I don't take the magazine but the 'quality of the magazine's production and presentation' bit doesn't bode well ... expect thick paper and arty photographs in place of technical info and grassroots articles ... have seen a number of specialist bike magazines go that way ... cofffee table fodder for hipsters ... you see similar in the museum world .... multi-million pound refurb and it comes back with half the physical atrifacts and a lot of arty 'information panels' explaining their 'context' in a way that reflects the current orthodoxy.
Hope I'm wrong for the sake of the subscribers.
K
