7 members (chanteclair, HeadlessBlue, DavidR, Graham, G4FUJ, MATTMOG, John07, Lordofthewings),
315
guests, and
40
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums34
Topics48,362
Posts813,319
Members9,215
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27 |
Thank you for joining in, Image. A local legal professional is always helpful.  As noted earlier, I have no urge to get involved in in a Moot Court debate. I left such things behind more than half a century ago. Never liked the view from either behind a desk or a from a bench. I guess that, like the traditional body shape, there a cachet to having some continued input from the family to claim .... assists with the sense of continuous history. You mean the warm and fuzzy feeling thing? Yes. Lot of that going around. I learned to ignore it a long time ago...starting around February 2000. (wryly) Lorne talks of those with 'significant control' .... a minority family block doesn't fall under this heading ... not like 20% can force a decision their way. Though in the case of a disaster it might be enough to negotiate retention of the name in return for co-operation in other areas of the wind-up. Hopefully it never comes to that ... The entries in the East African Safari does indicate people at the top who are petrolheads ... I wish the company all success! Actually, we both know that the world mega-corporations and many others are normally tightly controlled by blocs of under 5%. These government rules are always silly and arbitary. It is why they are constantly expanded by the Courts to reflect the "de facto" situation rather than one merely "de jure". You will notice from Company House that most of the resigning and appointed MMC entities "possessing significant control": were not shareholders at all! gmg
Last edited by gomog; 12/12/23 03:12 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,055 Likes: 318
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 5,055 Likes: 318 |
Definitely not a legal professional (though that description may have been tongue in cheek to reflect my simplistic input 😄)
I doubt anyone other than Invest Industrial have any significant say in the future progress or direction of the company (money talks! ... that's when it's not just shouting orders that is 🙂) ... though the new majority shareholders may well be benign and even beneficial) ... I doubt considerations of history or tradition will carry any weight if the figures turn bad (other than maybe raising the price asked for the name when it gets sold on) ... not much sentiment floating around the acquisitions world.
K
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27 |
Could it be that man gets a large loan from his wife, they subsequently divorce, man pays back the loan with shares in the company? Sounds plausible to me but could easily be completely wrong. I have no inside knowledge. . Your timing is off..but you have a pretty accurate grasp (a testament to your acumen) though it is a small part of the story. Company House shows the MMC shareholding as after the dust settled: ![[Linked Image]](http://www.gomog.com/TEMP/FamilyShareholding.jpg) Add it up. The tale leading up to the sale can be gleaned from examining the statements from 1999 to 2019, tho a tiny bit of forensic training would be very helpful. It puts the 2019 sale in a different light. Some would even muse that the company was not happily managed. (NOT me of course!!) The British government helped a lot. [quote=howard]. Carlyle is the largest, by far, backer of II. Dig a bit more ex-MMC. Carlyle notes similar arrangements with more than 2000 companies worldwide. 5h largest private equity concern on the planet!!!! Yes. I know Carlyle as well. However, I cannot see them involved with something this small. This seems to be a Morgan petrol-head (like us) purchase by the brothers. Bravo! There hasn't been a real petrol head at the helm for two decades. If we can, from what we see so far, we should help them.They might not understand today's Morgan community, but then, neither do I! gmg (a perennial optimist)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 14
New to Talk Morgan
|
OP
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 14 |
Lorne,
According to those numbers of shareholding, If after Peter's death, his 48,000 shares were splitted equally between Charles, Lady Colwyn and Mrs Price, each of them got 16,000 shares.
Then, Charles came up with 30,000 + 16,000 = 46,000 shares and Lady Colwyn and Mrs Price with 26,000 shares each, ending with a combined 52,000 shares in total.
Charles found himself in a minority position after P.H.G. Morgan death. Am I wrong ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 6,061 Likes: 160
Talk Morgan Sage
|
Talk Morgan Sage
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 6,061 Likes: 160 |
One of the directors of SPORTS CARS (ENGLAND) ACQUISITIONS LIMITED is Lawrence Price so there's still some family influence there.
