Click here to return to the home page.
Morgan 3 Wheeler
Who's Online Now
6 members (Mog on Island, TBM, RichardV6, bmgermany, Rex_tulips, mph), 369 guests, and 39 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
+8Rich 65
Adam12 62
John V6 59
Newest Members
Chris Ontario, NickMog, YellowM, Dufty, Anted4
9,215 Registered Users
Newest Topics
New
by Rex_tulips - 30/07/25 07:59 PM
For saleWood rim moto-lita
by hugo - 30/07/25 04:28 PM
For Sale 2015 M3W - £23,000
by MOG42 - 29/07/25 06:28 PM
AC Cobra Rep. Vs Plus 8
by Richardllll - 29/07/25 04:40 PM
Me Again
by Whizjet - 29/07/25 03:13 PM
Tyre dates on Yokohama tyres
by SteveMerch - 29/07/25 12:39 PM
Aero 8 Maintenance
by mph - 29/07/25 09:24 AM
Latest Photos
Moto-lita for sale
Moto-lita for sale
by hugo, July 30
2015 M3W for sale
2015 M3W for sale
by MOG42, July 29
Motorworld München
Motorworld München
by Oskar, July 20
visit to Classic Remise Düsseldorf
my book
my book
by Oskar, July 20
Forum Statistics
Forums34
Topics48,365
Posts813,346
Members9,215
Most Online1,046
Aug 24th, 2023
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,562
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Offline
Talk Morgan Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,562
crikey , apart from the dyno tune , that sounds like the Morgan stage 2 kit which is about £1000 cheaper or was when I bought it about 2 years ago. (Before VAT)
Anyone got any evidence this is not the case ?

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 21
B
New to Talk Morgan
OP Offline
New to Talk Morgan
B
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 21
See below quote from a previous thread:


Originally Posted By Osama
I just received a reply from the factory through my dealer about stage 2, and stage 3 performance upgrades.

Stage 2:
stage 1 + Cam's, Throttle body, Ecu. Adds +30 hp more. £2500

Stage 3:
Stage2 + CNC over ported heads , Cam's, Throttle body, Rockers, Ecu. +50 hp. £9,795.


Beware all these HP figures.

Morgan (apparently) don't have a dyno. They failed to answer any of my questions along these lines....I think, like the originally quoted 115hp....which then shrank to 82 hp (?), numbers are being chucked about willy nilly.

The only numbers I have are from my Stage three dyno chart from Krazy Horse which shows only a small gain over Morgan's (so called) official 3 Wheeler figure. I wonder if Morgan's number was even
accurate at 82hp.

The actual (untuned) Mog output may be as much as 40 hp LESS than the original test cars gave..OR were claimed to give. Why was this? To protect the drive train? To protect the driver? To protect the engine? Was the original engine set-up half baked? Or was it a way of value adding ...ie detune and then sell performance kits? I have no idea.

It's a Mog sized mystery.


Last edited by bencmaster; 03/04/17 06:52 AM.
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,213
H
HJP Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
H
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,213
The original brochure quoted an estimated 115bhp and an estimated 0-60 time of 4.5 seconds . It also states "a weight of less than 500kg " ....

My standard 2012 car was tested on the KrazyHorse dyno , I passed the printout on to Tim W when I sold it but I seem to remember the horsepower being just below 80 . So your car tested on the same dyno is showing a very worthwhile improvement !


Hugh
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 402
Likes: 3
T
Learner Plates Off!
Offline
Learner Plates Off!
T
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 402
Likes: 3
Interesting topic. I am going to fit the G56 pipes very shortly. The car is going to KH for service on Friday, it would be interesting to have dynamometer readout If the pipes are fitted by then.

For info this is the printout that Hugh had of his car.



Tim

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,075
D
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
D
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,075
Originally Posted By bencmaster
Although the whole business of what the kit would deliver seemed a little vague, I was assured I'd notice the difference. There was a dyno print out that seemed to suggest that either the increase in HP was small, or Morgan themselves had been deluded about the actual power of their product. Well, we'd see:



Bencmaster, congrats on your new upgrade.

I'm glad you're seeing some seat of the pants improvement.

As far as what the true improvement is, I find it very sad that KH didn't do a baseline pull on your M3W prior to the work they did. How else can the quantify you're getting what you paid for.

Any tuner I'm familiar with will do at least one or two baseline pulls and then after the upgrades do all their "tuning" pulls until they have the AFR, torque and HP all figured out. Your AFR is just a straight line, so it's hard to say what changed from your over lean original MAP versus their after MAP.

Either way though, you're happy with the outcome and that's what it's all about.

But it would have nice to see what a stock M3W puts out.


Dan
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,213
H
HJP Offline
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
H
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,213
Thanks for posting that Tim 72.93 is a bit lower than I had thought I remembered , it'll be very interesting to see what difference the G56 exhausts make , hope you get them fitted before the service .

Dan the print out that Tim posted is of a stock 2013 car .

Hugh


Hugh
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 21
B
New to Talk Morgan
OP Offline
New to Talk Morgan
B
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 21
I do agree about the baseline dyno test. As for AFRs, its not actually a straight line on my Mog tune, I certainly don't use straight line when setting up on aircraft, but then nor do they vary massively either.

I think, there is very roughly a 8-10 hp hike (say 10%) since the Stage three, but it may be less. This is based on what the dyno chart says and what they say a standard Mog kicks out. Seat of the pants estimate suggest broadly same.

Quantified against the cost, it might be well well worth it if you do a lot of two up / A road travel, assuming no problems manifest themselves with the upgrade..


Ben

Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 433
Learner Plates Off!
Offline
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 433
Remember that there is a generally 10% to 20% difference between rear wheel HP and crank HP. And it's also very dependent on the dyno, the weather, etc. So 85 RWHP could easily be ~110 crank HP. You really should not compare across dyno results as there are too many variables.

I'm also surprised they didn't do a before/after run on the same dyno under the same conditions, as that's really the only way to see a relative change.

Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 902
Talk Morgan Regular
Offline
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 902
After speaking to Stuart at Kh.
Horsepower figures are subjective at best, depending on how they are calculated.
It also depends on where they are calculated from.

Some dealers take their readings from the crank, some take them from the rear wheel.
Some dealers quote maximum figures.

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,075
D
Has a lot to Say!
Offline
Has a lot to Say!
D
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,075
Originally Posted By HJP
Thanks for posting that Tim 72.93 is a bit lower than I had thought I remembered , it'll be very interesting to see what difference the G56 exhausts make , hope you get them fitted before the service .

Dan the print out that Tim posted is of a stock 2013 car .

Hugh


My bad... frown


Dan
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  TalkMorgan 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5