Forums34
Topics48,379
Posts813,559
Members9,215
|
Most Online1,046 Aug 24th, 2023
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 17
New to Talk Morgan
|
OP
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 17 |
Can anyone give an explanation for the unused drillings in the offside chassis rail? There are 2 about 300mm behind the cross brace under the gearbox that penetrate through into the drivers footwell. The only closure here is the backing to the interior trim that is glued to the inside of the body panel. Having removed the carpet to inspect the floor panel, it was evident that at some time in the past water had soaked into the wood. As I've only owned the car from April this year and not had it out in the wet, it is clear that this happened some time back in cars history.
There are another pair of drillings in the chassis rail further back which penetrate the area under/behind the drivers seat. Again, you can actually put a screw driver in and push against the backface of the interior trim.
Other than to let water into the car interior I can't think of any purpuse for these drillings. Any reason not to plug and seal with grommets?
Jon
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,871 Likes: 168
Roadster Guru Member of the Inner Circle
|
Roadster Guru Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 21,871 Likes: 168 |
What's it like on the other side Jon? No holes? I have some holes drilled in the wrong place in the floorboards which I've filled. Use a bit of wood filler in the wood if you can get at it, and grommets will be OK in the metal.
DaveW '05 Red Roadster S1 '16 Yellow (Not the only) Narrow AR GDI Plus 4
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 17
New to Talk Morgan
|
OP
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 17 |
Dave, These are in the chassis rail, not the floorboards. The exhaust system is mounted on the nearside. Can't see unused holes at the front although I can see one at the rear. Again adjacent to underside/rear of seat. As on the offside, I can see the back of the interior trim. Makes no sense to me. Just inviting water into the car interior. I think these are factory drillings not someone getting something wrong later. Car has only done 8000 miles with 2 non DIY owners.
Jon
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 462
Learner Plates Off!
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 462 |
I am not familiar with such newfangled things like cars from 1996 but could it be that the same chassis was used for 4/4's or +8's with the exhaust mountings in other locations? Not closing the surplus holes would be standard Morgan practice (with the intention to give the owner the satisfaction of having done something himself).
Frank, in a sarcastic mood
1967 4/4 1500 Comp. 1935 Super Sports Barrelback
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 17
New to Talk Morgan
|
OP
New to Talk Morgan
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 17 |
I think you are right in saying that they are possibly exhaust bracket mounting points. Not sure what other models use the same chassis as a +4. I've put in rubber grommets and oversprayed with underseal. I'm planning on laying the car up shortly and will spend the winter months repainting and resealing the underbody.
Jon
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,434 Likes: 183
Salty Sea Dog Member of the Inner Circle
|
Salty Sea Dog Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,434 Likes: 183 |
I think you have the same chassis as a +8, which with two exhaust pipes might explain some of the extra holes...
Cheers,
Graham (G4FUJ)
Sold L44FOR 4/4 Giallo Fly '09 Gen2 MINI Cooper ragtop '90 LR 90 SW
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 478
Learner Plates Off!
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 478 |
I'm pretty sure that in '96 a +4 would have had a +4 chassis. The MMC only standardised chassis (On the heavier +8 Chassis) in 2004(?)
Brian
Last edited by Brian V; 12/11/10 08:50 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,770 Likes: 429
Member of the Inner Circle
|
Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 26,770 Likes: 429 |
My 97 +4 has I think a +8 chassis with two exhaust holes etc
JohnV6 2022 CX Plus Four 2025 MG ZS EV aka Trigger
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,434 Likes: 183
Salty Sea Dog Member of the Inner Circle
|
Salty Sea Dog Member of the Inner Circle
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 28,434 Likes: 183 |
Possible Brian, but the +4 became the same width as the +8 around '92 / '93. I'd guess that was when commonality of chassis occurred - certainly the M16 and later T16 +4s used the same gearbox as the +8s of the period.
Cheers,
Graham (G4FUJ)
Sold L44FOR 4/4 Giallo Fly '09 Gen2 MINI Cooper ragtop '90 LR 90 SW
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 478
Learner Plates Off!
|
Learner Plates Off!
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 478 |
Hi Graham, Yep. My Bad,. The mid 90's spec for +8 and +4 have the same gearbox and same width. So it would seem unlikely that they had different chassis.
Brian
|
|
|
|
|