|
10 members (Graham, G4FUJ, cerealsurfer, DCH, High Hamster, Montegue, JamesS, MartO, Joske Vermeule, TeddyAds, sewin),
303
guests, and
64
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums39
Topics49,860
Posts837,522
Members9,596
| |
Most Online1,063 Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,433 Likes: 66
Talk Morgan Expert
|
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,433 Likes: 66 |
You keep on mentioning this elctric Morgan that nearly hit you on the Thrill Phill if it had a stonking V8 in it you would have heard it before seeing it.A V8 can be a safety issue simples.
Em
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,257 Likes: 317
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
|
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,257 Likes: 317 |
 Are you sure you're not one of those hairy-arsed Hell's Angels who ride around on Harleys with open pipes? "Loud bikes save lives" and all that?
Tim H. 1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,433 Likes: 66
Talk Morgan Expert
|
Talk Morgan Expert
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,433 Likes: 66 |
Tim that sounds good to me lets have some t shirts printed (Loud pipes saves lives)just for the record i dont own a Harley but might have a hairy arse.
Em
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748 Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748 Likes: 158 |
So to clarify: - Morgan must build traditional cars with a dated suspension design on a dated chassic design covered in a dated bodyshape - Morgan must use state of the art engines  Morgan's (all of them including the Aeros) hark back to a byegone era - they don't chase low CO2 emissions, comfort or outright power/performance bragging rights. The people who can afford to go out and buy an Aero 8 are not going to not buy it because it costs an extra 1000eur per year in road-tax. You can't tax the rich away from buying expensive/powerful cars. My point really is not contrary to the Aero 8. If you can afford it good for you, and good for Morgan. I think that my main concern is that the trad, other than forced engine changes etc, is locked in development phase that was even outdated in the 50s. It has its charms and we love our Plus 4 but, as they say, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing and I, and I believe many others, would like something a little more updated under that classic skin. Morgan has a real hole in their product range between the 150 hp of the Plus 4 and the 280 hp of the Roadster. The trouble is that it is not easy to find a naturally aspirated engine of around 210 hp that meets homologation requirements. I actually came to Malvern with the intention of ordering a Roadster but it was a moment at which the 3 litre engines were finished and the 3.7 litre was not yet available. In any case I considered 280 hp a bit much for the trad chassis (just my thinking but I still feel that way). I tried very hard to get Morgan to fit the SS Mazda engine in a bespoke car for me but they would not consider it. In any case, as I have said many times before, I see no reason why the trad could not have a redesigned chassis and suspension and still use the existing body. The SP1 has partially proved this is possible, it could have gone much further. To get back to the Aero I remain convinced that an Aero, and for that matter the new Plus 8 would sell very well with an engine of about 250hp. BMW or Ford really doesn't matter much, and given that the Roadster doesn't have airbags perhaps even that complication can be left out. If I am correct in my thinking the final version of the Rover engined Plus 8 had about 220 hp. Here is one example of an engine that would be good and has a lovely wide peak torque range 2.0L I-4 ECOBOOST ENGINE I can't help feeling that this is a lost cause however and that Morgan fully intends to leave the trad development where it is and for the Aero range, when they have used up the contracted V8s they will switch to a powerful turbo charged 6.
Peter
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 107
L - Learner Plates On
|
L - Learner Plates On
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 107 |
Tim that sounds good to me lets have some t shirts printed (Loud pipes saves lives)just for the record i dont own a Harley but might have a hairy arse. And face
Em
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 861
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 861 |
You'll be suggesting that Morgan's future is a single "Aero" chassis - with 4 engines, 2 body types and 2 setups.
Pick one from each: 130/180/260/370 PS engine Classic/Art-Deco Touring/Sport
Imagine how much easier that would be for Morgan to produce?
2010 Aero Supersport | 2017 VW Multivan | 1996 BMW M3 Evo
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,896
Drive on the Wild Side Part of the Furniture
|
Drive on the Wild Side Part of the Furniture
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 4,896 |
A few years since we've been so maybe people just got richer and thought who cares I can afford it.
Adrian
Buggered Off, to a modern none leaky car, heart's still ticking
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,363
Talk Morgan Guru
|
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,363 |
Yes, I thought was a rather barbed comment Brian. Whilst you can't appeal to everyone's tastes with car design, the general consensus about the SP1 was that it was stunning and a very brave move by Morgan (and you!) to give the guys there something to stretch their talents. Like all cars, SP1 won't really show its true self until it is out on the road! After the launch at Salon Prive, SP1 went viral and brought Morgan the most publicity they had ever had for a model, their words not mine. Despite some aspects of the design being somewhat Marmite, overall the response was very positive and even Top Gear was impressed and the article in the current edition also highlights the skill of some of the craftsmen involved in the factory. So a guy on a DG that I do not know does not like SP1 and keeps making barbed comments about it, probably thinking it will provoke an argument, his problem not mine as life's too short! Getting back to engines, I believe that whilst legislation allows it, there should be a large capacity V8 in the model range, it's part of Morgan's heritage. The market out there for a V8 powered Aero, for example as you say, Germany, is sufficient to absorb the proposed build numbers. At some stage Morgan will need to develop the cars to accept engines to meet future legislation but diesels an absolute no no. They are going up a blind alley now after years of being pushed as the solution to reducing car emmisions. I couldn't agree more, luckily Morgan have access to the BMW V8 for now though if you remember the Eva was supposed to have the 3-litre twin turbo straight six! I realise that that model became still-born, but it just shows that MMC are open to alternatives and who know even a hybrid, at some time in the future. As you know from your closeness to the factory, the Development Department is currently very busy and whilst the Aero 8 is the culmination of a lot of work, there are other projects being developed and we look forward to seeing these launched in due course. I'm sure that the next development is a Trad, so that should keep the majority on TM happy.
Brian
1970 Morgan Plus 8 - Moss Box (Indigo Blue) 2014 Morgan SP1 (Rocket Red) 2015 Morgan Plus 8 (Rocket Blue)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,363
Talk Morgan Guru
|
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,363 |
You'll be suggesting that Morgan's future is a single "Aero" chassis - with 4 engines, 2 body types and 2 setups.
Pick one from each: 130/180/260/370 PS engine Classic/Art-Deco Touring/Sport
Imagine how much easier that would be for Morgan to produce? Interesting, though maybe based on two Aero platforms, a development of the current one for the bigger engined performance Touring/Sport model. Then a cut down Aero chassis or a shared platform with another manufacturer for the Classic/Art-Deco model. This is not based on any great insight, but just a stab in the dark...
Brian
1970 Morgan Plus 8 - Moss Box (Indigo Blue) 2014 Morgan SP1 (Rocket Red) 2015 Morgan Plus 8 (Rocket Blue)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748 Likes: 158
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 14,748 Likes: 158 |
I don't know that you would need two tubs. As we have explored before the width of the Plus 8 would seem to be mainly in the width of the mudguards to cover the wider wheels. Though it would seem that with narrow wheels the "running board" would become quite vestigial if the current tub was used. A bit like motorcycles they all have to be tailored to fit the human body so some dimensions must remain the same. In terms of engine bay length there may be some scope to reduce it for a 4 but a 6 probably needs just as much space as a V8 and then you would also need space for the intercooler.
Peter
|
|
|
|
|