|
7 members (MATTMOG, +8Rich, Sir Percival, TalkMorgan, TBM, Ian Wegg, Mark+4),
238
guests, and
86
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Wales
by Joske Vermeule, September 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums39
Topics49,867
Posts837,624
Members9,596
| |
Most Online1,063 Jun 14th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,683 Likes: 413
Needs to Get Out More!
|
OP
Needs to Get Out More!
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,683 Likes: 413 |
Unable to see them on my car during factory tour yesterday as wings already fitted, and didn't have opportunity to look closer. Just googled for images and found this  which is what I would expect assuming it takes the brake caliper force from a pivoting mount to the chassis. I also found this though  which to my mind is just an extra stay from the top of the upright, although I would grudgingly admit it would help supporting same under heavy braking. Which is closest to that which MMC currently fit when included in build spec?
Richard
2018 Roadster 3.7 1966 Land Rover S2a 88 2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 1945 Guzzi Airone
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,682 Likes: 493
Just barreling along Needs to Get Out More!
|
Just barreling along Needs to Get Out More!
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 8,682 Likes: 493 |
Identical to the Mulberry ones
Jon M
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 14,009 |
If they fit them at customer request, the latter which is a stainless tube. I have to say....and I know I’ll get shot down here....that unless you are a hard braker, they are not really necessary. Which is why the factory don’t fit them as standard.
Jays Former Morgan owner. Gone but hopefully not forgotten!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 970 Likes: 1
Talk Morgan Regular
|
Talk Morgan Regular
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 970 Likes: 1 |
They are fitted to mine ( mulberry ) To be honest I can't tell any difference 
Magwa 1950 Allis Chalmers B tractor 2000 Porsche boxster 2014 Skoda yeti 4x4 elegans
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,553 Likes: 88
Talk Morgan Guru
|
Talk Morgan Guru
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 7,553 Likes: 88 |
Is there any concern that potentially they load a part of the chassis, that is not specially strengthened!?
Bud 4/4 "Stanley"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,017 Likes: 3
Charter Member
|
Charter Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,017 Likes: 3 |
They are fitted to mine ( mulberry ) To be honest I can't tell any difference +1
Hannes once: Green M3W; 2013 now: Red 4/4 Sport; 2011 and some practical cars for use in real life
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,683 Likes: 413
Needs to Get Out More!
|
OP
Needs to Get Out More!
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,683 Likes: 413 |
Thanks for replies. I'm a great believer in having braking and acceleration forces transmitted to chassis rather than suspension although I accept the front suspension on the classic Morgans is a special case. It seems the optional MMC ones do not achieve that directly. As to whether they are needed or not I can only draw on my greater experience with motorcycle engineering. For very many years Moto Guzzi and BMW produced shaft drive bikes with the bevel box directly coupled to the suspension swinging arm. Torque reaction from this caused the rear suspension to unload so the seat rose under hard acceleration. As this didn't make the bike dangerous under general road conditions it could be argued that a solution was not needed. Interesting though that both companies have developed fully floating shaft transmissions. Here is an early example of a bike I built up with a custom Tony Foale frame back in the early 80's.  All three brake calipers are attached to mounting brackets pivoting concentric with wheel spindles. Each of these is anchored by a rose jointed reaction arm in tension, direct to frame or forks. Similarly the bevel box is free to float about the rear wheel axis with drive through a propshaft jointed at each end, with a reaction arm also in tension from bevel box to frame, just seen behind wheel. The handling was like no other shaft drive bike at the time feeling rock solid in corners when under power or braking. Interesting that Moto Guzzi introduced a similar drive system some years later 
Richard
2018 Roadster 3.7 1966 Land Rover S2a 88 2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 1945 Guzzi Airone
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 27,816 Likes: 749
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 27,816 Likes: 749 |
That is a lovely Guzzi. Is it a Le Man Mk1 engine? I had a MKIII Le Mans for 8 years and loved it.
JohnV6 2022 CX Plus Four 2025 Renault Scenic Alpine etech "Yvette"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,683 Likes: 413
Needs to Get Out More!
|
OP
Needs to Get Out More!
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 8,683 Likes: 413 |
Thanks John. The engine was not based on any particular model being a big V twin crankcase bored out to 95mm (from memory) to give 1105cc. Very many other mods including slipper pistons, flywheel/clutch one third normal weight, bored out (41mm) Dellorto pumper carbs and all internals balanced and polished.
Richard
2018 Roadster 3.7 1966 Land Rover S2a 88 2024 Royal Enfield Guerrilla 450 1945 Guzzi Airone
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 30
Just Getting Started
|
Just Getting Started
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 30 |
I had the Mulberry parts installed for a while in my 4/4 Sport ... I could not tell any difference.
What annoyed me was the fact that there is not enough clearence and the (stock) tires rub on the stay on full lock -> removed.
Wolfgang
2009 4/4 Sport 1932 Three Wheeler SS other stuff.....
|
|
|
|
|