|
3 members (DJC, TBM, sewin),
153
guests, and
45
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tow bar
by G Walker - 24/08/26 06:52 PM
|
|
|
Forums39
Topics49,838
Posts837,294
Members9,596
| |
Most Online1,063
Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009 |
I got the impression that the lack of suitable tyres knocked the narrow body Plus4 on the head. Sadly.
Jays
Former Morgan owner. Gone but hopefully not forgotten!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,256 Likes: 317
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
|
|
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,256 Likes: 317 |
I got the impression that the lack of suitable tyres knocked the narrow body Plus4 on the head. Sadly. I'm surprised that the tyres fitted to the 4/4 are ok for the 110bhp of the Sigma engine but not adequate for the 143bhp of the Gdi? Doesn't seem like that much of a difference to me?
Tim H.
1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,550 Likes: 5
Talk Morgan Addict
|
|
Talk Morgan Addict
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,550 Likes: 5 |
The plus 4 would be heavier, its the number before the letter, it's not to do with power.
Mark - No Longer driving Archie the Old English Sheep Mog........... 2010 Roadster 3.0 V6 (S3) 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,256 Likes: 317
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
|
|
Scruffy Oik Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,256 Likes: 317 |
The plus 4 would be heavier, its the number before the letter, it's not to do with power. Yes, 795kg v 927kg is a more significant difference, but neither are exactly lardy, the early MX5s were 970 Kg - although admittedly they had 5.5" rims. Avon CR's are apparently made in 175x15 which will fit 5" rims, and I'm surprised they aren't up to a 930kg/140bhp car. But if MMC can only get hold of 185 tyres, or the 175s are only available in soft compound, I can see why they won't fit them to 5" rims.
Tim H.
1986 4/4 VVTi Sport, 2002 LR Defender, 2022 Mini Cooper SE
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,550 Likes: 5
Talk Morgan Addict
|
|
Talk Morgan Addict
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,550 Likes: 5 |
Probably more to do with advice from lawyers!
Mark - No Longer driving Archie the Old English Sheep Mog........... 2010 Roadster 3.0 V6 (S3)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,356 Likes: 353
Roadster Guru Member of the Inner Circle
|
|
Roadster Guru Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 22,356 Likes: 353 |
175/70HR15s should be up to the job though and probably more choice.
DaveW
'05 Red Roadster S1
'16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,118
Has a lot to Say!
|
|
Has a lot to Say!
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,118 |
The CRZ's are expensive and at the moment there are some good deals on these but at 10000 miles it is too early for me at the moment!
RogT Old Git Racer ex 4/4 sand 2013
+4 GDI Royal Ivory 2015
Ford Fiesta ST2
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,945 Likes: 28
Charter Member
|
|
Charter Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,945 Likes: 28 |
The plus 4 would be heavier, its the number before the letter, it's not to do with power. Yes, 795kg v 927kg is a more significant difference, but neither are exactly lardy, the early MX5s were 970 Kg - although admittedly they had 5.5" rims. Not quite sure I am understanding you here. Are you saying that this large weight difference is down to the engine change from 4/4 to plus 4?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,435 Likes: 122
Talk Morgan Guru
|
|
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,435 Likes: 122 |
The plus 4 would be heavier, its the number before the letter, it's not to do with power. Yes, 795kg v 927kg is a more significant difference, but neither are exactly lardy, the early MX5s were 970 Kg - although admittedly they had 5.5" rims. Not quite sure I am understanding you here. Are you saying that this large weight difference is down to the engine change from 4/4 to plus 4? This weight numbers considering the Plus4 NB seem to be more in the 3.0 Roadster territory. Are the number of the MMC announcement really correct? TBH the same issue happens with any other brand with the exception that the basic weights should be right. But if you order extras with a BMW or similar brand they never show you the exact add on of weight online if you e.g. order a sun roof or leather seats etc. Anyway the Plus4 NB should be a nice choice but I'm personally more than happy with my 4/4 due to the advantage of the even better balanced car. Just to swap for a sports manifold makes her significantly sufficient. But on the other hand, the difference of 132 Kg between a Sigma 1.6 and a 2.0 engine seems to be ridiculously much too high. ...Or MMC has changed other items also to reach the claimed amount of weight regarding the P4 NB....Or the condition of measuring has changed (e.g. dry curb weight vs. two passengers on board and a half filled petrol tank or whatsever).
'14 4/4 graphite grey
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,437 Likes: 131
Black Rat Charter Member
|
|
Black Rat Charter Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 5,437 Likes: 131 |
To answer the original question, us NB + 4 owners love them so much we arn't selling 
Keith
2013 narrow bodied + 4 Ruby.
|
|
|
|
|
