Click here to return to the home page.
Morgan 3 Wheeler
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 335 guests, and 34 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 90
Newest Members
Scot_SJI, Jimmers, Breen60, Davidmog, Stevecarr
9,596 Registered Users
Newest Topics
Renewing the twin aero horns
by Moggo - 27/08/26 05:24 PM
4-4 zetec Fuel filter
by Phil63 - 27/08/26 03:38 PM
CX Auto lock
by TeddyAds - 27/08/26 12:56 PM
3.7 Roadster Greasing Q
by ScottMellor - 26/08/26 05:31 PM
Goodbye Dolly
by Clipper - 25/08/26 09:57 PM
Hot start .... vapour lock
by Pittsartist - 25/08/26 08:00 PM
Immobiliser
by Clipper - 25/08/26 12:42 PM
Latest Photos
tow bar
tow bar
by G Walker, August 24
Prescott double anniversary
Prescott double anniversary
by CooperMan, August 18
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
by RedThree, August 13
Four-seater luggage rack
Four-seater luggage rack
by Soleng, August 9
New M3W orange 2012
New M3W orange 2012
by jejemek, August 7
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,841
Posts837,323
Members9,596
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
Christoph
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,553
Likes: 88
Talk Morgan Guru
Offline
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,553
Likes: 88
Originally Posted By Michael H


My lady friend either has to join me full time or I will have to settle for weights...


Michael.

I would be very careful how you approach this issue with your lady friend, or you could be in a world of trouble!!
doh

As for the point of additional weight/carrying a passenger; on a vehicle that is as light as an M3W, the weight of the driver and passenger is a significant percentage of the overall weight. So this could become an interesting area for discussion.
I have driven an M3W both solo and with a passenger, albeit only over a short distance and I felt it was noticeably more planted when two-up.

Bud
__________
2003 - 4/4


Bud
4/4 "Stanley"
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 11
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 11
Originally Posted By Budster
Originally Posted By Michael H


My lady friend either has to join me full time or I will have to settle for weights...
I would be very careful how you approach this issue with your lady friend, or you could be in a world of trouble!!
doh


On the same order as "Does this make me look fat?"


What's your mileage? Who cares. Is it practical? See #1. What happens when it rains? You get wet.
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 12
P
PaulJ Offline OP
Talk Morgan Addict
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Addict
P
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 12
Best of luck.


Paul
[At last, I have a car I can polish]
PaulJ #135455 11/05/13 06:49 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3
D
New to Talk Morgan
Offline
New to Talk Morgan
D
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3
To follow up on my report about setting the front end to 1/16" toe-in, I did all measurements with the car unladen.

And my front end is supported by Spax shocks, car built Jan 2013.

Does anyone have a sense for which 'direction' the toe would go as the car is laden? Certainly other aspects of the geometry will change with more weight.

Steve Black

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 360
P
PJB Offline
Learner Plates Off!
Offline
Learner Plates Off!
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 360
Some inputs - The reason for the increase in front ride height when MMC moved from SUPLEX to SPAX is that the SUPLEX units had a clever elastomeric 'spring assist' on the damper rod (like a very posh long durable closed cell foam bump stop) that came into contact quite soon in bump to give a rising rate (nice!), but when SPAX got the business they did not use a rising rate so increased the ride height instead to minimise full bump impacts. This is compounded as the geometry itself actually gives a falling rate which is bad.
Thus the SUPLEX units actually have less travel in bump than the SPAX but then contol it better. The less bump travel of the SUPLEX units also minimised the amount of bump steer, hence with the SUPLEX units there is no noticeable bump steer (well I did not notice any). From what I see, the wheels toe-in with bump, but I do not know the full relationship of suspension travel with steer. Obviously it can be designed out with correct rack height and track rod length or minimised with bump travel control as originally. Also if the direction of bump steer with travel is consistent then it is easy to cope with compared with bump steer that goes from toe-out to toe-in or significantly increases in bump.
The SPAX units also have lots of rebound travel, whereas the SUPLEX units have an internal spring in the unique damper that is effectively a rebound spring so minimising rebound travel and thus significantly increasing roll stiffness.
The SPAX units try to control rebound with excessive rebound damping which is maybe OK for a single excursion into a pothole or a single change of direction, but can causes 'jacking down' of the vehicle over a series of inputs. This is when the wheel can not rebound fully before the next bump, hence the wheel gets jacked up over a series of bumps, such as the bumpy kerbs on the inside of a race track until the suspension is on full bump waiting for the next bump - with no more suspension travel - ah -wonder what happens then?
I hope this helps. SUPLEX upgrades available soon I hear ;-)
I've forgoten what the question was now........
Best regards PJB.


4/4 2.0 Zetec SSL front and rear
PaulJ #139416 09/06/13 04:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 360
P
PJB Offline
Learner Plates Off!
Offline
Learner Plates Off!
P
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 360
I have been informed by the MD of SUPLEX that SUPLEX now have the development upgraded front suspension unit for the new M3W. These will replace the current SPAX units and will actually be more sophisticated than the SUPLEX units fitted to the first cars produced. They incorporate:
1. Rising spring rate with a main spring and a 'spring assist' on the damper rod. So a soft initial rate to reduce 'kickback' then stiffens in bump and cornering to reduce 'bump steer'.
2. Rebound spring incorporated in the damper to reduce roll by not allowing the inner wheel on hard corners to droop, thus also reducing 'roll steer'.
3. Adjustable main spring so that the designated ride height can be set for all weights of passenger to ensure rebound spring is just kissing at static ride height.
4. Adjustable damper bump & rebound together.
Should be good - regards PJB


4/4 2.0 Zetec SSL front and rear
PJB #139447 09/06/13 06:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 6,538
N
Talk Morgan Sage
Offline
Talk Morgan Sage
N
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 6,538
That sounds v good - any idea on £cost?


Neil

NeilL #139499 10/06/13 05:25 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 5
D
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
D
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 5
Wonder if MMC would like to buy some nearly new Spax front dampers?

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 12
P
PaulJ Offline OP
Talk Morgan Addict
OP Offline
Talk Morgan Addict
P
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,560
Likes: 12
I would be very interested to hear the feedback when they start getting fitted.

It has come to my ears that MMC may be looking at redesigning the front wheels and going to centre lacing. I have an idea that they may be doing some testing quite soon. It will be interesting to see if this rumour is true or not.


Paul
[At last, I have a car I can polish]
PaulJ #140171 13/06/13 03:22 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,213
H
HJP Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
H
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,213
In the latest MOG Magazine Colin Terry the ' advanced driving expert' states that 'hitting a pot hole will result in a momentary small movement of the steering wheel ' ....!!!


Hugh
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5