It has to be said that some of the requirements make sense and it would not be unreasonable for Morgan to incorporate them into general production. Nothing would be lost by incorporating the higher roll-over protection, head rest/padding, and high level brake light.
You can add them as options (aka consumer choice)... I did (raised roll bars anyway - substituted reflectors for the high level brake light!).
...The M3W indicators were always in a strange position and I have often wondered why they could not be mounted on the top of the mudguards at the front.
They also "cook" next to the exhausts (remember the cases of them melting?). A side/tail/indicator light on top of the mudguard would make sense, but realistically they should be offering them built into LED headlight units as an option.
Regarding the "moustache" ; I do understand the need for pedestrian safety but an M3W is never going to match a car and in this case it is more reasonable to treat it like a motorcycle. A Moto Guzzi California, for example, is not obliged to be fitted with bumpers.
I thought the moustache was something to do with emissions control - oh well! If you want pedestrian safety surely you need some other car... or maybe a cow catcher or a wire cage over the front?
BACK ON TOPIC: I always wondered why dashcams are not built-in? Hardware is cheap, and company car insurance would surely benefit...
