Likes: 3
The answer to this question lies in whether Ford used the same engine Stateside on the Contour, Taurus and Escape cars.

If they did, then I'm pretty certain that the Series 1 and Series 2 Roadster basic engines are to all intents and purposes identical. Including the camshafts.

The big uncertainty in my mind is whether Ford modified the engine in the Escape compared to the Contour.

The Ford Contour engine ( i.e. the American Mondeo ) had different air intake, exhaust and more importantly different ECU mapping compared to the Engine shipped to Europe for the Mondeo. However the base engine was identical from what I can see from my investigations.

The US spec Contour had 201hp compared to the European Mondeo ST220 having 222hp which relates very closely to the Morgan S1 v S2 engines having 223hp v 201hp (could be translation differences between SAE or DIN etc).

The big difference is in the ECU and mapping which is why I think it's relatively easy to bring the S2 engine up to the S1 performance specs.

However all that goes out of the window if Ford US modified the Contour engine when they fitted it to the Escape but I'm still working on that question crazy2

For me, the next big question is what did they do to upgrade the engine in the S3 ????


Bob

2009 Black Roadster
1999 4/4 2 litre Zetec
Page 6 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5