|
|
|
9 members (GrumpyPa, RichardV6, JohnHarris, +8Rich, John V6, IcePack, Chris Cosher, Graham, G4FUJ, MartinB60),
258
guests, and
38
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
|
|
|
|
|
Forums39
Topics49,904
Posts838,094
Members9,635
| |
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,945 Likes: 28
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,945 Likes: 28 |
No, its cant be trusted in the sense you interpret is. The cell size for the weather models is, I believe 12km square so the best forecast you can get is a prediction for that area. Within that area there are local effects which can generate cloud or rain or wind but in any case the forecast for the cell itself is a probability one rather than certainty. And since both you ans us are on the join between two air masses with the jetstream passing nearby, the probabilities that are in any forcast arent high.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
