I strongly believe the "A Morgan is a Morgan...." adage so don't really care if it's actually described as an Aero or a trad. However it's pretty obvious that MMC see it as a trad, or do they?
The adage was always
"A Morgan needs no explanation, it simply is." I am not sure what "a Morgan is a Morgan is a Morgan" is supposed to convey. Does it mean there are no differences between models or their desirability?
With that in mind, DaveW gets my vote. Everything about this model is Aero. Chassis, suspension, steering, braking, weight, engine management, even the dated BMW 4.8Ls.
From the other side of the fence, it has nothing trad about it (aside from a very carefully chosen camera angle from the side). Far too wide as the MMC themselves always predicted it would be.
If performance is wanted, the 3.7 Roadster will produce as much or more of it than this one and comes in a far prettier package.