1972 4/4 4 seater, 1981 MGB GT 1984 Harley Davidson Electra Glide, 1990 Kawasaki ZX10
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27 |
One of the directors of SPORTS CARS (ENGLAND) ACQUISITIONS LIMITED is Lawrence Price so there's still some family influence there. I don't see that. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/11838903/officers Can you post your link? More importantly, a few of the middle management haven't changed.
Last edited by gomog; 12/12/23 07:14 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27 |
Thank you TBM. However, as I mentioned earlier. The deeper one delves into corporate organization, the farther one strays from the essentials one wants/needs to know. The Mr. Lawrence Henry Peregrine Price mentioned is a principal in ROCKWORTH MANAGEMENT PARTNERS LIMITED. Is that good person the husband of the younger of PM's two daughters, the hospital administrator and a Trustee of the Morgan Family Trust. If so, I imagine he has as much say in the decisions that concern us as his fellow director in the company, Lord Beaverbrooke.  In my experience, concerns like InvestIndustriel need a map to understand and trace..all to no end that should interest us. BTW, the same source states that this company began as Industrial Growth Collective S.C.A though that could have been the name of a dormant shelf company.  We could go on forever. Do we really need to know anything more than who ultimately makes the decisions? There is more trivia but let us end this area of inquiry here. gmg
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 775 Likes: 27 |
According to those numbers of shareholding, If after Peter's death, his 48,000 shares were splitted equally between Charles, Lady Colwyn and Mrs Price, each of them got 16,000 shares. Gilles, this is better over a beer. I started writing an comprehensive answer and quit after too many paragraphs. The full story would take a book. The shortest I can do, even using only Company House: 1. The 2002 filed statement states that PM's shares were in the Morgan Family settlement (which I refer to as the "trust". The 2002 statement was filer at the end of 2003, after Peter had passed. 2. I believe Heather became the sole beneficiary with the Trustees being Jillian's husband along with PM's close friend and solicitor, Andrew Duncan, the younger brother of Mike Duncan. . 3. Heather also inherited the Pickersleigh land and building, which Peter, like HFS before him, had always held personally, a common business practice that continues to this day. 4. Jane's pivotal shares, (she pre-deceased PM by four months, were evenly divided among their children. 5. The MMC charter was changed and last shares were made the only voting shares and all others, were non-voting. Charles found himself in a minority position after P.H.G. Morgan death. Am I wrong ? At no time was Charles Morgan in other than a minority voting position during his entire tenure with the Company. He was also never elected Chairman. He was removed from the Company by the other voting shareholders in 2013. Lawsuits, which are of public record, ensued. By that time I had moved on to other interests for a long time. I did not track them but I know you can find the public court records. Settled long ago, I presume. gmg ![[Linked Image]](http://www.gomog.com/TEMP/endof2003Non~TrustShareholders.jpg)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 6,061 Likes: 160
Talk Morgan Sage
|
Talk Morgan Sage
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 6,061 Likes: 160 |
Thank you TBM. However, as I mentioned earlier. The deeper one delves into corporate organization, the farther one strays from the essentials one wants/needs to know.
The Mr. Lawrence Henry Peregrine Price mentioned is a principal in ROCKWORTH MANAGEMENT PARTNERS LIMITED. Is that good person the husband of the younger of PM's two daughters, the hospital administrator and a Trustee of the Morgan Family Trust. Lawrence Price is the Great Grandson of HFS, Grandson of Peter. He was appointed Non Executive Chairman following the resignation of Steve Morris, Details were in the press statement from MMC on the 22/12/22. He has previously a Non Executive Director of MMC - appointed in 2012. I think much of this thread is now mere supposition and conjecture rather than solid fact.
1972 4/4 4 seater, 1981 MGB GT 1984 Harley Davidson Electra Glide, 1990 Kawasaki ZX10
|
|
|
|
|