Click here to return to the home page.
Morgan Aero 8
Who's Online Now
4 members (Pipmac, Bunny, John Winn, Alan Patterson), 266 guests, and 39 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 87
Newest Members
Scot_SJI, Jimmers, Breen60, Davidmog, Stevecarr
9,596 Registered Users
Newest Topics
One for howard
by +8Rich - 28/08/26 10:05 AM
Renewing the twin aero horns
by Moggo - 27/08/26 05:24 PM
4-4 zetec Fuel filter
by Phil63 - 27/08/26 03:38 PM
CX Auto lock
by TeddyAds - 27/08/26 12:56 PM
3.7 Roadster Greasing Q
by ScottMellor - 26/08/26 05:31 PM
For Sale 4/4 Morgan exhaust Pipes
by stumog - 26/08/26 10:24 AM
Goodbye Dolly
by Clipper - 25/08/26 09:57 PM
Latest Photos
tow bar
tow bar
by G Walker, August 24
Prescott double anniversary
Prescott double anniversary
by CooperMan, August 18
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
Air Crash Sites: Cairngorms
by RedThree, August 13
Four-seater luggage rack
Four-seater luggage rack
by Soleng, August 9
New M3W orange 2012
New M3W orange 2012
by jejemek, August 7
Forum Statistics
Forums39
Topics49,843
Posts837,341
Members9,596
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
Today's Birthdays
Christoph
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 123
Part of the Furniture
Offline
Part of the Furniture
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 123
Originally Posted By Peter J
Originally Posted By Budster
[.



There is nothing, other than a Caterham 160, that is cheap & I'm not sure it is comparable with anything.
Perhaps the base MX5 sets the floor level at £18.5K.

Consider the following, remember we are comparing "new with new" and excluding extras and delivery.

Car.............Engine...Price

Caterham 160....1.6.....£15,000
Mazda MX5.......1.8.....£18,500
Mini Roadster....1.6.....£21,000
Audi TT ..........1.8.....£26,500
Lotus Elise......1.6.....£28,000
Morgan 4/4....1.6.....£33,075
BMW Z4 ........2.8.....£33,650
Mercedes E Cab..2.5....£34,500
Mercedes SLK...2.5.....£35,720
Morgan +4....2.0.....£36,285
BMW 4 Series...3.5.....£41,000
Morgan Roadster 3.7..£45,900
Poesche Boxster.3.4.....£47,035
Caterham 620 R..2.0.....£50,000
Lotus Exige.....3.7.......£52,900
Jaguar F.........5.0.......£65,000
Mercedes SLK....5.0......£83,445
Morgan +8....4.8.......£85,200

So:
"Poverty" Models need to be under £30K. The 4/4 needs to be about £27K, not £33K
"Mid Stream" models should be between £30K and £40K, the +4 is well priced.
"Blow" modesl should be between £50K and £80K: the Plus 8 is too expensive.

Conclusion:
MMC are not too far off the market prices in the middle, especially when considering the brand value and iconic hand built status.....no coincidence then that the Plus 4 is the best seller...

The 4/4 needs to be less than £30K to be attractive.

The Roadster sits in a difficult place: it isn't that expensive when compared with a base Boxster, but it is not comparable dynamically or as far as bild quality is concerned.

The Plus 8 is over priced. possibly why it doesn't sell that well but at £70K it would compare more realistically with things like the F Type and SLK. In terms of performance and refinement it is already there, it is just too expensive.



Not sure what comes as standard with a Plus 8 but a Plus 4 needs £10k approx of "extras" before I would consider it.

Mx5 or Audi TT might only need say, metallic paint to make it acceptable.

Think bumpers and sun visors are standard?

Still wouldn't swap though!


2021 Lapis Blue Plus 6 evil You know it makes sense! thinking
2016 Carmine Red 991.2 C4S





Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 37,405
Likes: 977
Tricky Dicky
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Tricky Dicky
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 37,405
Likes: 977
Originally Posted By kin
Originally Posted By 4/4sportsfun


The world is full of armchair experts. hide
...and don't forget plenty of keyboard warriors too :xmastree: grin2


Much the same thing with or without light sabre grin2 :xmastree:


2009 4/4 Sport Henrietta
1999 Indigo Blue +8
2009 4/4 Sport Green prev
1993 Con Green +8 prev





Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 107
S
L - Learner Plates On
Offline
L - Learner Plates On
S
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 107
:xmascheers: I agree Aerotaff,prices did sky rocket even through recession hit Britain ? And when prices rise significantly so do people's expectations of the end product ! I love the Morgan brand ,but like many club members are concerned about the future . Does the factory engage with the clubs do they look at talk morgan ? For many companies ,customer feedback is essential ,the truth sometimes hurts ,but enables a window for rectification and progression and that's what we ALL WANT HERE ON TALK MORGAN !

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794
Likes: 15
Peter J Offline OP
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle
OP Offline
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794
Likes: 15
Originally Posted By kin
[

I would honestly think at least one member would know the cost of the Aero bonded chassis, that person has to be Brian aka Aeroman.

