A suspension design from the turn of last century, a chassis design from the thirties.........
Who would really expect this combination to feel like a modern car?
Who, with any sense would chose a Morgan to take his wife/partner away for the weekend without some serious research?
Especially about boot space........
Who would get into a convertible car with a low, almost vertical windscreen and then complain about the buffeting at speed......
Well, it appears the the Telegraph Motoring Journalist does just this.
Dangerous at speed? Only if the driver is inexperienced.....
Then we get the smug 911 Carrera4 contributor. We are "Hairy Arsed" then? Well, those who chose to be dynamically controlled by computers and cosseted in a tin box must belong to the well manicured and soft handed brigade. Nothing wrong with being well manicured, but it's not real driving is it. HaHa.
But a less relevant comparison would be hard to find. Let's make a real comparison with what Porsche were knocking out in the 30's. Oh just a minute, we'll have to make do with a Peopleswagon. But to make it fair lets use a convertible. So - a 1930's Beetle cabriolet with a galvanised floor and superform wings. Keep the torsion bars and trailing arms but add a modern engine. Now that's a better comparison....... Actually it would probably be good fun to drive.
Then there was the "Try an XK150" quip. Too late mate. The correct Jag would be the prewar SS. And hey presto, a nice Kit Car version is available with a modern engine.
But I'll stick with my Trad Morgan, and I'm happy to let the tin box brigade feel smug in their boxes. I mean, even I have to 'tin box it' sometimes........
At this point I'll step down from the soapbox.