Click here to return to the home page.
Classic Morgans
Who's Online Now
5 members (Clipper, Davetherave, MartO, TBM, vincentvg), 295 guests, and 89 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 79
Newest Members
Scot_SJI, Jimmers, Breen60, Davidmog, Stevecarr
9,596 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Cars and boats vid
by Luddite - 04/09/26 09:04 AM
Boats alongsidish last night
by +8Rich - 03/09/26 11:57 PM
Steering bearings
by Ricosan - 03/09/26 06:30 PM
Tyres for 1990 +8
by CJB - 03/09/26 11:16 AM
2018 Sigma 4/4 ride height
by Neville1 - 02/09/26 09:10 PM
CX moaners
by Malachy - 02/09/26 01:20 PM
Plus 4 Steering rack gaiter
by Strathaven - 02/09/26 12:42 PM
Latest Photos
Wales
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
tow bar
tow bar
by G Walker, August 24
Prescott double anniversary
Prescott double anniversary
by CooperMan, August 18
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
by RedThree, August 13
Four-seater luggage rack
Four-seater luggage rack
by Soleng, August 9
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,871
Posts837,682
Members9,596
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
Rudolf
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 17 of 17 1 2 15 16 17
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,262
Likes: 320
Scruffy Oik
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Scruffy Oik
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,262
Likes: 320
Fair enough, I missed the word 'legally'. The trouble is that under the S.165 Road Traffic Act, if the car was ever stopped and found to be illegally modified, there's the possibility of immediate seizure as the insurance would be invalidated? (Unless the insurance company was happy to still provide cover with an illegally modified car, which I find difficult to believe).

It's the old adage, "Don't break the law when you're breaking the law". Driving around with no Cat is extraordinarily unlikely to attract any attention, but driving around with a straight-through silencer is exactly the kind of thing that does.

Under Section 59 of the Police Reform Act 2002, officers can seize vehicles driven in a way that causes "alarm, distress or annoyance" (such as excessive exhaust noise or reckless driving). I'm sure Montegue would never drive recklessly on public roads, but the noise alone might be a concern?

I'm sure Monty is capable of making his own decisions, but for a car used regularly on the road, sacrificing a few bhp to remain legal would be my preference.


Tim H.
1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
1 member likes this: Burgundymog
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,855
Likes: 401
J
Talk Morgan Addict
Offline
Talk Morgan Addict
J
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 3,855
Likes: 401
Originally Posted by Image
Hamwich ... I presume you also believe that the handgun ban means there's not a single gun on our streets and shootings are a thing of the past ... and that the Travelling Community bend over backwards to ensure they scrupulously follow the letter of the Planning Regulations!! 😆

K

Very true, but responsible people wouldn't use the Travelling Community as a bench mark for acceptable behaviour, but hey ho that's just my opinion for what its worth.. I just lost interest in this exercise when the empthasis is just on BHP for a car used on the road, where once over the speed limit, top speed becomes academic, whereas acceleration and driveability ie torque IMHO is more important. And to be honest, i'd have bought a Roadster by now and transferred the front suspension over and made a really great car, which had more than enough power but could be expanded further if felt necessary.

But as they say each to their own.

Last edited by JohnHarris; 04/09/26 12:30 PM.

22 Plus Four KIMI
12 Plus 4 Sport OZZY
08 Roadster FELIX
06 4/4 70th LOKI
77 4/4 SEAMUS
85 4/4 MOLLY
Page 17 of 17 1 2 15 16 17

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5