Forums34
Topics48,341
Posts812,996
Members9,208
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 11,220 Likes: 159
Smile, it confuses them Member of the Inner Circle
|
Smile, it confuses them Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 11,220 Likes: 159 |
Whilst Governments avoid bad news story lines, and can be populist/short term in their thinking, we really need to clear out the Civil Service as much of this 'blue sky' thinking/planning is beyond their comfort zone, in their basically 'personal risk averse' policy initiative and delivery environment. One of the great 'strategies' of the past to reduce CO2 emissions and reduce our future energy shortfall (in the not so distant past) was to get rid of our dirty energy consuming industries and become a service industry based economy. So now we don't make much ,have to import nearly everything, totally at risk of international supply lines and supply pressures with resultant upward costs. having invested little in a our energy generation and network before the recent push for renewables.
The politicians may leave a lot to be desired but from resource and continuity planning point the Civil Service has screwed up big style........ Apologies, I agree, I made a mistake in not highlighting both groups as being attached to the same issue. Being the first to the trough is very different from being a leader.
Everyone loves a Morgan. Even me, unless it's broken again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 975 Likes: 13
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 975 Likes: 13 |
I saw their thinking and action plans on the ' Millenium bug' The Y2K problem was very real, The media, for reasons best known to themselves, decided to trumpet this as "See? There wasn't an issue after all!" rather than "Bloody hell, those people did a good job, didn't they?"
As someone who was given a £4,000,000 budget to address Y2K issues, the problems and risks were hugely overidentified and hyped up by overpaid consultants. Once the issue with the main systems were addressed which in most cases was a relatively straightforward process the rest of the "problems"; embedded systems, telecoms, office system, PC's et al (largely) simply did not exist. I do not recall the media trumpeting as "see", but my response to "Bloody hell, those people did a good job, didn't they?" would have been Elephant powder.
Last edited by Rovert; 14/02/22 06:05 PM.
Brian
Jersey and Spain
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,878 Likes: 20
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,878 Likes: 20 |
250 miles in my Merc estate costs £30 of which 64% or £19 is the fuel itself.
That's genuinely impressive, at £1.40/litre that equates to over 80mpg. I can see why you're not fussed about EVs. I worked on £6 per gallon so maybe a week behind the times! But it doesnt matter really. The point is that there is a much smaller difference in fuel costs than Pete was suggesting. Currently its a false comparison caused by diesel having fuel tax on it and leccy not having - YET !!! Not that we are going to have any choice in the changeover anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794 Likes: 14
Formerly known as Aldermog Member of the Inner Circle
|
Formerly known as Aldermog Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794 Likes: 14 |
I think it is important to compare apples with apples.
I compare the cost of fueling a Tesla M3 Dual Motor, a very quick sports saloon with a 0-60 of 3.7 seconds with a similar performance AMG C63, that required 99 Octane fuel and managed about 25mpg. Comparing with a Mercedes diesel is not a realistic comparison.
Peter, 66, 2016 Porsche Boxster S No longer driving Tarka, the 2014 Plus 8...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,861 Likes: 137
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
|
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,861 Likes: 137 |
diesel having fuel tax on it and leccy not having - YET !!!
They aren't going to, it's impossible to tax electricity by type of use. They will bring in road pricing, focusing on motorways/high density routes at first, extending to other areas later. They won't drop fossil fuel tax to compensate either, they will use it to further 'persuade' people to switch away from ICE. One source suggests that they'll give everyone 3,000 miles/year 'free' road usage to lessen the impact on the less well-off (as they tend to drive much lower miles anyway). They are still apparently still thinking about charging mechanisms, my forecast is that it will probably be a tracking app for those who accept it, PAYG at a lower rate. Otherwise it'll be annual inspection at an MOT station with a higher rate applied to make up for the additional expense. Watch for further expansion of ANPR tech. Pretty much all new cars have built-in cellular tech anyway. I was amused to find my Mini has got two chips in it, one in the roof and one in the floor so the car can still summon help if it ends up upside down in a ditch.
Tim H. 1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,866 Likes: 167
Roadster Guru Member of the Inner Circle
|
Roadster Guru Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,866 Likes: 167 |
In the end, if you enjoy driving, you will find a way. Isn't this why we buy a Morgan as an antidote to modern cars?
None of us are forced to spend money on hobby cars or anything else, and so although the cost debate might be relevant to those who are forced to drive a modern car, that's the extent of it.
Even then, I want a modern which I enjoy driving. That's a really limited market.
DaveW '05 Red Roadster S1 '16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,044 Likes: 312
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,044 Likes: 312 |
Maybe we'll all end up with a 'CO2 Ration' we can spend as we see fit ..... if you want to sit in your underwear in a house heated to 80°, then you don't get to fly off on holiday .... unbridled touring enjoyment of your Morgan?, commute by electric scooter (or eat less meat).... would encourage genuine savings in CO2 and sensitise people to those areas of their lifestyle most damaging to the climate. And give back an element of control to individuals to decide where the pain falls in their particular set of likes and dislikes.
K
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,222 Likes: 123
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,222 Likes: 123 |
Maybe we'll all end up with a 'CO2 Ration' we can spend as we see fit ..... if you want to sit in your underwear in a house heated to 80°, then you don't get to fly off on holiday .... unbridled touring enjoyment of your Morgan?, commute by electric scooter (or eat less meat).... would encourage genuine savings in CO2 and sensitise people to those areas of their lifestyle most damaging to the climate. And give back an element of control to individuals to decide where the pain falls in their particular set of likes and dislikes.
K Would those without children therefore get a credit?
Paul Costock, UK 2014 4/4 Rolls Royce Garnet Red Disco 5 Teddy - 17h1 Irish Draught cross
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,044 Likes: 312
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,044 Likes: 312 |
PaulF .... Indeed .... and a healthy one, seeing as their offspring would have multiplied forever had they existed .... nipping a cascade of polluters in the bud must be seen as worthy of consideration! ..... another 'win' ... incentivising population reduction without the moral minefield of compulsion.
I've yet to see a downside to this! 🙂
K
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723 Likes: 149
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,723 Likes: 149 |
diesel having fuel tax on it and leccy not having - YET !!!
They aren't going to, it's impossible to tax electricity by type of use. They will bring in road pricing, focusing on motorways/high density routes at first, extending to other areas later. They won't drop fossil fuel tax to compensate either, they will use it to further 'persuade' people to switch away from ICE. In Italy VAT of 22% is charged on electricity used for charging BEVs. It can be reduced to 10% if the supply is only from photovoltaic panels. VAT of 22% applies to all industrial uses and 10% to domestic or residential (aged care etc.). A charging column can not be connected to a domestic supply but I think that slow charging can be done from a domestic supply. I don't yet have the problem so I don't know how it works.
Peter
|
|
|
|
|