|
|
|
Forums34
Topics48,335
Posts812,893
Members9,203
| |
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,424 Likes: 26
Talk Morgan Addict
|
Talk Morgan Addict
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,424 Likes: 26 |
Pandy,
I'm recently off the crutches after a 3 month stint following reconstruction of the Quadriceps tendon just above my knee so she has my sympathies(I too have a few screws in the kneecap for my pleasure!!) -- The (partially!)good bit is that the Morgan was the easiest car to be in once I was allowed start to bend my knee as it was straighter in it than in the tin-top!! It was also the easiest to get back to driving!!
I hope she recovers quickly and doesn't get too bored with daytime TV!!!
Cheers!
Robbie
2021 Plus Four -- Helga
211-WX-1433
"Fettlebodge"--A chief of the PaddyMogs
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 209
L - Learner Plates On
|
|
L - Learner Plates On
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 209 |
Being one of the masochists who drives a pre WW2 car, yes it looks good but in my opinion...how about a new Alvis!http://www.alviscars.co.uk/alviscars.php
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 836
Talk Morgan Regular
|
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 836 |
I think the only difference is that Morgan is producing new cars which look old whereas these companies are just remaking cars using 70+ year old technology.
It does make me wonder though, if Morgan did rebuild a Morgan three wheeler from prewar period using all old technology, would anyone buy them? How much would they sell for?
Furthermore, how will these companies pass the stringent modern crash tests?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,004
Has a lot to Say!
|
|
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,004 |
A thing of beauty all the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
