Okay, I'm confused, most of you already know that about me...

If the fuel pump has a float sender built into it, why use the VDO auxiliary gauge sender?
Or am I missing something?
Also considered this. My thoughts were that the damping offered by the tube enclosed VDO sender better suited a car designed to be enthusiastically driven and with balanced twin tanks - but then they added the crazy display
A float type sender has been used for all the years I can remember on US made cars, not sure about British/European cars.
For the most part while driving down the road cruising, they do very well to give an accurate reading. When going round hard corners or start/stopping, the gas gauge is the last thing you're going to be looking at.
I agree that the somewhat shrouded VDO sender would "slow" down the response of the fuel sloshing around in the tank, but when you really need to see the fuel gauge, I feel the swinging float would be just as accurate. Also the swinging float with the fuel pump is designed to match the length of the fuel pump, assuming the fuel pump scavenging is located at the bottom of the tank.
Is there enough room inside the tank based on the fuel pump location to try and use the swinging float sender? Is the impedance the same as the VDO sender?