|
1 members (Alan Patterson),
178
guests, and
49
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums39
Topics49,846
Posts837,382
Members9,596
| |
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 48
Just Getting Started
|
OP
Just Getting Started
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 48 |
Just come across this as the emissions specification after the recent visit from the ministry on the M3W.
How does this translate into the UK emissions bands for vehicle excise duty (car tax)?
Life is Better by the Sea
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,838 Likes: 9
le Asbo du Bling Talk Morgan Addict
|
|
le Asbo du Bling Talk Morgan Addict
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,838 Likes: 9 |
Salcombe
Are you sure you have this right as it must be running on fresh air. For comparison a Prius is 92g/km?
Slowly going green
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009
Member of the Inner Circle
|
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009 |
Well...I hope it isn't 384g/km 
Jays
Former Morgan owner. Gone but hopefully not forgotten!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 48
Just Getting Started
|
|
OP
Just Getting Started
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 48 |
Does'nt sound right if that equates up to 384 as you say. There is a specification update on the Mogwire site with speeds, weight etc. where this was listed.
It would make the tax disc very expensive, I think there is a mistake somewhere.
Life is Better by the Sea
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009
Member of the Inner Circle
|
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009 |
It probably won't be very green CO2 wise...motorbike engines, especially large twins don't tend to run as cleanly as car engines. I seem to remember a figure around 260 quoted at one time.
Jays
Former Morgan owner. Gone but hopefully not forgotten!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,894 Likes: 351
Salty Sea Dog Member of the Inner Circle
|
|
Salty Sea Dog Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,894 Likes: 351 |
Maybe it's 0.384kg  Wouldn't surprise me if Mogwire had the '.' in the wrong place...
Graham (G4FUJ)
Sold L44FOR 4/4 Giallo Fly
'11 MINI Countryman Cooper D All4
'90 LR 90 SW
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 33
Just Getting Started
|
|
Just Getting Started
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 33 |
Mogwire does seem a bit tabloid and I am not sure where they get their information from. Phone hacking? Perhaps they should be interviewed by Leveson.
Maybe the Mogwire specification refers to carbon monoxide (CO) emitted rather than (CO2) hence the confusingly low value. Who knows?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 76
Just Getting Started
|
|
Just Getting Started
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 76 |
Note the difference:
CO = Carbon Monoxide (Fatal gas, data from Mogwire)
CO2 = Carbon Dioxide (global warming gas, data used for Road tax)
The CO2 figures are related to and can be estimated from the Fuel consumtion.
M3W 2012 (nr 32)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 782
Talk Morgan Regular
|
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 782 |
There was a figure published when Clarkson scribbled a brief (positive!) review a couple of months back. Might have been Sunday Times or similar but can't remember. The figure given there was about 214g/Km CO2 or similar. That's the only time I've seen something quoted as far as I can recall - no idea if it was right or is being re-tested / reassessed.
That would still be rather high but would be more consistent with other comments above. I don't think 384 g/Km is possible - that would mean about 16 mpg.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,894 Likes: 351
Salty Sea Dog Member of the Inner Circle
|
|
Salty Sea Dog Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,894 Likes: 351 |
I don't think 384 g/Km is possible - that would mean about 16 mpg. Unless Clarkson was driving for the emissions tests?
Graham (G4FUJ)
Sold L44FOR 4/4 Giallo Fly
'11 MINI Countryman Cooper D All4
'90 LR 90 SW
|
|
|
|
|