I will take a very wild guess the chassis cost no more than £10k, but will gracefully accept being proved wrong smile


I have been told by a Morgan Dealer that for the dealer to buy a new Trad chassis is less than £1000 and to buy an Aero tub is over £20,000. Both plus VAT.

That suggests MMC buys them in at 50% of the sale price. so less than £500 vs more than £10K. A factor of 20.

I'm not surprised at the difference.

The Trad chassis is made of about 20 different bits of bent steel, something that a good welder could, with the right jig, put together in an hour or so. It is then galvanized.

The Aero Tub has to be assembled from a large number of carefully cut pieces of aluminium that must be cleaned and then with great care, adhesive applied in the correct places, pop rivets fitted and then it is subject to a heating process to cure the adhesive.

Then various extrusions and machined parts are welded in place. The welds are of aviation quality. I'll bet it takes more than a day.

It is a work of art.

But it is total overkill for what it has to do....!


Peter,
66, 2016 Porsche Boxster S
No longer driving Tarka, the 2014 Plus 8...

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 89
Talk Morgan Expert
Offline
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,562
Likes: 89
Originally Posted By Peter J
Originally Posted By kin
[

I would honestly think at least one member would know the cost of the Aero bonded chassis, that person has to be Brian aka Aeroman.

I will take a very wild guess the chassis cost no more than £10k, but will gracefully accept being proved wrong smile


I have been told by a Morgan Dealer that for the dealer to buy a new Trad chassis is less than £1000 and to buy an Aero tub is over £20,000. Both plus VAT.

That suggests MMC buys them in at 50% of the sale price. so less than £500 vs more than £10K. A factor of 20.

I'm not surprised at the difference.

The Trad chassis is made of about 20 different bits of bent steel, something that a good welder could, with the right jig, put together in an hour or so. It is then galvanized.

The Aero Tub has to be assembled from a large number of carefully cut pieces of aluminium that must be cleaned and then with great care, adhesive applied in the correct places, pop rivets fitted and then it is subject to a heating process to cure the adhesive.

Then various extrusions and machined parts are welded in place. The welds are of aviation quality. I'll bet it takes more than a day.

It is a work of art.

But it is total overkill for what it has to do....!

Makes you realise how much of a steal the original Aero 8 was - bringing that level of tech to the market at that price point. A positive bargain - more so now.

The Aero chassis is of a design level more akin to the SLS Black or Aston V8/12/DB9..... Literally light years beyond where Morgan were even at the developmental level at the time (Charles and Bill's +8 British GT2 car). It's a design building block to something we've yet to see matched by engine, gearbox and body.

Only when all are at the same/similar level will buyers really feel they are buying quality. This is unlikely to look like a trad. Maybe a future SLR or SS Coupe/Targa.

A better trad does not need this level of tech to improve, there is 60 years of better cheaper automotive engineering to choose from.

As a buyer if you really did want to stick with a trad as it is now, there are all the second hand ones to choose from - just stick the latest engine/gearbox in it and off you go - just like a new one. [toungue in cheek]


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
Has to be said that continual slow development of the trad could probably have been funded from company resources and profits. Unfortunately there has been little development apart from necessary engine changes in the last decade or more.

In order to fund the Aero Charles had a rush of enthusiasm and sold the "farm". The sales of Aero based cars are unlikely to ever buy it back, and now they have to pay rent for what was once their own property.

The Aero is a wonderful achievement but I doubt it could be considered a financial success.


Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794
Likes: 15
Peter J Offline OP
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle
OP Offline
Formerly known as Aldermog
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 15,794
Likes: 15
Originally Posted By Gambalunga


The Aero is a wonderful achievement but I doubt it could be considered a financial success.


Peter, I think that sums up this thread....!


Peter,
66, 2016 Porsche Boxster S
No longer driving Tarka, the 2014 Plus 8...

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
It all comes back to something I have said before. I don't see why a re-engineered trad chassis with an updated front suspension, coil rear suspension, slightly wider cockpit (for the larger bodied occupants one finds these days) and perhaps some careful work to introduce more luggage space, would not be possible without impacting too much on the price.

Options such as drophead coupè with delux Aero type hood would be possible too.

PS. And while we are at it lets have a nice 200 or 210 hp engine with good torque characteristics.

Last edited by Gambalunga; 24/12/14 07:45 AM. Reason: PS

Peter

[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 12
S
Talk Morgan Regular
Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
S
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 12
Originally Posted By Gambalunga
It all comes back to something I have said before. I don't see why a re-engineered trad chassis with an updated front suspension, coil rear suspension, slightly wider cockpit (for the larger bodied occupants one finds these days) and perhaps some careful work to introduce more luggage space, would not be possible without impacting too much on the price.

I agree, except that the trads have already been widened enough as they are. Put in a modern turbo engine with a water-cooled intercooler and we would see improved torque, power and fuel efficiency.
Harald


Harald
+4 4-seater 2008 Squadron Blue

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
Offline
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748
Likes: 158
The body on the Plus 4 and the Roadster could be widened in the cockpit without widening the car: wider cockpit, narrower mudguards.


Peter

[Linked Image]
Page 5 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5